Bears Lose Games … and Sense of Class
2009 hasn’t exactly panned out the way the Chicago Bears had originally envisioned. The trade for golden boy QB Jay Cutler has yielded 14 touchdowns to an astounding 17 interceptions. Injuries to defensive players such as Brian Urlacher, among others, have humbled a once-mighty unit. And a 4-5 record, third place in the NFC North, haven’t completely satisfied Super Bowl predictions of the preseason.
Alright, let’s not sugarcoat this any longer: 2009 has been an abject failure. And the three stooges above — GM Jerry Angelo, Cutler, and Head Coach Lovie Smith — have, to paraphrase R-I-C-K-Y Ricardo, a whole lot of explaining to do.
But W’s and L’s are one thing. In retrospect, we probably expected too much from Cutler and the Bears, especially with Mr. Favre’s return to the Midwest and noticeable personnel weaknesses on both sides of the ball.
Yet these recent disappointments have led to gross contradictions of the class previously embodied by the Bears organization. Two weeks ago, DT Tommie Harris got ejected for a sucker punch only minutes into the first quarter. This week, the Bears refused an interview request from NBC, who is producing a pregame report detailing the team’s struggles.
I’ll be the first to admit these interviews are largely worthless exercises in time-wasting and sports cliches. And that the Bears are under no legal or contractual obligation to sit through 15 minutes of Bob Costas (who, as a pretty decent sports journalist, deserves better treatment).
But as far as Smith’s excuses for skipping the chit-chat — focus on the upcoming game, its their fourth prime time slate, ect — they’re plain baloney. NBC pays millions of dollars to broadcast NFL games … which help pay for the luxuries of playing, coaching, and working in the League. The Bears owe it to their ticket-and-merchandise-buying fans to show face, at the very least. This all reeks of sour grapes, especially since Chicago’s last game featured five interceptions by Cutler.
Dick Jauron became the first coach to be fired in 2009 this week. The former Bears coach, though not immensely successful on the field, is widely respected for his humility and class off it. If the Smith regime continues its stunning lack of courtesy, I’d gladly take Jauron back into the fold.
The Bears won’t win the 2010 Super Bowl anyway; let’s hope they don’t lose the goodwill of fans and media members as well.
Post Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment
T/S Members
Log in with your True/Slant account.













No more Jauron. Please. Read down about 9 paragraphs on this post by Gregg Easterbrook: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/090929&sportCat=nfl
“Cheerio Chaps” fits him perfectly. (I am a Bears fan but also cheered on Buffalo during the Kelly days. 0-4 Superbowls but at least they got there.)
Ouch, “Cheerio Chaps” eh?
Point well taken, and thanks for making it. I’m not saying that the Bears ought to rehire ol’ Chaps for 2010 — I’m just saying that it’d be infinitely preferable, if I must watch my team lose, to be able to keep my head high than be embarrassed by the team’s behavior. With Jauron, we’d get the former; with Smith, we’ve been getting the latter as of late.
Consider, too, that Jauron may not have been as bad as it seemed. SI’s Jim Trotter (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/jim_trotter/11/17/Bills.Jauron/index.html) and Ross Tucker (second-to-last question: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/ross_tucker/11/20/games/index.html) seem to agree with me. He’s a defensive guy — imagine if he’d had a remotely decent offense while in Chicago or Buffalo. TO wasn’t the answer this year for the Bills, nor was starting a Harvard QB because of injuries. He’s not all the bad, and certainly not “Cheerio Chaps.”
With that said, bring on Mike Shanahan, Leslie Frazier, et al.!
In response to another comment. See in context »