What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Apr. 14 2010 - 3:30 pm | 204 views | 0 recommendations | 6 comments

Tea Partiers finally admit they want to dip their balls in it

I’ve never been one to call Tea Party members ‘Teabaggers.’ I think slurs like that amplify conflict between people already angry enough at one another. It’s the same reason I avoid phrases like ‘Repubs’ or ‘Dems’ or ‘Libs’ or ‘Cons’ – the shortness seems intended to stick in one’s craw rather than get one’s point across to an audience that possibly isn’t receptive.

But it was funny to see at least one pro-Tea Party guy, David Nussbaum, or is that YouTube user ’since1773′, embrace the ‘Teabagger’ appellation in this video:

Yeah, OK, it’s a little rude to throw a bunch of wet tea bags (i.e. testicles) on a photo of Speaker Nancy Pelosi. But I think it’s fair of Tea Party members, a semi-organized political force in this country, to object to the dismissal of their political advocacy as ‘teabagging.’ And I’ll take this kind of expression over the visual violence of painting crosshairs over Congressional districts any day.

Allahpundit of Hot Air, who brought this video to my attention on Twitter, wondered when it would prompt outrage over sexism. To which I replied, “Right, accuse us of dipping our balls in things for a year and then get angry when we actually do.”

And you know what this really made me think of? Louie from MTV’s late, great, ‘The State.’ You know he just ‘WANTS TO DIP HIS BALLS IN IT’:


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 6 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    If american patriots are teabaggers…..then pelosi, reid, obama must be the redcoats….

  2. collapse expand

    Let’s not stop here, Michael. If these folks are going to throw “tea bags” around to prove their point, let’s suggest other things they can throw at people, starting with hundreds of crisp, new $100 bills into the bank accounts of every single one of the True/Slant writers. So let’s start referring to them as such, and see what happens. Oh, the wonders of reverse psychology! What do you say about that?

  3. collapse expand

    You are talking out of 2 sides of your mouth. Again, Michael, you are no humorist.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm waiting for the day when I can get the news directly into my brain. Until then, I'll be lit up by the electric glow of screens, chasing the latest breaking like the hopeless news junkie I am. Ever since the Encyclopaedia Britannica tried to launch a web portal ten years ago, I've seen many ends of the online news spectrum, from my time as a political news reporter for both RawStory.com and the Huffington Post to the better part of a year I spent running the late New York Sun's website. There have been a lot of other stops in between. Now I am your homepage editorial overlord. But I haven't let it go to my head. Yet.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 335
    Contributor Since: November 2008
    Location:True/Slant's Mountain Lair

    What I'm Up To

    • The Morningside Post

      I’m a founding editor of The Morningside Post, the community blog for Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs

      picture-6

       
    • 2960885091_89af285ac5_moff off wall street

      where I go to write

      things too impolite

      for work

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.