What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Apr. 10 2009 - 2:31 pm | 216 views | 0 recommendations | 4 comments

Anti-Marriage Ads: Scared Straight

video management, video solution, video streaming

I’ve been thinking a bit about the ad above today — from the National Organization for Marriage — and why it’s got people so riled-up in the pro-gay-marriage community (a community I’m a part of).

I think the reason is simple: It’s pretty effective at what it’s trying to do. That is, of course, to stoke fear of gay marriage and a world in which straight people will be oppressed by gays.

Now, we already know a little about homophobia. It tends to be correlated with latent homosexual desire (hence all the religious-right people who end up stumbling out of the closet high on meth with their pants around their ankles). We know that, in men, it’s correlated with feeling one’s masculinity is threatened. But old-fashioned homophobia is enough on the wane in America that gay-marriage opponents now need something else.

Unable to simply run ads of leather-clad men prancing around at gay-pride parades (inducing fear of The Other), they now have to find a way to make us (straight people) feel threatened personally.

In order to fully understand what’s going on in this ad, you need to start with the concept of mortality salience. Basically, mortality salience is the idea that being reminded of the fact of death (i.e. one’s own mortality) can essentially prime people into a different mindset —one which makes them more likely to fear other races, religions, and nations; which makes them prefer charismatic over pragmatic leaders; and which heightens their attraction to traditional mores.

Take, for instance, these findings from an experiment during the 2004 presidential election between George W. Bush and John F. Kerry:

(a) Suppose that people are merely reminded of their own mortality–by being asked, for example, to describe “what you think will happen to you as you physically die and once you are physically dead.” After that reminder, and in answering seemingly unrelated questions, they showed stronger support for President Bush and his policies in Iraq.

(b) After people were reminded either of their mortality or of the September 11 attacks, they became more favorably disposed toward Bush and less favorably disposed toward John Kerry.

(c) Both mortality salience and a reminder of the September 11 attacks had similar effects–in increasing support for Bush among liberals and conservatives alike. Astonishingly, the reference to the terrorist attacks increased support for Bush among liberals even more than among conservatives.

Pretty strong stuff.

In another mortality salience experiment, male subjects were approached by a pretty research assistant while crossing a dangerous rope bridge. Those who got her number (she gave it as part of the experiment) while on the bridge, as opposed to once they were safely across, called four times more often.

So, fear can really affect how we process the world — and how we act in response to that processing.

What does this ad do to spark fear, or mortality salience? Well, the entire ominous “storm” motif is pretty sinister, with dark clouds and strikes of lightning. And there’s the nice touch at the end, where the sun comes out as a spokesman promises that a “rainbow coalition of love” will come together to fend off teh gays.

Then, there’s the text, put in the mouths of various actors of various races and genders: “There’s a storm gathering. The clouds are dark, and the winds are strong. And I am afraid.” The “I am afraid” line, the most direct appeal to fear, is read by a pretty, innocent-looking, young African American woman (perhaps even meant to evoke instincts of protection in males, empathy in females). And the kicker toward the end: “The storm is coming.”

You are going to die.

Now, don’t get me wrong. This isn’t mind control. And there’s nothing more nefarious going on here than in hundreds (thousands?) of ads that run every day. When the ad’s supporting something you like, you’ll just think it’s clever and well-produced; if it’s supporting something you don’t like, it’ll seem nefarious.

Still, it’s worth understanding how these things work. And understanding when people are appealing to your fear rather than your reason.


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 4 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    [...] seeing panic on the part of the anti-gay-marriage forces because they realize this storm is coming. There have [...]

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
 

About Me

I'm a freelance writer and blogger based in Brooklyn, NY. My background is mostly in politics. I've worked on the editorial boards of the New York Sun and New York Post. In 2006, I wrote a book, "The Elephant in the Room: Evangelicals, Libertarians, and the Battle to Control the Republican Party" (Wiley). I've also done my share of freelancing, for places like the Atlantic Monthly, The New York Times, Reason, and RealClearPolitics.

These days, I'm interested in humanity's ever-expanding understanding of its own irrationality. Hence, this blog.

Comments, questions, news tips, creative verbal abuse, etc. can be sent to: editor-at-ryansager.com.

See my profile »
Followers: 250
Contributor Since: January 2009
Location:Brooklyn, NY

What I'm Up To

  • Follow Neuroworld on…

    stumble

    reddit-256x256

     
  • The Elephant in the Room

    My book about the collapse of the Republican Party.

    To buy, click here.

     
  • This is a picture of a lemur

     
.<
  • +O
  • +O
  • +O
>.