What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Feb. 4 2010 - 10:45 am | 121 views | 1 recommendation | 5 comments

Iran says Brazil may enrich its uranium

Iran has cited Brazil as one country where they may outsource uranium to be enriched, so as to show the international community they’re not planning military uses for the nuclear material, according to Brazilian media. The Estado de São Paulo newspaper cited Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of Iran’s atomic energy agency, as saying the uranium might be shipped to an Asian country, possibly Japan, or perhaps France or Brazil. According to Estado, the Iranian plan is in response to an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) proposal. The IAEA is working with the international community in trying to set out limits for Iran’s nuclear program, to ensure it is developed exclusively for peaceful purposes.

According to Estado, Salehi said Iran was “negotiating” with all these countries for handling its uranium enrichment.

But Brazilian officials denied they were in such talks with Iran. Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim was quoted in Estado: “At no point in the Brazilian government’s conversations with Iran was the possibility of enriching Iranian minerals in our country discussed.”

Brazil has recently tried to position itself as a go-between as Iran and the West try to sort out their differences. The visit of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Brazil last year was criticized by the United States and other countries. But Brazil has also worked hard to build relations with Israel. Last month, Brazil’s Defense Minister Nelson Jobim visited Israel and met with military and intelligence officials. He also negotiated deals to acquire Israeli-made drone aircraft.


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 5 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    I think this is the problem with the ‘confidence building’ approach to dealing with Iran’s nuclear program. Iran does not have confidence in the international community, and vice versa. So instead of having a frank discussion about Iran’s over all nuclear efforts, the world debates the ultimately rather minor detail about who enriches Iran’s nuclear fuel, Brazil/Japan/etc. or Russia/France. They’ve been jawboning this particular issue now for about six months, and it seems like if you’re not going to go big, you should go home.

    • collapse expand

      It is a good point to raise– how forceful these attempts at confidence building are– but on the other hand “going home” seems a poor alternative right now to some of the others being floated, however unlikely they are, such as dropping bombs on Iran. According to the Brazilian article I linked to in my post, Iran’s nod to foreign enrichment was something of a breakthrough. Is that not right? It’s interesting to me because of Iran’s increasingly high profile in Latin America.

      In response to another comment. See in context »
      • collapse expand

        I agree that ‘going home’ isn’t a great option, I’m just saying that unless the world goes big, it’s unlikely that they’ll reach any kind of deal.

        And I’d say that it’s hard to call the willingness to ship the uranium to Brazil a breakthrough, because Iran is doing an old diplomatic trick of the insincere concession – we’ll do what you want us to do, but only on our terms.

        A classic example in recent years was John Bolton at the UN saying that he was in favor of the Security Council adding Japan as a member, but the US was opposed to pretty much every other element of the proposed Security Council reforms. You can no longer state “The US is opposed to Security Council expansion,” but the US is only in favor of a form of Security Council expansion that everyone else in the world finds disagreeable. Same thing with Iran. They’re trying to inject more countries into the nuclear talks who aren’t already involved to further complicate the discussions in their favor. Basically, bring countries into the discussion that are aspiring hegemons and with whom they have more pacific relations because dealing with UK, Germany, France, America, Russia, and China is more difficult.

        In response to another comment. See in context »
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Readers, thanks for your eyeball time, please send tips, corrections, complaints, rants, etc. My email is ballve [at] gmail.com. I was born in Buenos Aires and raised there and in Atlanta, Mexico City and Caracas. I've written and reported on Latin America for almost a dozen years. I started out as an Associated Press reporter and editor in the agency’s Brazil and Caribbean bureaus. In 2007 I co-founded El Sol de San Telmo, a community newspaper in Buenos Aires. I am now a contributing editor for the nonprofit New America Media, Americas correspondent for Amsterdam-based Research World magazine (publication of the international association of market and public opinion researchers), and a 2010-2011 Lemann Fellow at the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA).

    See my profile »
    Followers: 43
    Contributor Since: June 2009
    Location:Brooklyn

    What I'm Up To

    • For longer pieces, and a portfolio of published work please see my web page.

      webpagecapture

       
    • nam

      Since 2002 I have been a contributing editor at New America Media, where I write about Latin America and the politics of immigration in the United States.

       
    • 1248375172-waxpoetics__issue36ju_101b

      Wax Poetics issue #36, with my essay on Brazilian singer-songwriter Jards Macalé.

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    • +O
    >.