Sandra Bullock blindsided? Team Sandy!
What is it about Sandra Bullock that has brought her to this pass?
Is it the Oscar Curse?
Is it the Law of Conservation of Catastrophe?
Has her cruel, ice-cold lover Meryl Streep decided to throw this poor fish back into the cold, uncaring ocean?
For those of you who tuned into this soap opera late:
- Sandra Bullock, recent Oscar winner and America’s Sweetheart, has bailed on her London premiere and left the marital domicile
- because an InTouch cover story has broken the allegation that her husband had an affair with a tattoo model while Sandy was out earning said Oscar on location. Unless, like, that’s just a coincidence and it’s because she’s having a bad hair day, but when has that ever stopped her?
Is it the old cliche about if he’ll cheat with you, he’ll cheat on you?
Is it Facebook’s fault?
Is it that she married a guy who looked like, and in fact actually was (irony swallows its own tail), someone you couldn’t take home to Mother no matter how much he tried to convince you otherwise?
Do the Razzie people have that much power?
Is it that God Hates Sandra Bullock?
Is it that God Hates cougars?
Is it that God just hates women?
Because the truth is (no matter how they feel about Raymond) everybody loves Sandy.
Except maybe (apparently) God.
And that tawdry tat model that her husband is/was (allegedly) schtupping.
May I be the first to use this?
Team Sandy!™
Thank you. This concludes the free verse section of today’s sermon.
Bonus section: How to have a marriage like Sandra Bullock and Jesse James: an instructional video.
The secret? Passion. The downfall? Not being terribly specific.
Marcia, Sandra Bullock on line one.
Post Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment
T/S Members
Log in with your True/Slant account.
Lolebrity
Hey, Lorraine. As I just posted on my site, maybe Sandy’s hubby wasn’t feeling appreciated. In talking to men about what they want from their wives & partners – appreciation was #1.
Yes, that doesn’t surprise me. When they surveyed convicted embezzlers, the #1 reason they gave for the initial decision to skim funds was, yes, that they felt unappreciated and disrespected.
In response to another comment. See in context »Sandra Bullock is a home wrecker who got what she had coming! How dare she think the man who left his pregnant wife for her wouldn’t do the same thing to her?? He left his second wife Janine while 8 months pregnant, denied the child was his until DNA proved differently, and then abandoned his daughter for the first three years of her life. The only reason why he resurfaced is because Sandra can’t have children and wanted a new toy.
Sandra is nothing more than a babysitter but has the nerve to do interviews claiming all his children are also her children. Her head would spin like the demon possessed if another woman called her children their children! She has no children!!
Janine was happy that Jesse came back into her daughter’s life. She started making baby books for him because he did miss out on her daughter’s life for three years. He and Sandra then sued for sole custody. COINCIDENCE that at the same time, the IRS was tipped off about Janine not paying taxes and there she went to prison and is now in a half way house. Janine was asked by Howard Stern who turned her in to the IRS. She said one of her exes but wouldn’t name him.
Janine wants Sandra involved in Sunny’s life. But Sandra wants nothing to do with Janine, the MOTHER. Janine said Sandra has refused to sit down and talk to her. They have never talked! How can you not talk to the mother of the child you’re about to babysit for all those months while she’s away in prison? Janine never did anything to Sandra! Sandra is consumed with everything Janine. Sandra went after Janine’s husband and now after her daughter.
The reason why Sandra didn’t kick Jesse out of her home is because if she does, Janine’s daughter goes to. What will Sandra do now? Sue for custody of a child she was babysitting??? Sandra has no legal claim to Janine’s daughter. So Sandra moved out of the house instead. She’ll probably never leave Jesse because she can’t have children and will do everything possible to not let go of Janine’s daughter.
Jesse doesn’t want Janine’s daughter around a porn star but he didn’t see a problem in marrying a porn star and getting that porn star pregnant. Now he cheats on Sandra with a woman who has even more tattoos than Janine does. He has a type and it certainly is not Sandra. He only married her because it raised his image in Hollywood. Sandra thumbs her nose down at Janine for being a porn star. But what Janine did in front of a camera since she was 18 is what Sandra does behind closed motel room doors all these years throughout the casting couches of Hollywood!
Aha! Someone who doesn’t love America’s Sweetheart!
I don’t know about the casting couch allegation (wouldn’t she have been in better movies if that were true?) but the child angle is interesting.
Given her speech at the Oscars, where she teared up thanking mothers of adopted children, do you think that being in The Blind Side might have opened her eyes to the possibility of adopting on her own? I’m not talking Mia Farrow/Angelina Jolie scenario, but one child possibly.
In response to another comment. See in context »[...] What caused the Sandra Bullock drama? – TS [...]
[...] Team Sandy! Sandra Bullock blindsided by Fate? (True/Slant) [...]
[...] time to admit I was wrong: God doesn’t hate Sandra Bullock; God hates Jesse James. Well, these days who doesn’t? The proof is [...]
[...] Go Team Sandy (Bullock) TrueSlant [...]
She should adopt or take in foster children. So many need homes. They wouldn’t be her children either but she could lay claim to them as her children instead of children who already have a mother.
She pissed off a lot of mothers a while back saying you don’t have to be breeders to raise a child. So biological mothers said are we animals or dogs? It’s Sandra trying to insult and distance herself from biological mothers as much as she can so to make herself feel better about the decision she made taking a little girl away from her mother and brother.
Well, she didn’t really take the little girl away from her mother, did she now? The American government did, when they put the mother in prison.
I completely agree that she should look at taking in a child who’s currently in foster care. In fact, I’m stewing on a post about the entire issue; look at her Oscar speech, which powerfully made the point that there are children out there who need loving parents to take them in. Sandy was a little mother-heavy, as opposed to equal-opportunity-parenting, but as a mother herself, I guess that’s understandable.
Let’s not get into the Breeder Is Better/Worse argument; that’s just a way of distracting ourselves with internecine squabbling when the bigger question is how to children well. In this case, it would be Sandra or it would be a foster home, from which you’ve already (rightly) suggested she adopt.
In response to another comment. See in context »[...] case any misty-eyed fans out there were still hoping for a touching reconciliation between Sandra Bullock, America’s Sweetheart and her tattoo-model-schtupping old man, allow me to destroy your dreams. It’s [...]