What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Mar. 19 2010 - 1:32 pm | 185 views | 0 recommendations | 3 comments

The Economics of Cheating

A Toyota Prius hybrid taxi in New York City.

Image via Wikipedia

My latest column on Money & Your Mind over at SmartMoney.com. In this week’s column, I look at cheating cabbies in New York:

In recent weeks, New Yorkers have been shocked, shocked to find out that taxi drivers have been taking them for a ride in both the literal and figurative sense. Using GPS technology installed in cabs a couple years ago, New York City’s Taxi and Limousine Commission discovered nearly two million trips over a 26-month period where passengers were illegally charged a higher out-of-city rate (80 cents per fifth of a mile as opposed to 40 cents per fifth of a mile) for trips within the five boroughs. The overcharges totaled more than $8 million, averaging out to $4.45 per trip.

As shocking as some people find this taxi gouging, however, the real surprise is just how little cabbies were cheating. Those two million overcharged trips made up just 0.5% of the 361 million taxi trips during that time period. With cheating as easy as flipping a switch on their meters, the real question is why cabbies weren’t doing it all the time.

We’re all presented with countless opportunities to screw over our fellow human beings. How easy would it be to shoplift? How easy would it be to dine-and-dash at a restaurant you’ll never visit again? How many office supplies could you theoretically fit in your bag?

Given that, why don’t people cheat far more than they do? While a traditional model of cheating would say that people should be expected to cheat as much as is rational — assessing the chances of getting caught, multiplying them by the penalty for getting caught, and then weighing this against what can be gained by breaking the rules — the truth is that’s not how we work. Instead, research in psychology, neuroeconomics, and behavioral economics has shown that two factors other than fear of getting caught seem to restrain our behavior: our desire to adhere to social norms and our desire to see ourselves as good people.

We like to cheat. We don’t like to think of ourselves as cheaters.


Comments

3 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm a freelance writer and blogger based in Brooklyn, NY. My background is mostly in politics. I've worked on the editorial boards of the New York Sun and New York Post. In 2006, I wrote a book, "The Elephant in the Room: Evangelicals, Libertarians, and the Battle to Control the Republican Party" (Wiley). I've also done my share of freelancing, for places like the Atlantic Monthly, The New York Times, Reason, and RealClearPolitics.

    These days, I'm interested in humanity's ever-expanding understanding of its own irrationality. Hence, this blog.

    Comments, questions, news tips, creative verbal abuse, etc. can be sent to: editor-at-ryansager.com.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 299
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:Brooklyn, NY

    What I'm Up To

    • Follow Neuroworld on…

      stumble

      reddit-256x256

       
    • The Elephant in the Room

      My book about the collapse of the Republican Party.

      To buy, click here.

       
    • This is a picture of a lemur

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    • +O
    >.