What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Mar. 23 2010 - 4:36 pm | 658 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

Christiane Amanpour, Vaughn Walker, and the objectivity double-standard

Christiane Amanpour at the Vanity Fair celebra...

Image via Wikipedia

Salon’s Glenn Greenwald has done a characteristically badass job of ripping apart this insulting Tom Shales column questioning Christiane Amanpour’s fitness to become the new host of “This Week,” suggesting, unreasonably, that being accused of “liberal bias” (a charge leveled at anyone outside of Fox News) and that being of Iranian descent means she couldn’t possibly be objective.

Most journalists found the choice of Amanpour refreshing – and after initially wondering what middle-aged white man would inevitably get the gig, I was one of them. So was Adam Serwer, who expanded on Greenwald’s piece by comparing Shales’ take on Amanpour to the plight of Sonia Sotomayor:

As with Sonia Sotomayor no amount of personal excellence can calm certain kinds of skepticism, because the question really comes down to one of resources and tribalist rivalry. Amanpour would be the only woman hosting a Sunday morning show on one of the major three networks, just as Sotomayor became the first Latina on the court. Because of her gender and ethnic background, she is another challenger to a professional space traditionally reserved for white men.

Though this is spot-on, Greenwald’s post and the unfair skepticism surrounding Amanpour reminded me, actually, of a different judge who similarly doesn’t fit the default objectivity standard: Vaughn Walker.

While virtually anyone with legitimate knowledge of the legal system acknowledges that Walker is fair, the judge deciding the federal trial over the constitutionality of Prop. 8 is gay himself, and therefore, as Gawker points out, “If he rules against Prop. 8, the homophobes will have their big, nasty appeal primed and ready.”

The National Review has already taken Walker to task, ignoring the judge was appointed by a Republican, tends to lean conservative, and is roundly considered fair even by his opponents. Instead, NR writes inexplicably: “From the outset, Walker’s entire course of conduct in the anti-Prop 8 case has reflected a manifest design to turn the lawsuit into a high-profile, culture-transforming, history-making, Scopes-style show trial of Prop 8’s sponsors.”

There you have it: If you’re not, male, white and straight, you simply cannot judge things fairly. Or report on them.


2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    I’d say well done, but my viewpoint would probably be called into question.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I'm a Los Angeles-based writer and editor focusing on pop and politics, race and culture, and where Gen-Yers fit into it all. My writing has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the Christian Science Monitor, WashingtonPost.com, the San Francisco Chronicle and People magazine. Among other things, I'm Oregon-born, hip-hop-addicted, and weirdly optimistic that the journalism business will stay alive.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 204
    Contributor Since: September 2009
    Location:Los Angeles

    What I'm Up To

    Check Me Out

    … in Salon, where I contribute to the Broadsheet blog.

    … in Slate, where I’ve recently written an assessment piece on California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman; and ranted about why female journalists in movies are so lame.

    … or in the Christian Science Monitor, where I discussed Gen Y views on originality and plagiarism; and sized up Disney’s progress in representing race on the big screen.