What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Jun. 22 2010 - 8:30 am | 1,354 views | 3 recommendations | 7 comments

Michael Hastings on General Stanley McChrystal

Update: Rolling Stone posts Michael Hastings’s full profile of General Stanley McChrystal online.

The big story of the day, perhaps the big story of the rest of the month, will be Afghanistan commander General Stanley McChrystal’s recall to Washington to explain remarks he made about President Obama and his administration in a forthcoming Rolling Stone profile. The profile was written by Michael Hastings, who has blogged for True/Slant since shortly after the site launched in 2009, sharing his abundance of insights on international affairs that come from lengthy experience covering the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This isn’t the first time Michael has written about the tense relationship between General McChrystal and Obama’s defense and security team. Back in October of last year, Michael looked at the growing tensions between McChrystal and Obama, likening them to the conflict that arose between President Harry S Truman and General Douglas MacArthur that led to the latter’s sacking, a benchmark moment in modern civil-military relations:

I don’t know what McChrystal is up to here, either. Has he overplayed his hand? I assume he must be really worried that he’s not going to get what he wants because he’s basically running around telling everybody that the war is going to be lost if he doesn’t. If he had more confidence, wouldn’t it be wiser to shut up?

Anyway, according to the always reliable British press, Obama’s people aren’t too pleased with all the public pressure the general has been putting on Obama. It might be a bit out of line, too. The story quotes constituional law expert Bruce Ackerman: “As commanding general, McChrystal has no business making such public pronouncements.”

BONUS HISTORICAL PRECEDENT? I’ve been reading about the relationship between General Douglas MacArthur and President Truman lately–this is a much smaller version of that.  The photo op thing, in particular, reminded me of MacArthur’s anger at Truman for a meeting they had in Hawaii right after Inchon in 1950. Truman called MacArthur to the meeting; Mac didn’t want to go, and he had refused to come to DC. MacArthur thought Truman was wasting his time, just playing politics–making the great general fly from Japan for a picture in the press to help in the upcoming elections! MacArthur was right about the politics parts, but Truman was also correct to eventually put the general in his place.

Before that, Michael suggested that McChrystal and company in “shaping the debate” over Afghanistan had gone as far as to “bully” the new president:

The threat from the McChrystal camp seems pretty significant to me. It’s really sending the message to Obama that ‘hey, you got no choice.’ One could even say that Obama is being bullied, and it’s unlikely he’s going to choose this moment to stand up to his generals.

And in May when McChrystal succeeded General David McKiernan in Afghanistan, Michael suggested that he was General David Petraeus’s ‘guy’, which leads to the question of whether Obama’s potential sacking of McChrystal for insubordination could have ramifications higher up the chain of command.

I’m not sure we’ll be hearing much more from Michael on this story on his True/Slant blog, but do watch Rolling Stone for when his story goes online, possibly tonight or tomorrow morning.

Bonus more recent analogy: In keeping with Michael’s habit of affixing ‘bonus’ analyses to the end of his blog posts, I thought it might be worth considering another parallel beyond the Truman-MacArthur dyad – that of Admiral William “Fox” Fallon. Admiral Fallon was the head of US Central Command – now General Petraeus’s post – and was removed from his position in 2008. Some speculated that his military career came to an end because he opposed elements within the Bush administration who wanted to step up military pressure on Iran. They pointed in particular to a profile of the Admiral in Esquire magazine written by Thomas Barnett, in which he expressed some criticisms that are not entirely unlike what Hastings apparently got out of McChrystal.

Of course, the difference is that Fallon stepped up his criticisms of Bush while that commander-in-chief was on his way out, in contrast to McChrystal whose CINC is in the middle of his first term. But you really just have to wonder: do these guys want to be martyred by their presidents? A review of Douglas MacArthur’s “old soldiers never die” speech made it clear that he had a political case to make for sustained American military engagement in Asia that transcended his military service. Perhaps McChrystal has the same intentions. Of course, maybe he wants it to come out that way – after all, MacArthur’s dissent from Truman may have formed the basis for the ‘dominoes’ theory of US foreign policy in Asia during the early Cold War – McChrystal after being struck down may prove more powerful than he is as commander of forces in Afghanistan.

Update: Politico’s Mike Allen posts a PDF of the full Michael Hastings Rolling Stone feature for your perusal.


Comments

Active Conversation
One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 7 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    I think the General crossed a line that forces the WH to ask for his resignation at best. He could and should have made his concerns known behind closed doors- however we may yet learn much as I have a feeling a book is coming that will shake things up, there is something strange about that arena being hidden from us.

    I remember when Admiral L. Smith retired (who I proudly state I was commanded by), he took a few shots at the politicians on his way out of Bosnia, but that is the way to do it, on the way out.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leighton_W._Smith,_Jr.

    http://www.thepilot.com/news/2010/may/30/serving-his-country-snuffy-smiths-choices-lead-dis/

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm waiting for the day when I can get the news directly into my brain. Until then, I'll be lit up by the electric glow of screens, chasing the latest breaking like the hopeless news junkie I am. Ever since the Encyclopaedia Britannica tried to launch a web portal ten years ago, I've seen many ends of the online news spectrum, from my time as a political news reporter for both RawStory.com and the Huffington Post to the better part of a year I spent running the late New York Sun's website. There have been a lot of other stops in between. Now I am your homepage editorial overlord. But I haven't let it go to my head. Yet.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 336
    Contributor Since: November 2008
    Location:True/Slant's Mountain Lair

    What I'm Up To

    • The Morningside Post

      I’m a founding editor of The Morningside Post, the community blog for Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs

      picture-6

       
    • 2960885091_89af285ac5_moff off wall street

      where I go to write

      things too impolite

      for work

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.