What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Dec. 20 2009 - 6:30 pm | 20 views | 0 recommendations | 1 comment

Real-Life CSI: The Mess in New York State

Of all the factors that cause wrongful convictions, shoddy testing in police agency crime laboratories is probably the most difficult to parse because the nature of the work is so technical. As a result, journalists, lawyers, law professors and others who should be investigating crime lab ineffectiveness and misconduct often shy away from the task. It is easy to conclude that without a PhD in chemistry and a companion degree in biology, no investigator can tell for certain what constitute acceptable protocol in crime laboratories.

As I previously discussed (in my December 5 posting), no crime lab runs nearly as well as those portrayed on the popular CBS network television dramas set in Las Vegas, Miami and New York City. The reality of actual police crime labs became news this week with the release of a book-length report by a New York State inspector general’s team.

The title: “Report of Investigation of the Trace Evidence Section of the New York State Police Forensic Investigation Center.” That title does not ascend from the vocal chords to roll off the tongue easily. The language of the report will not be easy to comprehend, especially for a generalist. But I will study the report carefully, then share the details with you so that you can avoid the task if you like.

I can share with you, thanks to news coverage in the New York Times and elsewhere, that the portrayal of the New York State Police crime lab is ugly. Probably no crime lab will ever operate without flaws. But the situation will almost certainly improve by removing crime labs from police agency jurisdiction, giving them independent status. Such a process will cost lots of money in each state, and consume years of effort.

Still, that change would alleviate subtle and not-so-subtle pressures from police detectives and prosecutors on crime lab analysts to interpret evidence so they can nail the bad guys, even when the bad guys are innocent.

If you like, continue to tune in to CBS network television programming, and cable television re-runs of the CSI dramas. But for the sorry truth about crime labs, use your time reading such documents as inspector general’s reports with titles that fail to roll off the tongue.


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Investigative reporter since 1969, starting on daily newspapers, moving to magazines, then to writing books. In 1978, I decided to reject the world of regular paychecks and freelance for newspapers and magazines while continuing to write nonfiction books. Since 1976, I have been active in an international group called Investigative Reporters and Editors (www.ire.org). From 1983-1990, I ran IRE day to day, and still help edit its magazine. Partly from passion and partly for mercenary reasons, I have been teaching students part-time at the University of Missouri Journalism School since 1978. As you would deduce from my trueslant.com blog, my research, writing and teaching have increasingly focused on exposing flaws in the criminal justice system, especially when those flaws lead to the imprisonment of innocent men and women.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 155
    Contributor Since: September 2009
    Location:Columbia, Missouri