<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who stole my Boston marathon spot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:14:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mattinsiouxfalls</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>mattinsiouxfalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/?p=777#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Yeah, just don&#039;t tinker with the men&#039;s times quite yet.  I turned 40 just for those extra five minutes.  Now if I can simply match my PR from ten years ago, I am so in (maybe).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, just don&#8217;t tinker with the men&#8217;s times quite yet.  I turned 40 just for those extra five minutes.  Now if I can simply match my PR from ten years ago, I am so in (maybe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Who stole my Boston marathon spot? - Running Shorts - - True/Slant -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Who stole my Boston marathon spot? - Running Shorts - - True/Slant -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/?p=777#comment-230</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NickiinNY and Boston News 360, Megan Kretz. Megan Kretz said: Who stole my Boston Marathon spot? http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NickiinNY and Boston News 360, Megan Kretz. Megan Kretz said: Who stole my Boston Marathon spot? <a href="http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/" rel="nofollow">http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">Alma Liebrecht</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">Alma Liebrecht</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/?p=777#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t deny the charity runners their chance.  After all, raising that much money is quite a difficult task!  I do agree about making the qualifying standards for women faster though.  Perhaps 3:35?  That would make it more equivalent to the men&#039;s qualifying standard.  In the end, it will just motivate more women to run faster, since 90% of the women that sneek in under 3:41, are probably capable of running 3:35.  There&#039;s nothing more motivating that a fixed qualifying standard.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t deny the charity runners their chance.  After all, raising that much money is quite a difficult task!  I do agree about making the qualifying standards for women faster though.  Perhaps 3:35?  That would make it more equivalent to the men&#8217;s qualifying standard.  In the end, it will just motivate more women to run faster, since 90% of the women that sneek in under 3:41, are probably capable of running 3:35.  There&#8217;s nothing more motivating that a fixed qualifying standard.  <img src='http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beerzie</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/2010/01/29/who-stole-my-boston-marathon-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>beerzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/runningshorts/?p=777#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Too bad you didn&#039;t get in, but no one stole your spot. The event, like many events marathon and non-marathon, has gotten more popular. Excluding charity runners looking to enjoy the experience just so &quot;more deserving&quot; runners are allowed in has more than a whiff of snobbery. It&#039;s the new normal; grow up and deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad you didn&#8217;t get in, but no one stole your spot. The event, like many events marathon and non-marathon, has gotten more popular. Excluding charity runners looking to enjoy the experience just so &#8220;more deserving&#8221; runners are allowed in has more than a whiff of snobbery. It&#8217;s the new normal; grow up and deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

