What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Sep. 16 2009 - 7:04 am | 228 views | 1 recommendation | 13 comments

Krakauer speaks: As his new release hits shelves, an intimate recap of an accidental career

krakauerFrom the windows of his home outside Boulder, Colorado, Jon Krakauer can look west to find the silhouettes of the Flatiron mountains. With a self-imposed writing regimen that dominates his waking hours, Krakauer often wishes he spent more time outside, in the silent respite he finds on climbs of those nearby peaks. So incompatible are his two passions – to climb and to write – that he spends most of his workday contained in a basement office, with nary a window to tempt the inner adventure seeker.

It is from this underground isolation that he reaches me, as I navigate the characteristic New York bustle of human commotion while inspecting toilet paper brands in an aisle of Whole Foods. Ironic, as the notoriously withdrawn Krakauer would likely bristle with discomfort at the claustrophobic mania of a grocery store on this Saturday afternoon. But there is no time to share a bemused moment.

“I don’t really give interviews,” his gruff voice pronounces bluntly, alone in an office lair some 1,600 miles away. “But I’ll give you a few minutes.”

He pauses. “Now.”

Though hardly the most auspicious of beginnings for an interview, a few minutes turn into an hour, and notes scribbled onto post-consumer recycled napkins soon reveal the career of a man whose consistent, daily writing routine belies the accidental nature of his introduction to journalism, and the distaste he feels whenever he sits down to work.

“Every single time I write, I ask myself what the fuck I’m doing, why the fuck I’m writing,” he says, comfortably off-the-cuff at the midway point of our conversation. “Every book I finish, I swear I’ll never write another one.”He’s been obsessed with climbing since childhood, but Krakauer never had the same enthusiasm for writing. After earning a degree in environmental studies from Hampshire College, he spent his 20’s working odd jobs, then venturing out to get his fix  in the mountains. When he married wife Linda in 1980, Krakauer was ready to slow down and earn a steady income, but work in his trade of choice, carpentry, was hard to find. It was then that a former professor at Hampshire, David Roberts, himself a longtime outdoors writer, suggested freelancing.

“He said that freelance writing was the best gig you could get, and I always said I’d never do it,” Krakauer recalls. “It was a last resort, but I gave it a shot and it paid the bills.”

krakauer-1That backup plan was soon a full-time job, as he successfully pitched stories to Rolling Stone, Smithsonian, and a handful of small, now defunct fitness magazines. In 1993, Krakauer landed a staff writing position with Outside, where he would pen the articles that became his bestselling adventure books, Into The Wild and Into Thin Air. Despite success in the early 90’s, Krakauer struggled to earn a living, and calls ninety percent of his magazine work from the decade, most notably a fitness column for Playboy, “total crap” done for paycheck rather than passion.

Not that he regrets it. Instead, Krakauer prefers to think of his earlier articles, like low-carb manifesto “Carbo-Unloading,” or paean to flexibility “Fitness Smarts: It’s a Stretch,” as lessons in concise writing – and padding for his resume. By the time Krakauer wrote his first full-length book, Into The Wild, he had published nearly 100 magazine and newspaper articles, most of them on the familiar topics of fitness and the outdoors.

***

It was Krakauer’s close friend, Mark Bryant, the editor of Outside in the 90’s, who assigned him the story of Chris McCandless, the 24-year-old whose fatal venture into the Alaskan wilderness was the subject of Krakauer’s first book, published in 1996 as an expanded version of the 1993 article he wrote for Outside. Krakauer’s initial reaction to Chris’s life and death is emblematic of the endless curiosity that informs his writing, Bryant says.

“I had read this little blurb in the paper about a kid who died hiking in Alaska, and I asked Jon to follow up. Within three days he was completely obsessed, making calls, wanted to go to Alaska, find the bus where Chris had died, meet his parents,” Bryant says. “He was gone.”

But Krakauer’s curiosity soon turned obsessive, as he became haunted by the similarities between himself and his subject. In McCandless, Krakauer had found another stubborn, lonely soul; a man at home in the solitude of nature. Krakauer writes that he was struck by “the parallels between events in his life and those in my own,” most notably a reckless passion for risk and adventure, and a fragile paternal connection. The strained nature of McCandless’ relationship with his father permeates the book, and it’s a situation that Krakauer empathizes with on paper, but shies away from discussing.

krakauerI’m met with a thick, unyielding silence when I bring up Krakauer’s childhood on the phone. “Anything I’ll say about that I’ve said [in the book],” he tells me. “It played into my connection to Chris and those events, but Chris was an amazing person in his own right and he had his own story. That’s what I wanted to tell.”

