What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

May. 18 2010 - 4:07 pm | 364 views | 1 recommendation | 2 comments

What’s in a name? Forget Socialism with a capital S

A stylized representation of a red flag, usefu...

Image via Wikipedia

Labels: we love them, we hate them. Ultimately we can’t seem to get away from them.

I was having a conversation with a new acquaintance yesterday. When he learned that I am from Sweden, he asked me what I thought about bringing “socialism” to America. He referred to how left-leaning newspapers cite Sweden as a positive example of how “socialism” works in practice, adding that he thought this was a moronic thing to do since what works in Sweden, an arguably much more homogenous country of a mere nine million people, will never work in such a vast and diverse country as America.

I thought about this for a moment. What seemed to give this new acquaintance such ammunition was the label: socialism. As though there is one way in which socialism can and does work in the world. I gently pointed out that though Sweden is a social welfare state, our political system is one that mixes a strong public sector with market economic principles (hence the famed Swedish “Third Way”). In fact, our current government is a right-wing coalition (Granted, right wing in Sweden is very different from right wing in America. But still, the Social Democratic Party is not in power at the moment.).

My point was that things are rarely as simple as pundits or their labels make them seem. Sweden’s political system cannot be accurately defined as the perfect embodiment of Socialism with a capital S. And I don’t think anyone, not even the most left leaning of American politicos, is advocating for a total adoption of another country’s political or social model just because they reference them in newspaper articles. As is usually the case with shaky assertions, they’re just too simplistic. No, America will never become a Socialist State (whatever that means). But perhaps America would benefit from adopting certain aspects of policies or attitudes prevalent in other countries.

I happened to be holding a two-month old baby in my arms at the time of this exchange (the sleeping babe of my boss who is about to return from a miserably short maternity leave) and so I thought parental leave was an appropriate place to start. I mentioned to my conversation partner that America offers the most bare bones parental leave policies of any industrialized nation (the Families and Medical Leave Act guarantees Americans who work at companies with fifty or more employees 12 weeks of unpaid leave), while Sweden offers some of the most generous (18 months of paid parental leave, split between the two parents as they see fit). I then mentioned that from my experience, Americans assume that they will be penalized, especially fathers, for taking any time off when they have a baby. As one ambitious twenty-something man once told me, he would love to take paternity leave if it was offered but: “I just know that none of the guys that I have worked with have done it and I wonder what the back room chatter would be if I chose to do that.” And he’s right. The majority of large employers in the US consider it inappropriate for men to take any kind of parental leave. When my colleague Liz and I spoke to Swedes, on the other hand, we found quite a different attitude. Men expected to take advantage of the paternity leave they knew was available to them. One management consultant told us his boss, a man, was on paternity leave and had been for several months. When we asked if that was frowned upon, the consultant looked surprised, like he didn’t understand our question.

The multi-national companies that operate on American and European soil adapt their company policies to the policies prevailing in each country. For instance, European workers will get their five weeks of vacation, because it’s the law, while their American counterparts within the same corporation won’t necessarily enjoy the same privilege because America doesn’t have a similar vacation law. The same applies to parental leave. When in Rome, right? Does that mean Major Corporation X’s American office is a lot more efficient than its Swedish one? I doubt it. If giving workers vacation and parental leave messed up a company as much as American attitudes seem to suggest, it’s likely that Major Corporation X wouldn’t invest in having an office in a country with such policies in the first place. And yet they do.

So, no. I don’t think Socialism with a big S will ever be a reality in America. But I do think it is possible to change prevailing attitudes about specific issues, like how much parental leave people should get, what a reasonable amount of vacation is, and who has the right to health care.

Forget the labels. But remember that norms change— and so can policy.

- Astri


ps. Here’s The Daily Show having some fun with the whole Swedish Socialist Scare of recent months, and here is part 2.


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Well thank you for this.

    Here in America we have no idea what socialism really means and equate it with communism and Nazis. We are a fairly ignorant nation and think fascism and communism are interchangeable which would surprise the Spanish who fought a bitter war over the differences.

    WE believe only America has democratic free enterprise system and we will be still be praising our corrupt system in the rubble of our failed institutions.

    Socialism is defined by a government that controls the means of production. Not many countries have that control except maybe China and oddly they are doing quite well thank you.

    So forgive our arrogance we mean well but we’re all under a bit of stress keeping our heads above water in the world’s greatest democracy.

  2. collapse expand

    Incredibly good article. I am 53 years old and doing everything I can to retire early. If I had better vacation I would probably work longer. This is a serious demographic issue. Our nation needs to encourage people to work longer. It was just dumb luck that when our son was born 19 years ago, it was is a town with a lot of older folks available to take on contract babysitting. These things should not be left to luck.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

About

We’re two twenty-somethings who joined the real world armed with diplomas worth a combined half million dollars from Middlebury College—only to find out that we didn’t have a clue. No one prepared us for the inflexibility of the whole workplace set-up. No one warned us that the Mommies were at War, or that employers still assumed men were okay seeing their kids every other week, or that the U.S. doesn’t guarantee paid parental leave, vacation, or sick leave. The current work-life model isn’t working. Let’s talk about it.

In 2007, we started a non-profit called The Lattice Group, which aims to bring awareness about work-life issues to young people, so if you can’t get enough of our musings on True/Slant check out http://thelatticegroup.org.

See our profile »

Our Contributors

Liz KofmanLiz Kofman
Followers: 65
Contributor Since: June 2009

Our T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    What We're Up To

    Follow Us On Twitter

    @thelatticegroup: Dish on work-life news, policies, and peeps.

    latticegrouplogo