What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Jul. 13 2010 - 11:18 am | 224 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

BP well is capped – but not plugged

BP well. July 13, 2010 (Photo by BP)

A communication breakdown last evening left many people believing that the BP well that has been gushing oil out of control for 83 days had been plugged.

It hadn’t.

The image above, taken this morning from a video streaming from one of many remotely operated vehicles (ROV) at the site shows oil continuing to flow into the Gulf of Mexico.

The confusion appears to have begun with a remark made earlier Monday by National Incident Commander Admiral Thad Allen.

“Significant progress has been made on the capping stack installation,” said Allen, referring to the new cap with a tighter seal that, officials hope, will allow BP to contain most if not all of the oil coming from the well.

Later, there were unofficial reports that the cap had been “successfully installed.” The word “success” coupled with the fact that for a period of time only one of the many ROV cameras showed the oil spewing, and indistinctly at first, led to the belief that the flow of oil had at last been stopped.

BP’s new cap in place. It appears all the oil in being contained,” read one overly-optimistic, but typical, tweet.

A civilian employee of the Coast Guard, reached by phone at the government’s Joint Information Center, told me that the Skandi 2 ROV camera “appears to show oil is leaking.” (She did not want to be identified because she is not an official spokesperson for the JIC.)

Later, BP issued a press release stating that the new “capping stack” had been installed at 7 PM CDT.

The statement from BP indicates that until testing is completed nothing conclusive can be said about whether or not the stack will actually work. The tests, however, are not designed to examine the stack itself. BP is attempting to determine the condition of the well casement below the sea floor. Serious damage there could make full containment above the wellhead impossible, reinforcing the importance of the twin relief wells that are still being drilled.

The communication problems that have plagued the operation since the Deepwater Horizon exploded in April, continue to add to the general confusion and mistrust of the oil giant. While there was nothing wrong with Allen’s statement, in its late Monday press release, BP once again muddied the waters (so to speak).

The test, BP stated early in the release, “will be be a minimum of 6 hours and could extend up to 48 hours…”

If you interpreted that statement to mean that the test will take between 6 and 48 hours, you have not been paying enough attention to BP’s use of the English language.

Nearly a hundred words later, the press release explains that, depending on circumstances, BP may decide to extend “the test duration beyond 48 hours.”

Forty-eight hours is the lower end of the upper end of the test duration, which has no upper upper end.

Clear? As drilling mud.


2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    Following the money, BP’s objective here ought to be making certain that no-one can contradict their low-ball estimates of how much oil has already flowed into the gulf, because that number determines their financial liability. So their best outcome would be that this scheme stops the oil flowing into the gulf through the blown-out well-head, and that the other well they are drilling blocks the source lower down so it can be diverted and collected for processing and sale. That may be their objective, but we’ll see how it plays out.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I'm an investigative reporter and author living in the northern Sonoran Desert (Phoenix). I've been a regular contributor to Rolling Stone, Mother Jones, New York Times, LA Times, Salon, The Nation, and many other national publications.

    In addition to my Solar Plexus, I'm a correspondent for OnEarth (the NRDC's magazine), contributor to several other online sites, and publisher and editor of El Phoenix Sun, a blog covering solar power and environmental news from the American Southwest.

    I'm addicted to #twitter. Please #help me #score by #following @thephoenixsun.

    I've written several screenplays. One of them actually made it to the screen; the IMAX documentary, "Coral Reef Adventure."

    My books reflect either my eclectic interests or a short attention span, depending on whether you believe me or my wife:

    Broken Heartland (Farm crisis and rural issues)

    Under Fire (The NRA and gun control)

    The Best of Enemies (Race, class and redemption in the New South)

    The Enchanted Braid (Coral reefs)

    Fire in the Turtle House (Sea turtles and ocean issues)

    Enchanted by Prairie (The original Midwest ecosystem)

    For more:

    www.oshadavidson.com, www.thephoenixsun.com, and (always) @thephoenixsun

    See my profile »
    Followers: 44
    Contributor Since: August 2009
    Location:Phoenix, AZ

    What I'm Up To

    Editing my photographs of the Arizona Anti-Immigration Law rally. (Below: Srta. Libertad)