What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Nov. 16 2009 - 5:52 pm | 937 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

Fewer mammograms for middle-aged women

The arrow on this mammogram points to a small ...

Image via Wikipedia

In a decision that’s bound to raise eyebrows, especially on the heels of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is recommending less screening for breast cancer.

Most women should start regular breast cancer screening at age 50, not 40, according to new guidelines released Monday by an influential group that provides guidance to doctors, insurance companies and policy makers.  The new recommendations reverse longstanding guidelines and are aimed at reducing harm from overtreatment, the group says. It also says women age 50 to 74 should have mammograms less frequently — every two years, rather than every year. And it said doctors should stop teaching women to examine their breasts on a regular basis.

via In Reversal, U.S. Guidelines Urge Mammograms at 50, Not 40 – NYTimes.com.

At issue is the question of excess irradiation and high frequency of false positive mammograms in the 40-50 year old age group, which in turn leads to a great deal of testing and anxiety.  The two groups with arguably the greatest financial interest in the status quo, the American Cancer Society and the American College of Radiology, are predictably upset at the announcement.

But the new report conflicts with advice from groups like the American Cancer Society and the American College of Radiology. They are staying with their guidelines advising annual mammograms starting at age 40.

The cancer society, in a statement by Dr. Otis W. Brawley, its chief medical officer, agreed that mammography had risks as well as benefits but, he said, the society’s experts had looked at “virtually all” the task force and additional data and concluded that the benefits of annual mammograms starting at age 40 outweighed the risks.

via In Reversal, U.S. Guidelines Urge Mammograms at 50, Not 40 – NYTimes.com.

Personally, however, I agree with the new USPSTF recommendations.  The excess radiation is not inconsequential, and the rate of false-positive mammograms approaches 8% in the younger women, according to this article from the New England Journal of Medicine.  I’ll be curious to see the reaction of others in the medical community.


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Turi – I’m sure the mammogram recommendations will be hotly disputed, but how do you feel about the breast self-exams? Can I stop feeling guilty about not doing them?

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I grew up on a farm and worked my way through college slinging pizzas, walking dogs, and assisting with autopsies. I received my M.D. from the University of Chicago-Pritzker School of Medicine and completed my residency in internal medicine at Boston's Beth Israel Hospital. I then took a faculty position at the newly-merged Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, but after two and a half years of commuting in Big Dig traffic with a screaming toddler in tow, I thought I'd try moving back to my home state of South Dakota. I am currently Associate Professor of Internal Medicine and Program Director of the Internal Medicine Residency Program at the Sanford School of Medicine of the University of South Dakota.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 57
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:South Dakota

    What I'm Up To

    Check out my stuff on change.org.