Miles OBrien on the Mr. Media Show
Post Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment
T/S Members
Log in with your True/Slant account.
Previously logged in with Facebook?
Log in to True/Slant with Facebook
You must be logged in to post a comment
Log in with your True/Slant account.
I am a 26-year broadcast news veteran - with nearly 17 years as CNN’s science, aerospace, technology and environment correspondent. I am an active pilot, airplane owner and a lover of all things that fly. I was slated to be the first journalist to fly on the space shuttle before the Columbia accident ended that dream. I am based in New York City - married with two teenagers and two dogs.
See my profile »| Followers: | 344 |
| Contributor Since: | February 2009 |
Getting ready for the Commerce Committee Hearing on the NASA FY2011 Budget.
Good interview Miles, and an excellent point about the Space Station being good science and bad PR. In a real sense I’ve always felt that JFK’s push to the moon (more about global politics than good science) really dealt a serious PR blow to NASA’s effort on near earth orbit missions, after the moon it’s hard to avoid a sense of “been there, done that” in regard to these missions.
Also NASA has done a piss poor job in explaining the complexities of space exploration. In an age when there is a new iPod released yearly NASA needs to do a better job at explaining why the turn around time for space projects are so seemingly long.
If you think about it, Hollywood is one of NASA’s biggest problems. All the amazing effects in science fiction movies over the years (warp drives and the like) have raised the expectation bar way too high.
In short, reality just doesn’t measure up to the the silver screen magic – and thus people are disappointed with NASA’s accomplishments in space.
In response to another comment. See in context »