What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Nov. 20 2009 - 9:17 am | 8 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

First fewer mammograms, now fewer Paps

Pap test, Papanicolau stain, 400x. Atrophic sq...

Image via Wikipedia

Not to be outdone by the United States Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology has announced that they are recommending less cancer screening, as well.

New guidelines for cervical cancer screening say women should delay their first Pap test until age 21, and be screened less often than recommended in the past.

via Guidelines Push Back Age for Cervical Cancer Tests – NYTimes.com.

Although their science is sound, their timing is unfortunate.  Piggybacked on the controversial recommendations of the USPSTF for less breast cancer screening earlier this week, these recommendations may stoke the fears of many regarding rationing of services as part of health care reform.  Not only that, but given that both sets of recommendations apply only to women, I wouldn’t be surprised if some started to worry about gender bias in health care.

However, both sets of recommendations have been a long time in the making, despite the apparent abruptness in these announcements.  There have been numerous studies over the past several years looking at the efficacy of screening tests when applied to large populations.  Medical practice is about as agile as the Titanic, changing course only when there’s an iceberg of evidence confronting it, and even then usually a little later than it should have.  Apparently the USPSTF and ACOG encountered their icebergs at the same time.

As to gender bias, I say coincidence.  Women anatomically have more things to screen, so it stands to reason that their screening protocols would be reviewed, and potentially changed, more often.

Unfortunately, I suspect the double-whammy of less screening for women via mammograms and pap smears is going to poison the waters of the health care reform debate and lead to decisions based more on emotion and less on scientific evidence.  If we want reasonable health care, we need to be making reasonable and evidence-based decisions.


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    It is important to point out that whereas the recommendation on mammograms came from a government task force, the pap smear recommendation came from a private group of obstetricians. If this distinction is lost is will be a very big problem, so it is important to hammer this fact home.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I grew up on a farm and worked my way through college slinging pizzas, walking dogs, and assisting with autopsies. I received my M.D. from the University of Chicago-Pritzker School of Medicine and completed my residency in internal medicine at Boston's Beth Israel Hospital. I then took a faculty position at the newly-merged Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, but after two and a half years of commuting in Big Dig traffic with a screaming toddler in tow, I thought I'd try moving back to my home state of South Dakota. I am currently Associate Professor of Internal Medicine and Program Director of the Internal Medicine Residency Program at the Sanford School of Medicine of the University of South Dakota.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 57
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:South Dakota

    What I'm Up To

    Check out my stuff on change.org.