What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Jun. 4 2009 - 5:54 pm | 6 views | 0 recommendations | 1 comment

Sotomayor’s remarks weren’t racist

curley1

The American Catholic takes Judge Sotomayor for task for her various “wise” comments:

Imagine a white male conservative making the same comments that Judge Sonia Sotomayor made:

A wise White man with his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina female,”

The mainstream media (old media) would have a field day recounting how racist Republicans are.  It would be nonstop media coverage not seen since Trent Lott’s infamous statements.

Well, sure the media would have, but that’s not the point. Sotomayor’s comments were not racist, the pronouncements of conservatives notwithstanding ; she has made no statement that simply by virtue of their makeup and composition, Latinos, women, or working class people are superior to their opposites. Rather, her comments were an expression of ethnic, gender, and class pride. She said that given their background and experiences, Latinos, women, and working-class folk are more likely to come to the correct conclusion. It’s the difference between the worldview of David Duke and James Michael Curley.

Sotomayor’s pride in her background is understandable. She overcame poverty as well as racial and gender bias. Those accomplishments might sound trite, but stop to consider your own background and heritage. Were your forebears not in a similar position to that of the young Sotomayor? When I think of her life story, I think of that of my Irish grandfather. He grew up as one of 14 children on a farm in western Ireland, the poorest part of the country at the time, in the early 20th century. He immigrated to America in 1922 and landed in Boston. Disgusted by the “no-Irish need apply” signs in the city’s stores, he moved to San Francisco. There he found steady work as a city bus driver and night watchman at the city’s harbor. If he considered his judgment superior to that of a upper-class Protestant who never struggled, I could not blame him. His judgment, borne of adversity, would have given him a deeper insight into human nature.

Then again, my grandfather would not have been qualified to serve as a judge, let alone a Supreme Court Justice. That leap of logic is the problem with Sotomayor’s comment; it’s also partly why the Obama administration forced her to retract the remark. But as far as I am concerned, most white Catholics need a refresher course on their heritage and history, a reminder that putatively racist remarks can be something benign.


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Mark Stricherz is the author of Why the Democrats are Blue: Secular Liberalism and the Decline of the People's Party (Encounter Books, 2007). He was born in San Francisco in 1970 and raised in the Bay Area. He graduated from Santa Clara University and the University of Chicago (M.A. in Social Sciences, '97). In between, he worked, as part of the Jesuit Volunteer Corps, for an inner-city housing agency in Baton Rouge, La. His work has appeared in The New York Times, the Washington Post, The Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, The New Republic, and The Weekly Standard, among other publications. He, his wife, and two daughters live in the Washington, D.C. region.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 41
    Contributor Since: February 2009

    What I'm Up To

    My Book

    cover“Sadly, it’s all true.”
    Melinda Henneberger, editor of Politics Daily

    “A (true) account”
    Rick Perlstein, author of Nixonland

    “Masterful …”
    Brett Decker, editorial page editor, Washington Times

    “How … the parties switched places on cultural issues … still seems a puzzle, and, in his new book … Stricherz has provided a crucial piece for solving that puzzle.”
    Ramesh Ponnuru, senior editor for National Review

    BUY THE BOOK