Reviewers were almost unanimous in their praise of the book. The Los Angeles Times Book Review noted Krakauer’s “telling eye for detail” and Men’s Journal remarked that his intimate narrative transported readers into the tortured depths of McCandless’ “heart and soul.” Krakauer’s debut spent two years on the New York Times bestseller list, and saw a resurgence in popularity in 2007, after Sean Penn directed a well-received film adaptation of the story.

***

With a hit book and ebullient praise from reviewers, Krakauer suddenly became a bestselling author and respected adventure writer. Already reeling from this success, his secluded world was soon disrupted again, after the death of eight fellow climbers during Krakauer’s 1996 ascent of Mount Everest for an article commissioned by Outside. Ironically, Krakauer had intended to document the very dangers, wrought by the fervent commercialization of the mountain, that would befall his own team.

“Everest changed Jon, completely and totally, and how could it not?” says Bryant, who recalls hour-long phone calls with a tearful, anguished Krakauer in the days following the tragedy. It was Bryant who had given the final thumbs-up for Krakauer to travel to Nepal, in hopes of attaining the summit of Everest under the guidance of Rob Hall, a seasoned climber who would perish on the trip. Although the editors at Outside didn’t want Krakauer to ascend the mountain, Bryant knew the stubborn adventurer wouldn’t have it any other way.

“Sitting at base camp and writing about other people wasn’t something he was prepared to do,” Bryant recalls. “So we gave the go-ahead for him to climb, and he was intent on reaching the summit.”

Sadly, Krakauer’s experience on Everest epitomized the dangers he had set out to document: nine climbers perished on the trek, after a blizzard struck while Krakauer’s group made their way to the summit. In his book, Krakauer ruminates on grief and culpability, and the arrogant hubris that characterizes anyone rash enough to attempt Everest. “It was titillating to brush up against the enigma of immortality,” he writes of the climb, which he says forced him to confront his own mortality. “The stain this has left on my psyche is not the sort of thing that washes off.”

Shaken and disturbed, Krakauer returned home to Colorado. Almost immediately, he started to write. Brad Wetzler, an editor at Outside who worked with Krakauer on the article, recalls waiting by the fax machine for each page of the 25,000 word draft.
“A lot of people told Jon to wait, get his head right and sort himself out,” Wetzler recalls of Krakauer’s agonizing aftershock following the three month journey. “But he insisted on writing it immediately – I think as a catharsis, or a purging of what had gone on up there.”

What followed was an 18,000 word article for Outside, published in September of 1996, only three months after his return from Nepal. Soon after, Krakauer released a longer book, Into Thin Air, in hopes of correcting errors made in the rush to write his article, which he admits was marred by “memories distorted by exhaustion, oxygen depletion, and shock.”

The book spent two years on bestseller lists and was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize. Still, debates over Krakauer’s account persisted, culminating in the 1997 release of The Climb, a defense of Everest guide Anatoli Boureev, whom Krakauer alleges was responsible for reckless, fatal missteps on the mountain.

“I was getting death threats, and they were legitimate ones that had the FBI on alert,” Krakauer says of the controversy elicited by the book. “People called me an opportunist, a liar, a murderer – and those were the gentle people.”

Already quiet and guarded, Krakauer took on a new intensity about his private life, granting few interviews and bucking against his now firmly solidified reputation as an outdoors writer. In the six years that followed, he wrote only three magazine articles, opting instead to dedicate himself to a book that would defy his status as an outdoors-only journalist: religion.

***

Having grown up surrounded by Mormons in Corvallis, Oregon, Krakauer had long been fascinated by the faith, and decided to capitalize on his bestselling prestige to challenge his reputation. After the controversy he courted with Into Thin Air, Krakauer’s decision to report on the contentious history of the Mormon church is surprising, but he says he can’t ignore the topics that pique his curiosity. “When a subject grabs me, the way Chris did or the way Everest was such a formidable challenge, I’m fixated on it,” he says.

