What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Apr. 8 2009 - 11:46 pm | 199 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

Well, No S–t!

swearing in cartoon

A new study, “The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words” (HTML in-press version here; abstract and pay version here), looks at the psychology of swearing: Why do we do it? What does it mean when we do? And why does it feel so f—–g good?

From the paper:

A set of 10 words that has remained stable over the past 20 years accounts for 80% of public swearing. Swearing is positively correlated with extraversion and Type A hostility but negatively correlated with agreeableness, conscientiousness, religiosity, and sexual anxiety. The uniquely human facility for swearing evolved and persists because taboo words can communicate emotion information (anger, frustration) more readily than nontaboo words, allowing speakers to achieve a variety of personal and social goals with them (utility).

Yes, for the easily amused, the paper does go on to list the 10 words (bottom of page 12). A couple of them are just blasphemous religious utterances (oh my god, Jesus Christ, etc.); and even a few of the others can now be heard regularly on prime time TV.

Still, while I’m no prude, it’s good to keep a few of them off-limits. Otherwise, they’re no damn fun to say (oops, damn is another one of those all-but-domesticated ones). And they stop performing the functions they’re supposed to perform [err... taboo words ahead]:

We do more than just say swear words; there are specific categories of use that fall under the rubric of swearing. Besides literal or denotative uses (We fucked), the primary use of swearing is for emotional connotation, which occurs in the form of epithets or as insults directed toward others. Epithets are offensive emotional outbursts of single words or phrases used to express the speaker’s frustration, anger, or surprise (Holy shit! Fuck me!). Two-thirds of our swearing data are linked to personal and interpersonal expressions of anger and frustration, which seem to be the main reason for swearing. Insulting forms of taboo word use include name calling and put downs (asshole, bitch) and cursing or wishing harm on someone (e.g., fuck off, eat shit and die). Taboo words are a defining feature of sexual harassment, blasphemy, obscene phone calls, discrimination, hate speech and verbal abuse categories.

Some might ask: Why study swearing at all? Aside from the obvious-if-juvenile pleasure of getting all these words into Perspectives on Psychological Science. The researchers have an answer — or, really, a series of questions they hope might be answered:

Why do some Touretters swear and others do not? Do monolinguals and bilinguals process taboo words similarly? How did we evolve the
capability to swear in the first place? Are there analogous mechanisms in subhuman primates [rs: the idea of primate swearing? pretty awesome.]? … What happens during catharsis; do swear words provide more relief than euphemisms? Can swearing alleviate acute or chronic pain? Does swearing interfere with executive control? If words harm people, how do we measure harm?

Speaking as someone who stubs his toe a lot, I can answer at least one of these questions off the bat: Swearing can alleviate acute pain. As for the others: f—-d if I know.

Image via Wikipedia


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Actually, expletives are the most versatile words in the lexicon. We use them because they can serve almost any purpose, but particularly, I think, for the cathartic effect their use can produce.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm a freelance writer and blogger based in Brooklyn, NY. My background is mostly in politics. I've worked on the editorial boards of the New York Sun and New York Post. In 2006, I wrote a book, "The Elephant in the Room: Evangelicals, Libertarians, and the Battle to Control the Republican Party" (Wiley). I've also done my share of freelancing, for places like the Atlantic Monthly, The New York Times, Reason, and RealClearPolitics.

    These days, I'm interested in humanity's ever-expanding understanding of its own irrationality. Hence, this blog.

    Comments, questions, news tips, creative verbal abuse, etc. can be sent to: editor-at-ryansager.com.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 299
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:Brooklyn, NY

    What I'm Up To

    • Follow Neuroworld on…

      stumble

      reddit-256x256

       
    • The Elephant in the Room

      My book about the collapse of the Republican Party.

      To buy, click here.

       
    • This is a picture of a lemur

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    • +O
    >.