What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Mar. 11 2010 - 9:09 pm | 994 views | 1 recommendation | 15 comments

Please, Hollywood, don’t remake The Wizard of Oz!

Cropped screenshot of Judy Garland from the tr...

I hadn’t even pulled off my 3-D glasses after watching Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland when I worried that, oh no, now they will think they can remake The Wizard of Oz. They, of course, being Hollywood decision-makers. And now it comes to pass:

With the 3-D film Alice in Wonderland booming at the box office, Hollywood apparently thinks the time is right for remakes of the 1939 classic The Wizard of Oz, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Tuesday, the Times reported on Warner Bros. plans, which include one project that “skews a little darker” and focuses on a granddaughter of Dorothy who returns to Oz to fight evil.

Hollywood weighs at least four ‘Wizard of Oz’ remakes. Oh My!

Look–I love Burton’s Wonderland ( or Underland, as Johnny Depp’s Mad Hatter would correct). Once you get past the tedious above-ground set-up, it’s a magical, multi-colored, extraordinary visual journey. Not only that, but it has the dialogue snap of Mary Martin’s 1950s televised Peter Pan and the eerie, ominous landscape of Peter Jackson’s 2001 Lord of the Rings.

I cannot, however, imagine remaking The Wizard of Oz, a movie so far ahead of its time, it could not be enhanced by 3-D.  And then there’s that unforgettable score–including  Judy Garland’s classic  “Over the Rainbow” rendition.

If studios want to move forward with the story–okay, try it. I’m willing to give any interpretation  a look. I enjoyed The Wiz and loved Wicked. But don’t use Alice as a bone-headed reason to remake the original Oz. The only worthy precursor to Burton’s Alice is Disney’s animated film. (Painting the roses red! Who could ever replicate that scene?)

Here’s an idea–if you have to remake The Wizard of Oz, if you really insist, please recruit Tim Burton for the job. I would definitely follow his Yellow Brick Road–even if the destination is disastrous.


Comments

Active Conversation
3 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 15 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    There is no resisting it… hollywood is so stale all they have left is the re-making of what was good way back when.

    I can’t wait for the remake of it’s a wonderful life in 3-d with Ben Stiller as the lead… /sarcasmoff

  2. collapse expand

    Yep. It sucks. And what’s worse is, you should get ready for them to remake everything. That’s their new business model. Absolutely everything. From classics to the Korean hit of last year, to alternate takes of popular movies from recent memory (Spiderman, Terminator, Superman, etc.). It sucks. And what makes it suck worse than normal everyday sucking is how unabashed they are about this being the new paradigm. I’m going to Hollywood with a baseball bat. Wanna come!?

  3. collapse expand

    It’s funny, but my wife and I had the same experience as you did after watching TB’s Alice in Wonderland.

    We both were concerned that they would soon make an Oz remake considering how stale Hollowwood (not a typo!)has become. Its not that there hasn’t been a couple of gems in the past couple of years, but nothing like 1939.

    So King Kong, Alice In Wonderland, soon Wizard of OZ…it just seems so likely. I have one advice to offer: With all the books in the OZ series, why doesn’t Hollowwood just pick one of them and make that from scratch?

    Just leave this perfect work of film art alone. How can you remake perfection? WHO can replace Judy Garland? Lady GAGA? I don’t think so.

    I don’t know, maybe I’m an OZ snob, but picking that film for a remake is like slapping monkey dung on a canvas and trying to pass it as the new Mona Lisa. It just doesn’t work.

  4. collapse expand

    Hello again Susan. Here is an Oz movies catalog showing every film made on the subject:

    http://www.halcyon.com/piglet/movies.htm

    Maybe a little hunting and viewing these films might better explain what it is about the MGM’s 1939 masterpiece that truly cements it as a film that is untouchable other then to restore.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Waitress money in pocket, typewriter in hand, I came to New York from Ohio to make my living as a writer. No high aspirations: English was simply the only subject I'd never failed. In a matter of weeks, I went from writing a college thesis on Clarissa Harlowe to a romantic dissection of Dean Martin's divorce. It's been a bumpy ride ever since, with long pauses at the New York Daily News (where I edited Rex Reed, Pete Hamill, Jimmy Breslin and my now-husband Lorenzo Carcaterra) and People magazine (Diana! Oscars! Sexy Men! ), and shorter stops with a select crew of bipolar employers. My most delightful three years were spent as the founding editor of a women's weekly, Quick & Simple, where I picked up such tips as: To get more juice from a lemon, nuke it for 15 to 30 seconds before squeezing. All the better for making lemonade.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 153
    Contributor Since: February 2009
    Location:New York City

    What I'm Up To

    Art Isn’t Easy

    No. 8 by Mark Rothko

    I loved both Broadway shows, Sondheim on Sondheim and Red, which spotlight two great talents, two views of the world.  You can read my thoughts here.