Independents Don’t Exist

Image via Wikipedia

Or, at least, they barely do:

Many Americans, especially middle class and better educated ones, call themselves independent and citizens who choose the better candidate regardless of party affiliation. Their numbers seem to have increased in recent decades to nearly 40% of the electorate. The description and estimate are misleading. Very few Americans lack a party preference. Our largely unchanged high levels of party voting and the willingness of most ‘‘independents’’ to acknowledge a party preference after a bit of probing indicates that independence is more a matter of self-presentation than an accurate statement about our approach to elections, candidates, the parties, and politics in general. Most of the independents in national surveys and most of the increase in their numbers are contributed by ‘‘leaners’’ (those who initially describe themselves as independents but then acknowledge a preference for either the Democrats or Republicans). Leaners are partisans. Characterizing them as independents underestimates the partisanship of Americans and leads to inaccurate estimates of party effects and the responsiveness of the electorate to short-term electoral forces.

As this Miller-McCune article lays out, the true number is probably around 15% or fewer. And as for the “idea of the sage citizen who eschews party affiliation, is unbiased and persuadable by reason and facts” — well, if you read this blog you probably know I’d peg the number of these kinds of citizens near or at zero.

HT: The Monkey Cage