What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Mar. 21 2010 - 10:13 am | 71 views | 1 recommendation | 1 comment

When we say March Madness, we mean *madness*

Last year I joked around about President Obama’s bracket containing a lot of scratch-outs and said that a commander-in-chief should be more certain about his picks. But I was joking.

Victorino Matus, deputy managing editor of the Weekly Standard, published the following at the magazine’s website last night:

Last year President Barack Obama filled out his NCAA tournament bracket and predicted (as many did) that North Carolina would take the whole thing. He was right. And he was very popular at the time, too, I might add. This year the president’s approval numbers have tanked—he’s somewhere around 46 percent at the moment. And this year he picked Kansas to win the NCAA tournament—the Jayhawks entered the tourney as the overall number one seed. And earlier today in the second round they were eliminated by number nine seed Northern Iowa, 69-67. What else will he get wrong in 2010?

To be honest, the president had a couple of good upset picks—the kinds that you would make if you read a decent amount about college hoops. (Conservatives are justified in ridiculing the commander in chief for the amount of time he must spend reading up on the game as opposed to figuring out how to create jobs. They are also right to think that if this were the previous president, he would be mocked for this instead of perceived as cool. For instance, Bush spent way too much time working out at the gym—shouldn’t he have been more focused on Iraq? In contrast, President Obama spends at least an hour each day working out and thank God for that—he’s sending a positive message to our youth and grappling the issue of childhood obesity, which his predecessor didn’t care about. He was too busy wasting his time in the gym to care about anything! But I digress.)

via Obama is Doomed… | The Weekly Standard.

Wow. He’s serious – look at the length of his ‘digression.’ I mean, I know the Weekly Standard is of slightly poorer quality than the National Review, but what’s with this guy? I thought deputy managing editors at TWS just unplugged the toilets after Bill Kristol was done clogging them up with his insights. Apparently, they like filling the sewers under the TWS with thoughts of their own. Matus chose to spend pieces of his Saturday night playing Sovietology with the President’s bracketology and coming up with two wrongs make a right arguments related to Obama’s and his predecessor’s workout habits. March Madness indeed.


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm waiting for the day when I can get the news directly into my brain. Until then, I'll be lit up by the electric glow of screens, chasing the latest breaking like the hopeless news junkie I am. Ever since the Encyclopaedia Britannica tried to launch a web portal ten years ago, I've seen many ends of the online news spectrum, from my time as a political news reporter for both RawStory.com and the Huffington Post to the better part of a year I spent running the late New York Sun's website. There have been a lot of other stops in between. Now I am your homepage editorial overlord. But I haven't let it go to my head. Yet.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 335
    Contributor Since: November 2008
    Location:True/Slant's Mountain Lair

    What I'm Up To

    • The Morningside Post

      I’m a founding editor of The Morningside Post, the community blog for Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs

      picture-6

       
    • 2960885091_89af285ac5_moff off wall street

      where I go to write

      things too impolite

      for work

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.