<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rudy Giuliani out means David Paterson is up?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/level/2009/11/19/rudy-giuliani-out-means-david-paterson-is-up-governor-senate-new-york-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/level/2009/11/19/rudy-giuliani-out-means-david-paterson-is-up-governor-senate-new-york-2010/</link>
	<description>[Please go to &#039;Settings&#039; to change your Tagline]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 06:50:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Roston</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/level/2009/11/19/rudy-giuliani-out-means-david-paterson-is-up-governor-senate-new-york-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/level/?p=3412#comment-809</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s a matter of the NY Dems merely &#039;preferring&#039; that he not run. It&#039;s more a matter of will major donors and bundlers say they don&#039;t want to pay for a race that doesn&#039;t look like it needs to be waged? Even with Cuomo&#039;s popularity, Paterson&#039;s incumbency does yield some advantages. And an ugly fight between the two would be harmful to tamping down any kind of Republican break-out.

I think it&#039;s clear: Paterson could beat Lazio, and probably without it being too much of a squeaker. So unless you&#039;re hoping Cuomo is some day going to make a run at say Vice President in 2012, or DNC Chair when Kaine is done, and in short order, advancing him to Albany doesn&#039;t yield that much advantage for the national Democratic organization in the short term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s a matter of the NY Dems merely &#8216;preferring&#8217; that he not run. It&#8217;s more a matter of will major donors and bundlers say they don&#8217;t want to pay for a race that doesn&#8217;t look like it needs to be waged? Even with Cuomo&#8217;s popularity, Paterson&#8217;s incumbency does yield some advantages. And an ugly fight between the two would be harmful to tamping down any kind of Republican break-out.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s clear: Paterson could beat Lazio, and probably without it being too much of a squeaker. So unless you&#8217;re hoping Cuomo is some day going to make a run at say Vice President in 2012, or DNC Chair when Kaine is done, and in short order, advancing him to Albany doesn&#8217;t yield that much advantage for the national Democratic organization in the short term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ungar</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/level/2009/11/19/rudy-giuliani-out-means-david-paterson-is-up-governor-senate-new-york-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ungar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/level/?p=3412#comment-808</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Cuomo would pass on the race simply because the Dem. Party would prefer it to be a cheaper election. He wants it and he appears to be a slam dunk to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Cuomo would pass on the race simply because the Dem. Party would prefer it to be a cheaper election. He wants it and he appears to be a slam dunk to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

