What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Feb. 6 2010 - 1:33 pm | 141 views | 1 recommendation | 2 comments

Washington Post: Liberals Suck!

The entrance to the Washington Post on 15th st...

Image by dionhinchcliffe via Flickr

I don’t think I’ll ever get over the Washington Post piece in which Charlotte Allen suggested all women are morons, or the fact that the editors there ran it. Now, the op-ed page is telling me I’m a terrible person for a reason other than posessing two X chromosomes: because I’m liberal.

This is a problem, writes Gerard Alexander, because liberals

appear committed to the proposition that their views are correct, self-evident, and based on fact and reason, while conservative positions are not just wrong but illegitimate, ideological and unworthy of serious consideration.

Got that? We’re odious because we think our values, our way of approaching the world and its problems are correct, and those of conservatives are wrong. That seems not so much condescending as basic logic. Should we be liberal because we think those values are incorrect? Wouldn’t this logic in fact suggest that the author doesn’t even think his own views are valid, or at least not based on solid reasoning? If so, why would the Post run such a piece?

And yes, there are occasions when conservatives seem to be shunning established science and fact, or willfully ignoring the views of experts for their own non-expert, politicized ends. So what is so bad about finding that wrong?

Ezra Klein, himself a member of the Post’s op-ed page, wondered on Twitter: “Would the Post have published a piece entitled ‘why conservatives are morons?’ Genuinely curious.” Similar sentiments were voiced after the Allen piece was published: Would the Post have published a piece suggesting all Asians are stupid? All Jews?

It’s a preposterous premise. And, just like the Allen piece, it’s just as offensive that the editors there chose to single out a specific group as worthy of derision as it is that one person wrote the piece to begin with. These pieces pass through many hands on their way to the page, and it’s so disheartening that no one in that chain spoke up loud enough to say, “Do we really want to alienate people this way?”


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    RE:Similar sentiments were voiced after the Allen piece was published: Would the Post have published a piece suggesting all Asians are stupid? All Jews?

    Half the american voters are stupid…I’m not saying which half

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm a Los Angeles-based writer and editor focusing on pop and politics, race and culture, and where Gen-Yers fit into it all. My writing has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the Christian Science Monitor, WashingtonPost.com, the San Francisco Chronicle and People magazine. Among other things, I'm Oregon-born, hip-hop-addicted, and weirdly optimistic that the journalism business will stay alive.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 204
    Contributor Since: September 2009
    Location:Los Angeles

    What I'm Up To

    Check Me Out

    … in Salon, where I contribute to the Broadsheet blog.

    … in Slate, where I’ve recently written an assessment piece on California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman; and ranted about why female journalists in movies are so lame.

    … or in the Christian Science Monitor, where I discussed Gen Y views on originality and plagiarism; and sized up Disney’s progress in representing race on the big screen.