What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Oct. 20 2009 - 3:08 am | 1,086 views | 0 recommendations | 6 comments

Mad Men needs fixing and I know how

Mad Men

Draper. Don Draper. (Image via Wikipedia)

Mad Men’s makers may not know it requires rescuing but it does. It’s gone from fascinating to a little on the dull side this season.

Things have settled into a predictable pattern. Don Draper will keep having extramarital affairs and Betty Draper will keep getting bored with her boring life and resentful over Don’s secrecy and his insistence that needs to be at the office all night when in fact he’s six houses away banging the schoolmarm or whoever it is next time.

At the office, the mad boys and girl will keep sweating to come up with bright ideas for selling Maidenform bras or Hilton hotels, hoping to win a flicker of approval from Don.

Yawn.

The atmospherics of Mad Men are terrific, of course, and the writing often high level, so we need to find a way to revitalize the show.

I have. What Mad Men needs is violence.

Brutal, raw, unrelenting violence. That’ll give it the zing it’s slowly losing.

The Law and Order franchise keeps going forever because people get killed and molested. Hospital shows gush blood amid the romance and lawyer shows do murder, guilt and innocence and all that jazz.

Violence provides not only your visceral thrills but suspense. Will Melvin get killed or will he not? And if so, when? How? By whom?

You can have a good movie without violence because it lasts only 90 minutes and it has an ending. Endings are satisfying. Things get resolved. Catharsis occurs. A TV series just goes on and on and the characters just keep doing the same things. After you know their personalities well, there’s little surprise. Things run down.

Unless there’s blood and advertising isn’t bloody. Once in a while, you can lop off someone’s foot in freak lawn-mower accident but it’s not enough.

So next season Mad Men should take a drastic turn. Sterling Cooper should no longer be an ad agency but a spy agency posing as an ad agency.

I suppose it’ll be a bit of a jolt for the viewer at first but hey, it’s not like these were ever real people. It’s fiction. We’ll swallow anything if it’s done well. Besides, these are desperate times.

So the agency is now an outfit like UNCLE or SMERSH or KAOS. Everyone in the office is armed to the teeth and expert in martial arts, leading to many gunfights, car chases and karate fights with lots of furniture flying around. Bombs go off. The agents get sent to exotic locales to do dirty deeds. People get assassinated, kidnapped and tortured. Enemy agents try to infiltrate. Colleagues go rogue and have to be eliminated.

Leading man Don Draper is perfect for the switch. With his cruel smile, his conservative suits, his highballs, his wham-bam flings and the ‘60s setting, he’s always seemed vaguely James Bondish. Now he’s in charge of counter-intelligence. There’s a mole in the office who’s been killing secretaries (who aren’t really secretaries at all but intelligence analysts). Don suspects everyone. Is it the cynical Roger Sterling Jr.? The not-so innocent Peggy Olson?  Or maybe Bert Cooper, who’s only pretending to be a harmless old eccentric. Personally I think it’s that slimy little bastard Pete Campbell and I hope Peggy garrotes him after luring him into her office for a bit of fellatio.

The plots practically write themselves.  What if a secret rump group in the agency is plotting to assassinate JFK and Don must find them and stop them? Of course he doesn’t know that right after he succeeds, JFK will be assassinated anyway by the mob, the CIA, the Cubans, Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson all working together. The irony!

This thing is gonna work. Trust me, people.


Comments

Active Conversation
6 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lewis Grossberger and Lingo News, Pat Needles. Pat Needles said: Mad Men needs fixing and I know how – True/Slant http://bit.ly/18fLF9 [...]

  2. collapse expand

    I think the premise is great, but the execution lame. And how did Betty not call Don at the office when he didn’t come home for the entire night?

    Plotting seems lame. They set up stories that don’t get developed other than to be seductions.

    Now maybe someone can find a way to continue this thread to carp about Obama, which is what happens on many of my blog postings.

  3. collapse expand

    So John Deere mutilation doesn’t count, eh?

    It’s ironic you write this just as Betty finds “the box”, and Don’s whole world threatens to come apart. Probably. Eventually.

    Or she’ll just keep quiet for a season or two.

  4. collapse expand

    A little Ian Fleming? Actually, I could get into that.

  5. collapse expand

    “Garrotes” is good; any opportunity for televised garroting should work for most anyone.

    Other possibilities:

    Sal, having been canned for not allowing the Lucky Strike guy to get lucky, returns in an early-60’s version of Going Postal? (there were no shoot-ups in Mel Cooley’s office, right? This could be a “first!”)

    Little Sally Draper, instructed by the ghost of Grampa Gene, goes on a killing spree of the local bourgeoisie.

    Don’t know if animal blood counts, but you just *know* the schoolmarm will be boiling rabbits before this season’s out.

    Thanks for the fixes; I’ll be watching earnestly now.

  6. collapse expand

    Lewis,
    Sounds interesting. I could see this being plausible. Some recruiter comes in, asks them to be on the lookout for commies and fascists, and while they’re at it, do a few little things here and there. They could even add some international elements, get mixed up with MI5, or is this OSS times? Anyway, it sure would be interesting.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
 

About Me

Once I was a writer for the Old Media. But the Old Media went away and now I am a content provider for the New Media. That doesn’t necessarily mean I am more content or better provided for, only that times change.

I used to call this page ETAOIN SHRDLU but too many people asked me what ETAOIN SHRDLU meant and when I told them, they usually replied, “Who gives a fuck?” So now I’m calling it GROSSBLOGGER. As a result, some people now think my name is Lewis Grossblogger. I’m thinking of having it legally changed, just to end the confusion.

The subject I specialize in is: Everything in the Universe. I seldom write about anything outside of that. Why did I choose that topic? Well, first, because it’s my area of expertise and second, because I noticed that no one else was covering the beat.

So if you’re ever wondering what’s going on anywhere in or around the universe, this is the place to come for answers. Some of the answers may be wrong, but that’s not my fault; it’s Wikipedia’s. That’s where I get most of my information. Also I make up stuff, but a lot of it comes true later so if you’re concerned about accuracy, just wait.

Read me, follow me, bookmark me, e-mail me to all your friends and relatives and you will live a long and happy life. This is a scientific fact. I guarantee it.

See my profile »
Followers: 109
Contributor Since: May 2009
Location:New York