<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rush on &#8216;Massa&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/</link>
	<description>[Please go to &#039;Settings&#039; to change your Tagline]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:26:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lynne</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8178</link>
		<dc:creator>lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8178</guid>
		<description>No shit Sherlock, with 20 million listeners, he can do what ever he wants to. You will be here with your trickle-up poverty, have fun. But you will have all the crap to reread from the big egos like Ames, Moore, Taibbi. When you all wake-up, I&#039;ll be back to read your comments. I&#039;ll be still LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No shit Sherlock, with 20 million listeners, he can do what ever he wants to. You will be here with your trickle-up poverty, have fun. But you will have all the crap to reread from the big egos like Ames, Moore, Taibbi. When you all wake-up, I&#8217;ll be back to read your comments. I&#8217;ll be still LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynne</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8113</link>
		<dc:creator>lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8113</guid>
		<description>Hard to read racist spin pinpointed on 1 disconnected comment ,that is meant to mislead. A True journalist takes the WHOLE set of facts and bases it in truth.  Maybe the blog should be called Racist/Slant, yes?  BTY, I would agree my writting skills could be better, but I&#039;m not a writer for Rolling Stone Mag. are you?   Better for you to see for yourself, watch Santellis videos on youtube, (600+) see what he really said about the banks etc.. The truth will help you see, there is something bigger going on here, it will be a rude awakening.(Even for you Matt.) Remember, Rick can be debated anytime on live T.V., I don&#039;t see it happening, and I don&#039;t see Rick hiding behind a blog. Actions speak louder then words! Let&#039;s see if (Taibbis) can put his actions where is mouth is! Matt has been on MSNBC, and his daddy works for NBC, Matt has no excuses, and top that with he REALLY,REALLY cares about you!        LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to read racist spin pinpointed on 1 disconnected comment ,that is meant to mislead. A True journalist takes the WHOLE set of facts and bases it in truth.  Maybe the blog should be called Racist/Slant, yes?  BTY, I would agree my writting skills could be better, but I&#8217;m not a writer for Rolling Stone Mag. are you?   Better for you to see for yourself, watch Santellis videos on youtube, (600+) see what he really said about the banks etc.. The truth will help you see, there is something bigger going on here, it will be a rude awakening.(Even for you Matt.) Remember, Rick can be debated anytime on live T.V., I don&#8217;t see it happening, and I don&#8217;t see Rick hiding behind a blog. Actions speak louder then words! Let&#8217;s see if (Taibbis) can put his actions where is mouth is! Matt has been on MSNBC, and his daddy works for NBC, Matt has no excuses, and top that with he REALLY,REALLY cares about you!        LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyb</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-2/#comment-8040</link>
		<dc:creator>garyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8040</guid>
		<description>Rush uses as little mental energy as possible to get his shows out, but folks, he is giving it everything that he&#039;s got! A system that are full of cholesterol and fat and such things make for a body and a brain that are not too quick on wit or a response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush uses as little mental energy as possible to get his shows out, but folks, he is giving it everything that he&#8217;s got! A system that are full of cholesterol and fat and such things make for a body and a brain that are not too quick on wit or a response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rneil</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8037</link>
		<dc:creator>rneil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8037</guid>
		<description>I always assumed Michael Medved was gay when I watched him on Sneak Previews. I was surprised when he reappeared on my television as a cultural crusader for the political right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always assumed Michael Medved was gay when I watched him on Sneak Previews. I was surprised when he reappeared on my television as a cultural crusader for the political right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cruss</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8035</link>
		<dc:creator>cruss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8035</guid>
		<description>Only Democrats could so foul up health care reform that I&#039;ll actually cheer if nothing gets done.

Nancy Pelosi: &quot;But we have to pass the bill so that you can, uh, find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.&quot;

Of course, there really is no bill, because they won&#039;t claim ownership of the Senate bill without some ethereal fixes they assure us they&#039;ll put in --  just like Obama assured us &quot;no mandate&quot; during the campaign, I suppose.

Matt, I read your short piece on the health care bill at Rolling Stone and have to disagree.  If this bill dies, I don&#039;t think health care reform dies.  It can&#039;t.  The current model can&#039;t continue for long.  And I don&#039;t think mandating people buy for-profit insurance is forcing anything on the insurers they don&#039;t very much want.  I feel passing this legislation is waving a white flag to Big Business and saying, &quot;We surrender.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only Democrats could so foul up health care reform that I&#8217;ll actually cheer if nothing gets done.</p>
<p>Nancy Pelosi: &#8220;But we have to pass the bill so that you can, uh, find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, there really is no bill, because they won&#8217;t claim ownership of the Senate bill without some ethereal fixes they assure us they&#8217;ll put in &#8212;  just like Obama assured us &#8220;no mandate&#8221; during the campaign, I suppose.</p>
<p>Matt, I read your short piece on the health care bill at Rolling Stone and have to disagree.  If this bill dies, I don&#8217;t think health care reform dies.  It can&#8217;t.  The current model can&#8217;t continue for long.  And I don&#8217;t think mandating people buy for-profit insurance is forcing anything on the insurers they don&#8217;t very much want.  I feel passing this legislation is waving a white flag to Big Business and saying, &#8220;We surrender.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mutex</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8026</link>
		<dc:creator>mutex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8026</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying that the entire military establishment will come &quot;crashing down&quot; if gays are allowed to serve openly in the military.  I am ASKING why heterosexual sexuality is looked at differently than homosexual sexuality.

