What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Jun. 8 2009 - 12:58 pm | 2 views | 0 recommendations | 0 comments

Globe union vote: heart or head?

My former colleagues at the Boston Globe face an impossible choice today: Vote yes on the proposed contract with the New York Times and take a crippling ten percent wage cut or vote no and perhaps face an unimaginable 23 percent pay cut. I don’t envy them. A yes vote will save the paper and jobs, at least temporarily. A no vote goes out on a limb that the Times will go back to the negotiating table. Some say the possibility of reopening negotiations is as likely an blizzard in the Sahara.

The voices of those voting no have been well-represented. This from the report in today’s Times:

“People understand that things are going horrendously, the paper is losing money and there have to be concessions, but people don’t feel that the company tried very hard to make the concessions more palatable or equitable,” said Scott Allen, a Globe reporter. “I’m voting no. Even people who you would think can’t afford to put their mortgages at risk are voting no.”

via Boston Globe Employees to Vote on Cutbacks – NYTimes.com.

However, there is no quote from anyone who is voting yes. I got this email from a friend who sees things differently. This well-respected journalist is one of those can’t afford to put the mortgage at risk. My friend has taken a clear-eyed look at the industry as well as the history of labor negotiations with the Times and is voting yes. These thoughts bear consideration and should have been reported today.

Many people who are going to be royally screwed by this are voting no because they think it’s the right way to show dissatisfaction with the perceived inequity between management and workers. They’re thinking with their hearts and not their heads. A “no” vote is the equivalent of a toddler stamping his feet and wailing “That’s not fair.” There’s no way the company is going to give into that, especially since all the other unions accepted terms equally onerous, if not moreso.

Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. And here’s my friend’s coda, sad but true: “It’s an utter shitstorm.”


Comments

No Comments Yet
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS
 

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I spent a good chunk of my adult life as an arts reporter/critic/columnist for the Boston Globe. Among other things, I covered the cultural wars of the early 1990s (remember Mapplethorpe?), reviewed theater, and profiled all sorts of interesting characters. I also wrote an early column about online culture, which led me to become one of the first online war correspondents during the conflict in Kosovo, an odd but exhilarating gig for an arts maven. While I was a fellow in the National Arts Journalism program, a colleague handed me a gloomy article called “Print is Dead.” I eventually got the message and took a buyout from the Globe in 2001. I had vague dreams of saving the world, but instead had three kids in 17 months. Therein lies my newfound interest in public education. I am hoping to create a dialogue about what’s wrong, what’s right, and what’s up in our schools today.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 52
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:Be where you are

    What I'm Up To

    Innovation

    Here’s a piece on new ideas in education, in the Boston Globe Magazine.