What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Apr. 12 2010 - 4:20 pm | 82 views | 0 recommendations | 1 comment

White House nixes Hillary Clinton Supreme Court rumors

New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton laughs...

Image by AFP/Getty Images via Daylife

Though she lead many court-watchers’ short lists of prospective replacements for retiring Justice John Paul Stevens, the White House put the kibash on those rumors today. Reports the Washington Post:

“Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is not under consideration as a Supreme Court nominee, the White House said Monday. ‘The president thinks Secretary Clinton is doing an excellent job as Secretary of State and wants her to remain in that position,’ White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said.”

One of my favorite legal commentators, Slate’s Emily Bazelon, has always been a big Clinton cheerleader (though she didn’t support her presidential run, interestingly) made a great case for Clinton as an associate justice late last week:

She’s been an advocate for children and for families for as long as she’s been in public life. They are in need of as much help as they can get on the court. (Wait for this term’s ruling on whether juveniles can serve life without parole to see what I mean.) She knows how to frame ideas for a wide audience, which would help the liberal wing of the court counterbalance the genius rhetoric of Antonin Scalia.

Most in the know seem to agree that the two main contenders are Diane Wood and Elena Kegan, who were both vetted last time a vacancy came up under Obama’s then very young presidency. Whether or not you’re disappointed by Clinton being now officially out of the running, how exciting is it that general consensus (for whatever it’s worth) seems to place two women as the front-runners for another Supreme Court post. Though the nominee hasn’t been announced and we’re still a long, hard-fought confirmation battle away, dare I say we might be a little closer to real representation on the nation’s highest bench?


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Who is obama gonna to appoint? i don’t think he knows a single person who respects the laws and Constitution……

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm a Los Angeles-based writer and editor focusing on pop and politics, race and culture, and where Gen-Yers fit into it all. My writing has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the Christian Science Monitor, WashingtonPost.com, the San Francisco Chronicle and People magazine. Among other things, I'm Oregon-born, hip-hop-addicted, and weirdly optimistic that the journalism business will stay alive.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 204
    Contributor Since: September 2009
    Location:Los Angeles

    What I'm Up To

    Check Me Out

    … in Salon, where I contribute to the Broadsheet blog.

    … in Slate, where I’ve recently written an assessment piece on California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman; and ranted about why female journalists in movies are so lame.

    … or in the Christian Science Monitor, where I discussed Gen Y views on originality and plagiarism; and sized up Disney’s progress in representing race on the big screen.