What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Nov. 19 2009 - 12:15 pm | 64 views | 3 recommendations | 2 comments

Does this sound like a health care debate the Democrats will lose?

The Washington Times is reporting that Senator Tom Coburn, the Oklahoma Republican who once said your neighbors could solve our nation’s health care problems, wants the entire Democratic health care reform bill to be read aloud on the floor of the Senate:

The 2,074-page Senate health care bill would take 34 hours to read cover to cover — and that’s just what Sen. Tom Coburn wants done on the Senate floor.

The Oklahoma Republican has threatened to invoke parliamentary rules to force the Senate clerk (or more likely, a team of clerks) to read the massive bill before the full Senate begins formal debate on the legislation.

The move is strictly according to Senate rules, which say any senator can demand a bill be read in its entirety before debate begins. While Democrats could, if they wish, repeatedly make motions to end the soliloquy, Republicans on the floor could object, and the reading would continue.

via Health bill could get 34-hour reading in Senate – Washington Times.

Consider the optics here: Yes, it’s a delaying tactic. But if you’re Senator Mitch McConnell on your way to lead the Senate’s Republicans up against a commanding Democratic majority, isn’t your argument that Majority Leader Harry Reid doesn’t have the 60 votes he needs to invoke cloture on a filibuster of the bill? Doesn’t delaying the debate and eventual vote show that you don’t have what you need to defeat the bill?

Perhaps we underestimated Senator Reid and the Democrats should all be smiling right now.

But hey, if Coburn really wants to go there, maybe the Democrats can pull a page out of Henry Waxman’s playbook and red-shirt an ex-NDT/CEDA college policy debater as a Senate clerk. If that kid could get through 1 page in 34 seconds, it brings the time down to about 19 and a half hours.

And that guy wasn’t even fast. A good former First Affirmative Rebuttalist (1AR) should be able to speed read or ’spread’ his way through that bill in about 8 hours at the most. But watch out for those wily card-clipping 1ARs.

(If you understand any of that, please out yourself as a former traveler on the college debate crazy train.)


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Not to mention how fast some professional cattle auctioneers could get through it.

  2. collapse expand

    [...] As I’ve said before, this isn’t a sign of strength. If you can beat a bill, you let it go to a vote. If you can’t beat a bill, you drag it out as long as possible to excite your base before you go down in flames. [...]

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
 

About Me

I'm waiting for the day when I can get the news directly into my brain. Until then, I'll be lit up by the electric glow of screens, chasing the latest breaking like the hopeless news junkie I am. Ever since the Encyclopaedia Britannica tried to launch a web portal ten years ago, I've seen many ends of the online news spectrum, from my time as a political news reporter for both RawStory.com and the Huffington Post to the better part of a year I spent running the late New York Sun's website. There have been a lot of other stops in between. Now I am your homepage editorial overlord. But I haven't let it go to my head. Yet.

See my profile »
Followers: 216
Contributor Since: November 2008
Location:True/Slant's Mountain Lair

What I'm Up To

  • The Morningside Post

    I’m a founding editor of The Morningside Post, the community blog for Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs

    picture-6

     
  • 2960885091_89af285ac5_moff off wall street

    where I go to write

    things too impolite

    for work

     
.<
  • +O
  • +O
>.