What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Mar. 9 2010 - 11:48 am | 692 views | 1 recommendation | 1 comment

Sex Ed in Utah: Feel shame, act stupidly, pay the price

pregnant silhouette

Image by mahalie via Flickr

Utah is an interesting state, a case study in the mixing of conservative Christianity and ultra-conservative politics with CRACK.  Nothing else could explain the series of stupid decisions being made about sex, birth control, and the law.

With one of the most shame-inducing “Abstinence Only” sex education programs in their public schools and a majority population steeped in a conservative Christian belief that sex should only be to make babies, Utah must live with the obvious results of teaching young people that they should feel shame and disgust around sexual pleasure.  In Utah, you can’t even say “Abstinence is the best policy, but if you’re not abstinent, use a condom to prevent pregnancy and disease.”  Instead, “Abstinence ONLY” is what teens get and then they do what teens always do:  they have sex.

The results of not having safer sex education are that every day in Utah, 12 teenaged girls become pregnant and they’re more likely to get chlamydia than the flu or chicken pox.  Ninety-three percent of women in Utah live in counties with no abortion providers. And now, if a woman or girl gets pregnant in Utah and miscarries due to “intentional behavior,” the state can send her to jail.

The law, signed into effect yesterday,  was supposedly a more careful one than the original bill that could have sent women who miscarried to jail for any “reckless” behavior.  However, the new law represents the real possibility that women could be prosecuted for miscarrying.  According to Democratic Senator Ben McAdams,

the revised bill still sets a dangerous precedent that would “open up a Pandora’s box” of unintended legal consequences that will be hard to reverse. “Even the word ‘knowingly’ will result in unintended consequences.”

So why is the media reporting that the new law won’t send women and girls to jail for miscarrying?  According to the AP story,

The version of the bill Herbert signed excludes language in an original version that opponents feared could lead to pregnant women who have natural miscarriages or miscarriages while engaging in activities like skiing being investigated for criminal homicide.

But in fact both Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union continue to voice concern that the version passed will make any woman who miscarries a “potential criminal” who would have to “prove” her innocence.

Instead of reporting on the dangers of the Utah law, the media is spending a lot of time reporting on the rather sad criminal case that inspired its drafting: a 17 year-old girl who paid a young man $150 to beat her up so that she could terminate her 7-month pregnancy.  The beating did not result in a termination of the pregnancy (the baby was born and subsequently adopted), but it did result in prosecution for both the young woman and the man who beat her.

A fascinating story, full of tragedy, but the real story is the effects of the Christian Taliban on this country and particularly our young people.

Barred from the knowledge of how to control their fertility or keep their bodies free of sexually transmitted diseases, steeped in shame about having sex in the first place, fed a steady media diet that both makes everything about sex and also makes sex a problem, young people act rashly, stupidly even, and then pay the price of STDs and unwanted pregnancies.  Now, in Utah, some of them will also go to jail.


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    This is totally confusing. Not your writing. The idea of a state legally being able to pass laws like that. So next on the religious right’s male chauvinist agenda is literally forcing women to stay barefoot, pregnant, and ignorant? I suppose if there was a conviction for breaking this “miscarriage” law, it could always be brought to the SCOTUS, but then again, good luck with that. ugh.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm an academic who does not believe in abstract knowledge. Like Marx, I think the point isn't just to describe the world, but to change it. Unlike Marx I don't have Engels sending me my monthly rent. So I have a day job teaching sociology at Middlebury College. In my real life, I'm a fighter (taekwondo) and a writer

    (Salon, Legal Affairs, NPR's "All Things Considered") and now this blog. My second book, American Plastic: Boob Jobs, Credit Cards, and the Spirit of Our Time, is a critique of neoliberal capitalism through cosmetic surgery. American Plastic will be published by Beacon in 2010.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 221
    Contributor Since: December 2008
    Location:Montreal, QC & Burlington, VT

    What I'm Up To

    Buy the book

    If you want to buy my book now and avoid the holiday rush (obviously it will be a hot hot item come December- kinda like an i-Pad or maybe more like a Cabbage Patch Doll?) you can do it here.