510e2nq2yxlThe starting point of Krakauer’s research was the 1984 murder of Brenda Lafferty, and her infant daughter Erica, at the hands of Brenda’s fanatical brothers-in-law, Dan and Ron Lafferty. After several disturbing jailhouse interviews with Dan, still ardently remorseless nearly a decade after the murders, Krakauer embarked on three years of research to trace the origins of the religion and its dual incarnations as mainstream faith and fundamentalist sect. The result was Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith, a book that was met with skepticism from Krakauer’s publishers at Random House. When his editor read the first 100 pages, she sent Krakauer an email lamenting “a lack of mountains in this,” to which he responded by moving to Simon & Schuster, who published the book in 2003.

Krakauer was out of his element, and according to some reviewers, it showed. Accustomed to Krakauer’s intimate understanding of his topic, several critics lamented his incomplete portrayal of the Mormon Church,  and The Yale Review of Books contends that Krakauer’s “intransigent beliefs [about religion] cloud his ability…to delve deeply into important questions.” Still, others saw past his adventure-writer persona, recognizing Krakauer as a narrator with a knack for vivid, insightful reporting. A review in Publishers Weekly praised his talents as a “journalist and storyteller” and USA Today called Krakauer “a preeminent, intrepid reporter.”

What did Krakauer think of the reaction to his foray into a new genre of non-fiction? He couldn’t have cared less. After two bestselling books and two decades of magazine work, Krakauer had the financial security, and the reputation, to write whatever he wanted.

“I didn’t need the money, I don’t care about fame, and I could get something published if I wanted to,” he says. “I just do what interests me, and this was a story I’d been wanting to research for a long time.”

***

It is this, the challenge of research, that lures Krakauer from the secluded comfort of his wife, his home, and his mountains. He’s never hired an assistant, preferring to travel to his subjects and interview them in person. Often, Krakauer admits that he overdoes reporting to delay the inevitable challenge of sitting down to write a first draft – a process that he finds agonizingly difficult.

Although his finished work shows no sign of struggle, Krakauer credits his editors with giving direction on structure and syntax. Bryant, however, says he thinks that Krakauer’s distaste for writing yields a clean, unique style.

“Jon has this no nonsense way with words, he just cuts away the fat and leaves you with this basic, raw work,” Bryant says, adding that Krakauer may ask editors for guidance on his overall direction, but when it comes to line-by-line edits, he’s notoriously stubborn.

“With Jon, it’s direction, but never dictation,” Bryant says.

Krakauer’s stubborn insistence on controlling each line of his writing is paralleled by his refusal to adhere to expectations of publishers, reviewers – even fans – who see him as, at heart, an outdoors writer. Though he admits that writing about mountains comes easier than other, less familiar topics, Krakauer points out that much of his writing through the years has strayed from his purported niche. Indeed, tucked amid articles on national parks and powder skiing are features about everything from urban apartment architecture to the 1945 Nagasaki bombing.

“If a publisher can make a writer into a brand, they will,” Bryant says of Krakauer’s struggle against his outdoors-writer persona. “Jon hates that, he grates against it, and he won’t have it.”

***

Today, with his living safely eked out, Krakauer need not sit down to write another word. But curiosity struck yet again, and Krakauer’s latest, Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman, was released this week. The book is an investigation into the death of Tillman, the NFL player-turned-soldier who died under suspicious circumstances in Afghanistan. Krakauer’s research included six months embedded with the U.S. military in Afghanistan, and exclusive access to Pat’s private journals and letters to family and friends written during his deployment. Despite intense anticipation and a planned first run of 500,000 copies, Krakauer suddenly pulled the book three months before its scheduled release in the fall of 2008. He tells me the decision was made after he uncovered “explosive material…stuff that I had to check out.”

“I couldn’t, in good faith, release the book as it was and potentially make mistakes,” he says, perhaps recalling the uproar over the purported inaccuracies in Into Thin Air, events he still replays in his mind, hoping to unravel their complexity once and for all.

For now, Krakauer doesn’t have any new projects on the horizon, and says he isn’t sure when – or if – he will. What he does know, he tells me, is that while he writes and climbs for similar reasons – solitude, intensity, masochism – mountains are an off-limits topic. His passion for the outdoors earned him respect, renown and financial security, but Krakauer insists he never sought to turn climbing into a career. Now, he intends to reclaim the mountains as his own, private escape.

