What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

May. 10 2010 - 4:17 pm | 507 views | 0 recommendations | 4 comments

Kagan could alienate purple-state Dems

Harvard law school dean Elena Kagan

Image via Wikipedia

The Obama administration expects Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court to sail through the Senate. She’s a legal trailblazer, she’s been approved by the Senate already, and she enjoys the support of and has encouraged conservative legal scholars.

Most mainstream media outlets and liberal commentators have reached a similar conclusion. Yes, Kagan’s decision as dean of Harvard Law School to prevent the military from using the law school’s career center because of its position on excluding openly gay troops will cause a dust-up in the Senate; and yes, her sexual orientation has been questioned. But come on, military recruiters were not totally banned from Harvard Law; and in 2010, an openly gay person should be allowed to serve on the highest court in the land.

Whatever you think about the morality of military recruitment on campus and a person’s sexual orientation, thinking that Kagan’s nomination is unlikely to encounter major hurdles surely owes more to liberal-elite naivete than a fair-minded reading of the tea leaves. To assume her bid will enjoy smooth ride is to ignore the last four-plus decades of political and journalistic history.

Kagan’s problem with blocking the military recruiters from campus is likely to be one of perception. In truth, she allowed military recruiters access to Harvard Law School students through the school’s veterans group; and her limited ban was in place for all of one semester. But don’t expect Republicans, conservative activists, and military organizations to make those distinctions. To them, Kagan did more than fail to include the military on campus; she actively excluded it, booting its members from Harvard Yard.

Treating members of the military as the equivalent of John Birchers or Scientologists will not play well. Many veterans, still smarting from the disdain they received during the Vietnam era, have long memories. At a gun show in Des Moines, I saw a bumper sticker on the back of a car or truck that read, “I’ll forgive Jane Fonda when the Jews forgive Hitler.”

Kagan would have a political problem about her sexual orientation if the press discovers that she is in fact gay. The White House already has implied that she’s straight; technically, it issued a non-denial denial on the subject, but issuing one of those was not exactly helpful to the Nixon or Clinton administrations. But suppose the National Enquirer, the Pulitzer-nominated Enquirer mind you, does to Kagan what it did to John Edwards. If they discover that Kagan is gay, she and the administration come across as phonies.

The worst-case scenario for Democrats is that Kagan is perceived as a cross between Hanoi Jane and John Edwards. As Peter Beinart wrote, banning the military from elite campuses has only helped generations of Nixons, Atwaters, and Roves beat Democrats at the polls. And having your credibility undermined has hurt members of both parties, whether it’s been Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, or George W. Bush.

Even if the worst-case scenario materializes, Kagan is likely to win confirmation. Her legal record is too thin to antagonize as many constituencies as Robert Bork did in 1987, and nominees have learned from his mistake that senators care far more about how your opinions play back home than whether they are just and true. But if it does materialize, don’t look for many Democratic senators from purple- and-red states voting for her.

Back to you Senators Nelson of Nebraska, Lincoln and Pryor from Arkansas, Landrieu of Louisiana, Nelson of Florida, and Hagan of North Carolina.


4 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    Don’t worry she is a hardcore radical leftist..if she were older, we would call her Hanoi Elena

  2. collapse expand

    So the great street wise progressive Messiah, that was appointed by the DNC and
    sold to us as the anti ‘W’ is nothing more than a Reagan wannabe and a poor one at that

    A man willing to sell his country down the river under the guise this will help him
    and the party win the blue and ‘gag’ purple states this midterm.

    What next, bailing out Europe while this country’s middle class drowns under the weight of his Friedman thinking financial policies and lack of banking/foreclosure/bankruptcy reform?

    As if.


  3. collapse expand

    “Treating members of the military as the equivalent of John Birchers or Scientologists will not play well. ”

    What if they’re card-carrying Oath Keepers? Or members of the Evangelical Air Force? Did no one read “Jesus killed Muhammed”?

    But I guess if Lindsey Graham and the rest of the committee can’t recognize a teammate from an opposition player we deserve whatever we get.

    “The worst-case scenario for Democrats is that Kagan is perceived as a cross between Hanoi Jane and John Edwards.”
    (now that’s some killer copy) I think the suggestion of that perception is enough to give it legs, precisely because of the ridiculous nature of the proposed scenario.

    I guess you missed her solicitor general confirmation hearings. I could have sworn she was just about say Dick was right about the whole VP/barnicle thing but thought to herself, “No, no…that’s laying it on too thick.”

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    Mark Stricherz is the author of Why the Democrats are Blue: Secular Liberalism and the Decline of the People's Party (Encounter Books, 2007). He was born in San Francisco in 1970 and raised in the Bay Area. He graduated from Santa Clara University and the University of Chicago (M.A. in Social Sciences, '97). In between, he worked, as part of the Jesuit Volunteer Corps, for an inner-city housing agency in Baton Rouge, La. His work has appeared in The New York Times, the Washington Post, The Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, The New Republic, and The Weekly Standard, among other publications. He, his wife, and two daughters live in the Washington, D.C. region.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 41
    Contributor Since: February 2009

    What I'm Up To

    My Book

    cover“Sadly, it’s all true.”
    Melinda Henneberger, editor of Politics Daily

    “A (true) account”
    Rick Perlstein, author of Nixonland

    “Masterful …”
    Brett Decker, editorial page editor, Washington Times

    “How … the parties switched places on cultural issues … still seems a puzzle, and, in his new book … Stricherz has provided a crucial piece for solving that puzzle.”
    Ramesh Ponnuru, senior editor for National Review