What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Jun. 8 2010 - 3:13 pm | 305 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

Why Blanche Lincoln will defeat Bill Halter in the Arkansas Senate run-off

Blanche Lincoln, democratic senator for Arkans...

Image via Wikipedia

First off, this is just prognostication, and if you are an Arkansas Democrat, you should vote before polls close in your state tonight.

Whoever wins in the Democratic Senate primary run-off this evening in Arkansas doesn’t really matter. Neither Blanche Lincoln nor Bill Halter is likely to defeat Republican Rep. John Boozman down the line. In November, Arkansas’s currently blue Senate seat is set to turn red.

In the meanwhile, a lot of predictions are streaming in that Lincoln is preparing for defeat, and that Halter will win, by as much as 7 to 10 percent according to Arkansas insiders quoted by Mike Allen. But I’m having trouble believing the polls will play out this way. It’s Lincoln’s race to lose, for sure, but most likely in November.

Now it’s possible that Lincoln’s supporters aren’t nearly as enthusiastic about voting for her a second time as Halter’s will be to seal the deal. That’s the factor that could deliver the race to Halter – a more riled up core of supporters who will do everything they can to crown him the upset Democratic nominee. And with a slim lead over Halter last time around – about 2% – that could count in the pinch.

But the only recent published poll that shows Halter winning, by 4% from Research2000 as of June 2-4, has some troubles with its methods. For instance, 48% of the people they polled voted for Halter in May, but only 42% of the actual Democratic electorate voted that way in the real election. So the R2K poll that show him leading is polling a greater share of likely Halter supporters than actually cast ballots last time around.

And, 3% of the 600 voters they polled didn’t vote in May, and of that group, 41% of them say they’d rather vote for Halter (to Lincoln’s 21%). How many more Arkansans would prefer to vote for Halter, but won’t bother turning out for him?

All told, the poll showed 6% undecided, and that group could break for Lincoln in substantial enough quantities to give her the padding she needs to win it. If I had someone to bet with on this race, I’d definitely bet that she’ll edge him out by a small amount, not much different than she did in May.

Then, she’ll lose in November, overtaken not by an anti-incumbent mood, but by an anti-Democratic mood in Arkansas. Story over.


2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I'm waiting for the day when I can get the news directly into my brain. Until then, I'll be lit up by the electric glow of screens, chasing the latest breaking like the hopeless news junkie I am. Ever since the Encyclopaedia Britannica tried to launch a web portal ten years ago, I've seen many ends of the online news spectrum, from my time as a political news reporter for both RawStory.com and the Huffington Post to the better part of a year I spent running the late New York Sun's website. There have been a lot of other stops in between. Now I am your homepage editorial overlord. But I haven't let it go to my head. Yet.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 336
    Contributor Since: November 2008
    Location:True/Slant's Mountain Lair

    What I'm Up To

    • The Morningside Post

      I’m a founding editor of The Morningside Post, the community blog for Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs


    • 2960885091_89af285ac5_moff off wall street

      where I go to write

      things too impolite

      for work

    • +O
    • +O