What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Sep. 9 2009 - 9:19 am | 26 views | 0 recommendations | 3 comments

Let’s stop using the term “fixer.”

I am among the many grateful for the rescue of New York Times journalist Stephen Farrell by British forces. He and his fixer, Sultan Munadi had been abducted in Afghanistan this week while trying to cover the NATO air-strike on a hijacked fuel convoy that led to civilian deaths.

Sultan Munadi was killed.  As was one British soldier.

Munadi was an Afghan student, studying public policy at a German university. He was “fixing” for The New York Times to make money during a break.  (I never knew him personally; Steve is a friendly acquaintance.)

I’ve always hated the term “fixer.”  I used to be one – in Cambodia, where I faced NONE of the danger and demands that Afghan fixers face day to day.

A fixer is responsible for everything: from hiring a car, to booking an interview, to – importantly, determining WHOM to interview – and getting the visiting journalist there to make it all happen.

Let’s be clear: Steve Farrell is an enormously experienced journalist, with plenty of Afghanistan and Iraq under his belt – and I’m among the many who respect his work. In fact, he’s so dedicated that he has earned himself the nickname of “Robo-Hack.”

But depending on the journalist one is working with, it’s the fixer who runs the show.

There were times in Cambodia where I used to take some visiting correspondent, tell them A) who we’d interview, B) why that person is important, and C) what questions to be sure to ask – all so the “reporter” could walk away with a story.  (I fixed for television, a wonderful medium when it’s done right, but it does involve some smoke-and-mirrors that can cover for a journalist’s lack of knowledge and experience.)

That, of course, was after I ran the 45 errands to impress the interviewee about the merits of the visiting correspondent, convincing him/her why he/she should do the interview in the first place.

And for this, I made $150/day, while the visiting correspondent sailed into a five-star hotel, ate off his per-diem, and used my knowledge and experience to sail out again, with his six-figure salary?


So you know what I did?  I quit.  I announced at a certain point that I would no longer fix. I would report.  Fixing is exploitative, and more than that – once you’re a good fixer, others in the industry want you to forever remain a good fixer – you actually become too valuable to promote.

As an English-speaking, educated, American working overseas, I was in the position to start hustling for reporting jobs – the next rung up.  I became a “stringer” for several news organizations  (a paid-per-story contributing reporter) , and from there, a retainered reporter, and from there, a correspondent.

That’s a career path that may be open to some local reporters, depending on language skills – but far from all.

As a reporter, I too, hire local journalists for assistance, booking interviews and translating.  And yes, in the developing world, “fixing” can be good money. But most local journalists I’ve worked with also have a strong belief in journalism and in their country.  By working with me, they would also be telling the world about the situation in their country.  And then the rest of the world would understand, and – maybe – do what it could to help.

I didn’t know Sultan Munadi, but I bet you that was part of what he thought. Working with The New York Times? That’s not an accident.

If it were up to me, we’d do away with the term “fixer.” A fixer in my mind is someone who might arrange a car, or get you a generator. Order food.  If  a local journalist is involved in determining editorial content, then he/ she is a producer.  A journalist.  A colleague.


3 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    Just a quick addendum: Two Afghan civilians were also killed in the rescue mission.

  2. collapse expand

    Good post. I’m agreed on the front that “fixer” is an amorphous term for people who do a lot of work – including, in many cases, the actual story. Never used one in an actual war zone, but it seems that the demands of working there go above & beyond the usual. Hopefully a new term will appear for ‘em someday.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I'm a freelance journalist and writer who has recently returned to the US after 17 years living overseas, primarily in Southeast Asia.

    In 1992, I went to Cambodia – then at the height of the UNTAC peacekeeping mission - to cut my teeth on journalism.

    ….I was in Hong Kong, for the 1997 Handover to Chinese rule; and then it was off to

    …..Indonesia - for the fall of President Suharto in 1998, through the the reformasi movement; the East Timor conflict, its independence ballot and peacekeeping mission; the fallout from September 11th in “the world’s most populous Muslim nation” and the Bali bomb, and myriad points in-between during a five and a half year span;

    …. and onwards to India, where I was Voice of America radio/television correspondent for South Asia between 2003 and 2006, which included rotations in Afghanistan and Iraq, along with my “patch” of India, including Kashmir; Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Bangladesh.

    I’ve freelanced my way in and out of Bosnia, Burma, Egypt, the Philippines, Pakistan, Thailand. I’ve also filed out of Vietnam and Malaysia.

    My name is Mary Patricia Nunan, and I vastly prefer “MP.” If you’ve heard me on the radio or seen me on tv – NPR, VOA, CBC, BBC or others -- it would have been as “Patricia Nunan.” I’ve never had much use for the “Mary.”

    See my profile »
    Followers: 30
    Contributor Since: August 2009
    Location:New York City