What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Aug. 31 2009 - 10:42 am | 304 views | 0 recommendations | 3 comments

The likely outcome of the Disney-Marvel Comics merger

The LA Times in its coverage of the acquisition of Marvel Comics by entertainment leviathan Walt Disney plays up the control Disney will get over Marvel’s library of characters.

The acquisition would give Disney access to a library of more than 5,000 characters — several of whom have inspired major films for other Hollywood studios. Marvel, meanwhile, gains the clout of Disney’s ability to take a popular character and make money on it through films, television and licensed merchandise.

“We believe that adding Marvel to Disney’s unique portfolio of brands provides significant opportunities for long-term growth and value creation,” said Disney President and Chief Executive Robert A. Iger.

via Disney to acquire Marvel in deal worth $4 billion | Company Town | Los Angeles Times.

This can mean only one thing:

WolvieMickey

(HT: Super Punch)

Or, if you prefer, here’s our Allison Kilkenny’s version.

Honestly, I’d like to see the fine print in this contract. Will Disney also be acquiring Stan Lee’s closely guarded formula for adamantium steel? Will they make the Disney World monorail out of it so that there will never again be a deadly crash?


Comments

2 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 3 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    As a roller-coaster fan, I’m wondering what happens to the Hulk and Spiderman rides at Universal Studios’ Islands of Adventure in Orlando. Marvel has a very heavy presence near, but not at, Disney World.

    • collapse expand

      Ditto Bob… Spiderman is the coolest amusement ride ever.

      I’m curious what this also portends, re: Disney’s access to the Marvel character line. For example, does this mean that we can expect a typical Disney ‘family friendly’ Age of Apocalypse movie with Dakota Fanning, Tom Hanks and a dog who is smarter than every human (and mutant) in the film?

      In response to another comment. See in context »
  2. collapse expand

    Unfortunately what its means is that another independent film company has gone corporate. It was the independents that proved there was money in small quirky films, foreign films, horror and science fiction and they have all been co-oped by the big boys. They proved that films didn’t need big stars or big budgets and now none of them can make a film under 15 million or have the nerve to go with unknowns. I find it sad.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
 

About Me

I'm waiting for the day when I can get the news directly into my brain. Until then, I'll be lit up by the electric glow of screens, chasing the latest breaking like the hopeless news junkie I am. Ever since the Encyclopaedia Britannica tried to launch a web portal ten years ago, I've seen many ends of the online news spectrum, from my time as a political news reporter for both RawStory.com and the Huffington Post to the better part of a year I spent running the late New York Sun's website. There have been a lot of other stops in between. Now I am your homepage editorial overlord. But I haven't let it go to my head. Yet.

See my profile »
Followers: 216
Contributor Since: November 2008
Location:True/Slant's Mountain Lair

What I'm Up To

  • The Morningside Post

    I’m a founding editor of The Morningside Post, the community blog for Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs

    picture-6

     
  • 2960885091_89af285ac5_moff off wall street

    where I go to write

    things too impolite

    for work

     
.<
  • +O
  • +O
>.