If you think people are in an uproar over gays in the military imagine what would happen with unisex barracks and showers and subsequent reports of big black men rubbing up against virginal white girls while they&#039;re NAKED!

My point is that the importance given to sexuality in our society has never been logical so why do you expect this instance to be any different?

Also, have you noticed in all this talk about rubbing up against people it is virtually always about male sexuality.  I am pretty certain that just as much &#039;rubbing&#039; goes on in the lesbian community.

Lastly, I&#039;m not implying that homosexuals are more likely to engage in rape.  I&#039;m implying that they are just as likely.  We need to get past stereotypes and acknowledge people are people...with all the psycho-sexual illogic that entails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the entire military establishment will come &#8220;crashing down&#8221; if gays are allowed to serve openly in the military.  I am ASKING why heterosexual sexuality is looked at differently than homosexual sexuality.</p>
<p>If you think people are in an uproar over gays in the military imagine what would happen with unisex barracks and showers and subsequent reports of big black men rubbing up against virginal white girls while they&#8217;re NAKED!</p>
<p>My point is that the importance given to sexuality in our society has never been logical so why do you expect this instance to be any different?</p>
<p>Also, have you noticed in all this talk about rubbing up against people it is virtually always about male sexuality.  I am pretty certain that just as much &#8216;rubbing&#8217; goes on in the lesbian community.</p>
<p>Lastly, I&#8217;m not implying that homosexuals are more likely to engage in rape.  I&#8217;m implying that they are just as likely.  We need to get past stereotypes and acknowledge people are people&#8230;with all the psycho-sexual illogic that entails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikenavarro</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8025</link>
		<dc:creator>mikenavarro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8025</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Eugene, for that classic example of the Straw Man Argument. Please observe that my comment says nothing, nor implies anything, about Democrats, or their modern-day practice of politics.

But since you fallaciously bring the subject up, I completely agree with the notion that modern day Democrats are merely part of the fascist whole. As a matter of fact, I&#039;ve been writing, quite a bit, about that very subject here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://mk.users.sonic.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mk.users.sonic.net/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Eugene, for that classic example of the Straw Man Argument. Please observe that my comment says nothing, nor implies anything, about Democrats, or their modern-day practice of politics.</p>
<p>But since you fallaciously bring the subject up, I completely agree with the notion that modern day Democrats are merely part of the fascist whole. As a matter of fact, I&#8217;ve been writing, quite a bit, about that very subject here: <a href="http://mk.users.sonic.net/" rel="nofollow">http://mk.users.sonic.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinkblue</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8022</link>
		<dc:creator>thinkblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8022</guid>
		<description>Your argument is bizarre. Since straight men rape straight women, gay men could rape straight men. The problem with the logic is it doesn&#039;t identify the straight males as the dominant demographic, which they are in both cases. Straight men don&#039;t fear reprisal from their subordinate women, while the same couldn&#039;t be said about gay men and their straight, male victims.

It&#039;s interesting how the entire military establishment hasn&#039;t come crashing down when hundreds of women have been raped by fellow servicemembers, but the possibility of one dude &quot;rubbing up against another&quot; is enough to justify segregating the service and making America less safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is bizarre. Since straight men rape straight women, gay men could rape straight men. The problem with the logic is it doesn&#8217;t identify the straight males as the dominant demographic, which they are in both cases. Straight men don&#8217;t fear reprisal from their subordinate women, while the same couldn&#8217;t be said about gay men and their straight, male victims.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting how the entire military establishment hasn&#8217;t come crashing down when hundreds of women have been raped by fellow servicemembers, but the possibility of one dude &#8220;rubbing up against another&#8221; is enough to justify segregating the service and making America less safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">Eugene Capocasale</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8019</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">Eugene Capocasale</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8019</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dancing with Smurfs&quot; was a pretty accurate parody of Glenn Beck.

    However, “Trickle Down! Step right up and get your Trickle Down Economics!” is an invalid argument.  The Democratic solution is also trickle down economics: give the big banks more bailouts, and the money will trickle down to the little guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dancing with Smurfs&#8221; was a pretty accurate parody of Glenn Beck.</p>
<p>    However, “Trickle Down! Step right up and get your Trickle Down Economics!” is an invalid argument.  The Democratic solution is also trickle down economics: give the big banks more bailouts, and the money will trickle down to the little guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dharmabum81</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/10/rush-on-massa/comment-page-1/#comment-8018</link>
		<dc:creator>dharmabum81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=1400#comment-8018</guid>
		<description>Lynne...I obviously can&#039;t tell if you&#039;re joking or not but if you aren&#039;t, you might want to re-read his articles. Apparently you&#039;ve completely missed the point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynne&#8230;I obviously can&#8217;t tell if you&#8217;re joking or not but if you aren&#8217;t, you might want to re-read his articles. Apparently you&#8217;ve completely missed the point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

