What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Oct. 25 2009 - 4:55 pm | 1,562 views | 5 recommendations | 4 comments

Senator Evan Bayh – a wolf in sheep’s clothing

U.S. Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana.

Image via Wikipedia

Yesterday’s post here at The Policy Page described Senator Evan Bayh’s huge conflict of interest in the health care reform debate. As the Democratic Senator likely to represent the 60th procedural vote that could block a Republican filibuster of a reform bill, I discussed how profoundly disturbing it is that Senator’s Bayh’s wife, Susan, sits on the board of directors of WellPoint – the nation’s largest (by membership) for profit health insurance company. I also noted that Mrs. Bayh’s currently held stock options in the company – which would likely take a significant financial hit should a public option succeed – represent a significant percentage of the family’s net worth.

While the piece garnered some readers here at True/Slant, I continue to be surprised by how little coverage this matter is receiving from the national media. While the subject has popped up, from time to time, we now know just how important Sen. Bayh’s vote is likely to be and how much this clear conflict of interest could weigh on the result. Still, the mainstream media remains remarkably silent on this, including the more liberal skewing news organizations.

Why is Bayh getting a pass?

Is the silence due to a presumption that, as a finalist on the Obama vice-presidential short list, Bayh must be a progressive Democrat who should not be picked on? He ‘s not.

Is it the boyish  good looks that leads to a conclusion that a face like that could never be guilty of bad behavior? He is. (see the 1997 report, “Judicial Watch Files Complaint against Indiana Senator Evan Bayh with Senate Ethics Committee.”) This complaint involved Bayh’s failure to disclose his position as a director of his family foundation.

Maybe it’s the warm feelings progressives have for Bayh’s father, Senator Birch Bayh, who was responsible for some of our most important, progressive legislation including Title IX to the Higher Education Act, giving women equal opportunities in sports and education in public universities, and the hugely important Equal Rights Amendment, initially sponsored in the Senate by Birch Bayh.

Make no mistake – Evan Bayh is not his father…not even close.

If you are not clear on this, take a look the words Bayh spoke on the floor of the United States Senate on October 8, 2002, in support of President Bush’s rush into Iraq-

It is an honor and privilege for me to join today with my distinguished colleagues, Senator Warner, Senator McCain, and my good friend, Senator Lieberman, in support of this resolution granting the President of the United States the authority to defend our country.
I favor this resolution because in a world where we have rogue regimes possessing weapons of mass death, and suicidal terrorists who are all too eager to use them against us, weapons of that nature in the hands of a regime such as Saddam Hussein’s represents an unacceptable risk to the safety and well-being of the American people.
As much as I wish we could ignore this threat, it is my heartfelt conviction that in all conscience we cannot.
Finally, along with my colleagues, I support this resolution because I believe we must learn the terrible lessons from the tragedy of September 11, foremost among which is that we waited too long to address the gathering danger in Afghanistan. If we had acted sooner, perhaps–just perhaps–we could have saved 3,000 innocent lives: men, women, and children. We waited too long to act. Let us not make that mistake again.
Via Irregular Times

Later, on the same day, Bayh warned Americans that tens of thousands of mid-westerners could die from smallpox as a result of Iraq’s biological weapons of mass destruction if Bush were not given the go-ahead to invade.

Does that sound like a familiar tactic by a certain American political party? Scare the hell out of people in the effort to win their hearts and minds, even if it’s a big lie (there was no smallpox weapon of mass destruction in Iraq – at least not one we or anyone else could ever find.)

And there is so much more.

But I’m saving it. Until the national media begins reporting on Evan Bayh being the Senator with the most to personally gain from defeating a public option while holding the key vote in the success or failure of that effort, I plan to continue reporting on Bayh’s history as someone who actually makes Joe Lieberman look like a Democrat – and we all know how ridiculous a notion that is.


Comments

2 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 4 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Rick, please don’t stop pointing out problems with our elected officials, because it is becoming obvious the blogs are the only “reporting” that happens in this country because of all the money connections between the mainstream media and the political parties.

  2. collapse expand

    I completely agree about your comments on Bayh’s unethical connection to income from the current healthcare system, and his being able to vote on health care reform (why isn’t it called health care INSURANCE reform, by the way?). I do not know why the media is not picking up on it. The only thing I can think of, is that the media does not see him as a player worth noting. And Indiana is reluctant to give up the “golden boy” image he projects and start seriously pondering the truth (no coincidence that Indiana’s literacy rate is also very low).

  3. collapse expand

    [...] Ungar has been covering the conflicts of interest of Democratic Senator Evan Bayh: Yesterday’s post here at The Policy [...]

  4. collapse expand

    I just heard about this yesterday, Oct. 28, on the Rachel Maddow show. Senator Leiberman supposedly has ties to the health insurance industry as well and stands to benefit financially if a public option does not pass. What is amazing is that these elected officials are allowed to vote on an issue that will result in personal huge financial rewards. Why is this not a conflict of interest. This level of corruption is truly appalling. Who’s interest is main street media protecting?

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
 

About Me

I am an attorney in Southern California, and a frequent writer, speaker and consultant on health care policy and politics. To that end, I am active member of the Association of Health Care Journalists. Based in beautiful Santa Monica, California, I'm very pleased to have the opportunity to be a contributing editor to True/Slant. I've recently finished a book designed to make the health care debate understandable to the average reader, and expect it to be out in the next five months or earlier. In my 'spare time', I continue to write for television and, occasionally, for comic books.

My checkered past includes stints in creative writing and production for television where I did strange things like founding the long running show "Access Hollywood" and serving, for many years, as the president of the Marvel Character Group where I had the distinct pleasure of being one of Spider-man's bosses.

See my profile »
Followers: 220
Contributor Since: February 2009
Location:Santa Monica,CA

What I'm Up To

L.A. Speaking Tour

The Los Angeles Seniors Federation speaking tour is underway. My next stop is on November 10th. If you’re interested in discussing what health care reform means to you, let me know and I’ll provide you with attendance information.