<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Obama listen to ex-Fed chief Paul Volcker&#8217;s warnings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/</link>
	<description>[Please go to &#039;Settings&#039; to change your Tagline]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:26:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Volcker on Risk and Commercial Banks</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-10777</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Volcker on Risk and Commercial Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-10777</guid>
		<description>[...] Taibbi: Will Obama Listen to Volcker&#8217;s Warnings? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taibbi: Will Obama Listen to Volcker&#8217;s Warnings? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: can america be salvaged? &#171; celluloid blonde</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>can america be salvaged? &#171; celluloid blonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>[...] told the voice of America&#8217;s youth to be drummed out of Washington, distance himself from the progressive economic advisers who strategized his election win, sell out to Big Pharma, extend the Patriot Act, celebrate a big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] told the voice of America&#8217;s youth to be drummed out of Washington, distance himself from the progressive economic advisers who strategized his election win, sell out to Big Pharma, extend the Patriot Act, celebrate a big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitchmidwife</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>bitchmidwife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>I am so disgusted by this kind of crap going on since the election - also the complete dropping the ball on prosecuting the Bushies for their unconstitutional deeds, the wholesale throwing women&#039;s rights under the bus with health care reform, the abandoment of a public health insurance option that I could buy into, the utter spinelessness and capitulation of the Democrats and the administration to the Republicans, so on and so on ... so far I am planning on sitting out the elections in 2010 and 2012. Change? What change. There was a massive bait and switch. Obama wanted to be as great a president as FDR? If he continues on this path, he will never come close to FDR or Johnston. He lacks the courage of his convictions and he and his administration are collectively fellating the insurance industry, big pharma, military contractors, Blackwater, AIG, Wall Street, the religious right, you name it ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so disgusted by this kind of crap going on since the election &#8211; also the complete dropping the ball on prosecuting the Bushies for their unconstitutional deeds, the wholesale throwing women&#8217;s rights under the bus with health care reform, the abandoment of a public health insurance option that I could buy into, the utter spinelessness and capitulation of the Democrats and the administration to the Republicans, so on and so on &#8230; so far I am planning on sitting out the elections in 2010 and 2012. Change? What change. There was a massive bait and switch. Obama wanted to be as great a president as FDR? If he continues on this path, he will never come close to FDR or Johnston. He lacks the courage of his convictions and he and his administration are collectively fellating the insurance industry, big pharma, military contractors, Blackwater, AIG, Wall Street, the religious right, you name it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expat</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator>expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>marie, I definitely do not disagree about their pushing forward on a host of lobbied-for corporate fronts - though they also do some good things in that regard (see the missile shield cancellation).  Still, their whole purpose these days seems to be not rocking the consensus boat too much.  Increase enforcement a bit, re-staff the GOP-gutted permanent bureaucracy and keep their lobbyists happy.  Most of all, make sure not to take any irreversible actions in a progressive direction, like, say, granting an entitlement or empowering real regulatory enforcement so that they leave a government in place that&#039;s easy for the GOP to completely stifle once they get back in the captain&#039;s chair.  

Of course as lackluster or corporate or wrong-headed as the Democrats can be, there&#039;s simply no equivalent to staffing the permanent bureaucracy with a bunch of Liberty University and Bob Jones grads and telling them to gut their agency, throw out anyone who reports on science that angers religious supporters, stifle anyone who might interfere with industry and fire any attorneys that aren&#039;t actively prosecuting Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marie, I definitely do not disagree about their pushing forward on a host of lobbied-for corporate fronts &#8211; though they also do some good things in that regard (see the missile shield cancellation).  Still, their whole purpose these days seems to be not rocking the consensus boat too much.  Increase enforcement a bit, re-staff the GOP-gutted permanent bureaucracy and keep their lobbyists happy.  Most of all, make sure not to take any irreversible actions in a progressive direction, like, say, granting an entitlement or empowering real regulatory enforcement so that they leave a government in place that&#8217;s easy for the GOP to completely stifle once they get back in the captain&#8217;s chair.  </p>
<p>Of course as lackluster or corporate or wrong-headed as the Democrats can be, there&#8217;s simply no equivalent to staffing the permanent bureaucracy with a bunch of Liberty University and Bob Jones grads and telling them to gut their agency, throw out anyone who reports on science that angers religious supporters, stifle anyone who might interfere with industry and fire any attorneys that aren&#8217;t actively prosecuting Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marie</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator>marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2732</guid>
		<description>expat - When a pattern becomes clear through repetition, recognizing it is far beyond a &quot;feeling.&quot;  Like you, I still don&#039;t know if the Democrats that are approved as being electable to POTUS are in on the game before the general election or if they only receive their orders after they win.  

However, far from being mere interim caretakers, they are expected to advance the corporate interests and accomplish what eluded their immediate GOP predecessor.  It was Clinton that got two of GHB&#039;s agenda items through: NAFTA and reduction in the capital gains taxes.  And he didn&#039;t stop there -- pushed through more deregulation than Reagan and Bush combined managed.

