What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Aug. 6 2009 - 3:53 pm | 41 views | 0 recommendations | 4 comments

Sotomayor confirmed as expected, but conservatives declare victory

Mark Wilson/Getty

Mark Wilson/Getty

With a vote of 68-31, the Senate confirmed the nomination of Justice Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. Only Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) did not cast a vote in the confirmation, and 9 Republicans crossed the aisle to vote for Sotomayor. She is the first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court.

The confirmation was an unsurprising outcome in what had been a very smooth nomination and confirmation process, despite some antagonistic rhetoric from Republicans. In both her Senate Judiciary Committee hearings and Senate floor hearings, GOP senators referenced her “wise Latina” address, discussed Ricci as evidence of her activism, mentioned her role on the Board of Directors at the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, all while alluding to her support of quotas in affirmative action.

“The confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor brings us closer to realizing the goal of a more perfect Union,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, on Sotomayor’s confirmation. “My vote to confirm Sonia Sotomayor is among those I am most proud to have cast.”

Despite the overwhelming confirmation, some conservatives took the 31 votes against Sotomayor as a sign of victory.

“One need only recall the mere three GOP votes against the elevation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court to know that the Republican leadership . . . and most of the party’s other senators deserve tremendous credit for refusing to be cowed by the ‘you better vote for the first Hispanic Supreme Court nominee’ attitude of the White House and Senate Democrats,” said Cur Levey, director of the conservative interest group, Committee for Justice

Conservative victory or not, Sotomayor’s confirmation does little to change the political balance of the Supreme Court as she will be replacing the liberal justice David Souter.


Comments

4 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    1993, when Ginsburg was confirmed, was a million years ago. Back then, the GOP was not nearly as lockstep crazy as it is today. A few of them might have still ascribed to the concept of “doing the right thing,” despite the politics of the moment.

    Today? Not a chance. Every GOP Member voted as an act of political calculus, based on the number of Hispanics in their districts or the number of nutballs they felt they had to abide.

  2. collapse expand

    Leahy should have voted for Estrada. Could have got a Latino on the court a lot faster. Anyway, why the heil do we look at everything through the filter of what race they are!

  3. collapse expand

    jon stewart sums up conservatives mind set on everything.
    “conservatives you won the lottery,
    oh no now i have to buy a wallet.”

  4. collapse expand

    I don’t see how conservatives think this is a victory, but it does seem like the political calculus behind the voting was highlighted more during the hearings.

    I think both sides are going to be surprised by Sotomayor. From what I’ve seen of her rulings, they defy any simple political categorization.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    While working at Talking Points Memo Muckraker during the 2008 Election, I covered the Justice Department politicization, voting rights law and the insanity of Alaska politics. I loved the beat which was somewhere between the wonky side of politics and the law. The realization was enough to send me off to law school in D.C. -- which seems to be a perfect combination of both.

    Though I've covered everything from birth control to blenders in my few years in journalism, this blog will be a compilation of stories related to the Supreme Court, federal courts, and the law generally. With an occasional story about Sarah Palin or Ted Stevens thrown in for good measure.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 111
    Contributor Since: March 2009
    Location:Brooklyn