“When I climb these days, I don’t even bring a camera, because I’m so tired of trying to record and write about it,” he sighs. “When I’m out there, it’s this chance to just zone out and focus so intently on the climb. That’s why I’m there. I don’t want to feel forced to bring anything back.”


Comments

Active Conversation
One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 13 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Thanks for this. Really interesting. I think what ties all his work together is what ties much of other journo’s work….intense, passionate curiosity. It’s not per se about the mountains or Mormons but finding and telling great stories.

  2. collapse expand

    I think you’re right that what motivates Krakauer is what motivates other journalists. But it’s always interesting to see how they manifest their curiosity – for him, writing is very much a solitary experience, and a very intense and often painful one, I think. He’s also *very* lucky in that he now has the luxury of waiting for a story that piques his interest, rather than writing for the pay check…living the journalist’s dream.

  3. collapse expand

    Wonderful post Katie. Krakauer is one of my all time favorite authors. I go back and reread his books and find details I missed every single time. I really enjoyed the insight into his career; you have made my day!!

  4. collapse expand

    I think all writing has to be (?) solitary, but he is the luckiest of the lucky elite to sit back and cherry-pick his projects, that’s for sure.

  5. collapse expand

    Excellent profile, especially after using napkins as a notebook! Great read … It’s good to hear writing isn’t easy for him, even though he has been so repeatedly successful; and, Under the Banner of Heaven, which I read, did seem stilted at times to me, maybe his critics are right that he’s most suited to subjects he’s more grounded in (as maybe we all are). Though I didn’t have problems with his criticisms of Mormon Country. He did make an effort to show they were his views, as a person deeply suspicious of faith.

  6. collapse expand

    Marcelo: Thanks for the comment. Under the Banner of Heaven was definitely a departure…it read like Krakauer himself was lost and scrambling and unsure. But I liked that about the book. He was very forthcoming in admitting how new the topic was to him and how biased his own perceptions were.

    …And hey, I’d use my own arms as a notebook if Jon Krakauer were ever to agree to another interview!

  7. collapse expand

    Great profile on Krakauer! I found “Into the Wild” to be both incredibly engrossing and disturbing. I couldn’t stop thinking about it for days.

    p.s. were you at the Whole Foods Bowery during the phone call with Krakauer? My goodness, props to you for being able to conduct an interview through the noise and crowds! NYC grocery stores are madhouses…

    • collapse expand

      Megan, thanks. And yes, I was at the Whole Foods in Bowery. To be specific, the second-floor cafeteria, at a table across from the coffee bar. It’s my favorite interview story…I mean…the worst timing *ever* for him to call.

      Have you read Into Thin Air? That one is equally disturbing, and for similar reasons. So much of his work centers around human hubris and fragility, and the larger implications. More than just mountains, indeed!

      In response to another comment. See in context »
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I'm a full-time heath & science writer at Sphere and a contributing editor at True/Slant. I also contribute military health news to Danger Room at Wired.com, and have recently written for Marie Claire, World Politics Review and Next American City.

    My first foray into journalism came in middle school - at a French-speaking plaid-kilt-wearing educational institute somewhere in the Canadian tundra. It was there that I decided to start my own newspaper, to disseminate my sarcasm and attitude problem among my peers. We lasted three issues.

    From there I started to freelance, and when I became a medium-sized fish in a small Canadian lake, I decided to move to New York, and become a spore in a vast journalistic ocean. The adventure continues.

    I try to parallel my personal interests with my professional work - so most of my writing has some connection to health, science and animal rights.

    Email me Extreme story ideas at

    katiedrumm@gmail.com

    You can also find me:

    At Danger Room on Wired's website.

    Or on Twitter @katiedrumm.

    Otherwise, I'm either triathloning, eating, breaking my pelvis, or sleeping. Extreme, I know.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 203
    Contributor Since: May 2009
    Location:N to the YC

    What I'm Up To

    • Danger Room at Wired.com

      wired-logo-2I contribute coverage of the military medical beat at Wired.com

       
    • World Politics Review

      3818788252_e035c9a711I contribute military/defense coverage to World Politics Review

       
    • On Twitter

      twitter_logo_header-2

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    • +O
    >.