Meanwhile, rank and file Democrats are kept distracted by the rightwing corporate rabble-rousers and their Pavlovian loons.  Of course in falling for these distractions every time, the left is no less Pavlovian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>expat &#8211; When a pattern becomes clear through repetition, recognizing it is far beyond a &#8220;feeling.&#8221;  Like you, I still don&#8217;t know if the Democrats that are approved as being electable to POTUS are in on the game before the general election or if they only receive their orders after they win.  </p>
<p>However, far from being mere interim caretakers, they are expected to advance the corporate interests and accomplish what eluded their immediate GOP predecessor.  It was Clinton that got two of GHB&#8217;s agenda items through: NAFTA and reduction in the capital gains taxes.  And he didn&#8217;t stop there &#8212; pushed through more deregulation than Reagan and Bush combined managed.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, rank and file Democrats are kept distracted by the rightwing corporate rabble-rousers and their Pavlovian loons.  Of course in falling for these distractions every time, the left is no less Pavlovian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Obama News Thread - Page 101 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2731</link>
		<dc:creator>President Obama News Thread - Page 101 - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2731</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlebrother</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2728</link>
		<dc:creator>littlebrother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2728</guid>
		<description>Matt, you seem to be keeping pretty busy, but that &quot;larger story&quot; to which you allude needs to be published sooner than later.

Here&#039;s a headline suggestion:  &quot;The Scurrilousness of a Thousand Cuts&quot;.

Don&#039;t forget the DOJ, which apart from some minor relief and judicially-imposed reform has consistently defended and promoted the refried Third Reich jurisprudence and turbocharged Unitary Executive concept implemented by their nefarious predecessor.

I mean, gee whiz-- if Obama &amp; Holder&#039;s Department of Justice wasn&#039;t so fanatically determined to stay clean as Bo&#039;s tooth, and avoid even the appearance of the sordid and malfeasant politicization practiced by the previous maladministration, one might wonder if the DOJ also &quot;jettisoned&quot; promising selections.

It Dawns on me that it has indeed.

Please have yourself cloned to connect these dots as comprehensively as you do with the banksters!  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, you seem to be keeping pretty busy, but that &#8220;larger story&#8221; to which you allude needs to be published sooner than later.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a headline suggestion:  &#8220;The Scurrilousness of a Thousand Cuts&#8221;.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget the DOJ, which apart from some minor relief and judicially-imposed reform has consistently defended and promoted the refried Third Reich jurisprudence and turbocharged Unitary Executive concept implemented by their nefarious predecessor.</p>
<p>I mean, gee whiz&#8211; if Obama &amp; Holder&#8217;s Department of Justice wasn&#8217;t so fanatically determined to stay clean as Bo&#8217;s tooth, and avoid even the appearance of the sordid and malfeasant politicization practiced by the previous maladministration, one might wonder if the DOJ also &#8220;jettisoned&#8221; promising selections.</p>
<p>It Dawns on me that it has indeed.</p>
<p>Please have yourself cloned to connect these dots as comprehensively as you do with the banksters!  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Volcker, Still MIA &#171; Rortybomb</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Volcker, Still MIA &#171; Rortybomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>[...] want to point out something Matt Taibbi just wrote about the fact that Paul Volcker is still isolated from the Obama economics team (my underline): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] want to point out something Matt Taibbi just wrote about the fact that Paul Volcker is still isolated from the Obama economics team (my underline): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Obama listen to ex-Fed chief Paul Volcker’s warnings? &#171; In These New Times</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Obama listen to ex-Fed chief Paul Volcker’s warnings? &#171; In These New Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by smeddum on September 17, 2009  Sep. 17 2009 — Will Obama listen to ex-Fed chief Paul Volcker’s warnings? trueslant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by smeddum on September 17, 2009  Sep. 17 2009 — Will Obama listen to ex-Fed chief Paul Volcker’s warnings? trueslant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharkdb</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2009/09/17/volcker-renews-call-for-limits-on-systemically-important-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>sharkdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/?p=789#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>Volcker&#039;s warnings are more than merely obvious even for the mildly informed.  I believe this issue in the current White House (or in any other for that matter) to be less ideological and more rooted in blatant self-serving corruption.  Sorry to say Goldman Sachs has weathered this PR storm nicely as they watch their stock price race toward 200 while they find more ways to steal from those who do real productive work.  Their P/S (stealings) ratio is over 40, but investors know there is no stopping this juggernaut with all their operatives working their interests from the inside the government. They will get their huge stolen bonuses this year and will complain about having to make their way around aimless unemployed people on their way to their new yacht.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volcker&#8217;s warnings are more than merely obvious even for the mildly informed.  I believe this issue in the current White House (or in any other for that matter) to be less ideological and more rooted in blatant self-serving corruption.  Sorry to say Goldman Sachs has weathered this PR storm nicely as they watch their stock price race toward 200 while they find more ways to steal from those who do real productive work.  Their P/S (stealings) ratio is over 40, but investors know there is no stopping this juggernaut with all their operatives working their interests from the inside the government. They will get their huge stolen bonuses this year and will complain about having to make their way around aimless unemployed people on their way to their new yacht.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

