What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Dec. 24 2009 - 2:23 am | 35 views | 0 recommendations | 1 comment

Schwarzenegger Asks Supreme Court (Again) to Intervene in Prisons Case

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California (...

Image by AFP/Getty Images via Daylife

On the night before Christmas Eve, Arnold Schwarzenegger reminded the U.S. Supreme Court of what he really wanted: review from the highest court in a case involving California’s dilapidated prisons system. The governor submitted papers Tuesday night pleading with the court to take up the case – he already filed an appeal earlier this fall.

The dispute stems from a ruling by three federal judges that the state take quick action to relieve its bulging-at-the-seams prison population by tens of thousands. It found that prisoners were being denied proper access to health care in violation of the Constitution. The judges acknowledged the state’s economic woes, but ultimately found that “the evidence is compelling that there is no relief other than a prisoner release order that will remedy the unconstitutional prison conditions.”

But Schwarzenegger believes the ruling is an affront to California’s right to run the correctional system itself – and its right to control its own budget.

The court will consider the request on Jan. 15. If it takes up the case, it would likely halt Schwarzenegger’s most current release plan until at least June, when the court issues the bulk of its decisions.

The governor’s latest plan involves diverting thousands of inmates to local jails or house arrest, the latter of which, along with electronic monitoring is being touted as “the future of criminal justice — a way to supervise offenders in the community without incurring the social, financial, and community costs of incarceration” according to The American Prospect’s Adam Serwer.

This seems an even more viable solution when one considers a recent paper on the unintended consequences of prison reform (using mostly southern states as a model) that found welfare was often cut to pay for correctional expenditures that racked up as a result of population reduction orders.  Writes UC Hastings law professor Hadar Aviram:

The irony, of course, is that prison reform and welfare target mostly people of the same social class, and once conditions improve and the population is released, folks come out to a world that offers them little in the way of help and assistance.

These are, obviously, heady issues that Schwarzenegger will get to delay sorting through for a little longer if John Roberts and Co. give the Governator the gift of Supreme Court review.


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm a Los Angeles-based writer and editor focusing on pop and politics, race and culture, and where Gen-Yers fit into it all. My writing has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, the Christian Science Monitor, WashingtonPost.com, the San Francisco Chronicle and People magazine. Among other things, I'm Oregon-born, hip-hop-addicted, and weirdly optimistic that the journalism business will stay alive.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 204
    Contributor Since: September 2009
    Location:Los Angeles

    What I'm Up To

    Check Me Out

    … in Salon, where I contribute to the Broadsheet blog.

    … in Slate, where I’ve recently written an assessment piece on California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman; and ranted about why female journalists in movies are so lame.

    … or in the Christian Science Monitor, where I discussed Gen Y views on originality and plagiarism; and sized up Disney’s progress in representing race on the big screen.