What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Oct. 28 2009 - 9:10 pm | 26 views | 2 recommendations | 3 comments

Pelosi accepts defeat on robust public option

b-pelosi-012609-jason-reed-reutersIn what had already been shaping up as a bad week for the public insurance option, things just got decidedly worse.

The Hill is reporting that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi will announce tomorrow that she does not have the votes to pass a health care bill with a robust public option and will go with the version proposed by the Congressional Blue Dog conservatives.

The public option proposed by House conservative Democrats – and agreed to in the compromise bill presented by the Energy & Commerce Committee – requires the administrators of a government health insurer to negotiate rates individually with hospitals and doctors rather than presetting payments at Medicare rates (the ‘robust’ option) or Medicare rates plus 5%.

While Speaker Pelosi has been steadfast in her commitment to producing a bill with the more liberal public insurance plan, the vote count leaking out of a meeting of House liberals today revealed that there are 47 Democrats against the robust option or Medicare plus 5% options with 8 more leaning towards no, leaving Pelosi short of the 218 votes she needs to get it done.

While many Congressional progressives, who had previously threatened to vote against any bill that did not include the public option based on Medicare rates, were staying silent, the co-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), commented -

I am not rolling over. I will insist on a Medicare-plus-5 [percent] amendment on the floor so that the full caucus can vote on it. We are hopeful that the Rules Committee will allow this amendment, which has tremendous public support, to be voted on for the record.
Via The Hill

But Grijalva’s fellow co-chairwoman, Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), was a bit more temperate in her response to the development.

When we see what the bill says, we’ll decide if we can support it. This isn’t walk-away time.

The public insurance plan that will now be included in the House bill is estimated to cost $85 billion more than the version based on Medicare rates and represents a significant setback for Speaker Pelosi who has continuously promised that she had the votes for the public option she wanted.


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 3 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Public option with Medicare rates was DOA. Everyone in healthcare knows they are too low and the only way Medicare rates work is if you can “cost shift” the loss on Medicare to the private insurance market.

  2. collapse expand

    “represents a significant setback for Speaker Pelosi”

    I think that’s a bit of an over reach Rick to claim this is a significant setback for the speaker. It was always known that the medicare rate was always the price for blue dog support and the bill put out this morning includes a public option, comes in under target, and reduces the deficit. Sorry that pretty much sounds like a win for both the speaker and the Democratic caucus.

  3. collapse expand

    Grijalva has no influence or credibility. The only time he gets press is when he slings mud.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I am an attorney in Southern California, and a frequent writer, speaker and consultant on health care policy and politics. To that end, I am active member of the Association of Health Care Journalists. Based in beautiful Santa Monica, California, I'm very pleased to have the opportunity to be a contributing editor to True/Slant. I've recently finished a book designed to make the health care debate understandable to the average reader, and expect it to be out in the next five months or earlier. In my 'spare time', I continue to write for television and, occasionally, for comic books.

    My checkered past includes stints in creative writing and production for television where I did strange things like founding the long running show "Access Hollywood" and serving, for many years, as the president of the Marvel Character Group where I had the distinct pleasure of being one of Spider-man's bosses.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 333
    Contributor Since: February 2009
    Location:Santa Monica,CA

    What I'm Up To

    Media inquiries:

    Melissa Van Fleet

    Ken Lindner & Associates, Inc.
    2029 Century Park East, Suite 1000
    Los Angeles, California 90067

    310-277-9223