What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Jul. 13 2009 - 12:18 pm | 13 views | 0 recommendations | 0 comments

Race, race and race dominate GOP opening statements in Sotomayor hearings

At the ten-minute break this morning in the confirmation hearings of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, five of the seven Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have spoken, laying out a predictable path of antagonism for the nominee.

Ranking minority member Jeff Sessions’ (R-Ala.) opening statement was essentially a roadmap of the Republican complaints against Sotomayor. He twice referenced her “wise Latina” address, spoke to her statement about appellate courts as creators of policy, discussed Ricci as evidence of her activism, threw in a mention of her role on the Board of Directors at the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, and casually mentioned the fund’s support of quotas in affirmative action. “Empathy for one party is always prejudice against another,” said Sessions as he closed.

None of this was surprising. Analysis of the witness list released last week made it clear that race and affirmative action were going to dominate the hearings — and Republican senators are living up to that prediction.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) echoed Sessions, both emphasizing the need for unbiased, non-activist judges, but Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) had a more bombastic opening statement.  In a scripted statement, Kyl tiptoed up to the line on charging Sotomayor as biased, saying, “Many of Judge Sotomayor’s public statements suggest that she may, indeed, allow, and even embrace, decision-making based on her biases and prejudice.”

But where Kyl was backhanded in his criticism, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was candid. “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you’re going to be confirmed,” said Graham in a refreshing moment of honesty. ”I don’t want milquetoast judges. I want judges who are able to speak their minds,” Graham surprisingly said later, though he made clear he was still disquieted and looking for an explanation from Sotomayor on her “wise Latina” remarks.


No Comments Yet
Post your comment »
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    While working at Talking Points Memo Muckraker during the 2008 Election, I covered the Justice Department politicization, voting rights law and the insanity of Alaska politics. I loved the beat which was somewhere between the wonky side of politics and the law. The realization was enough to send me off to law school in D.C. -- which seems to be a perfect combination of both.

    Though I've covered everything from birth control to blenders in my few years in journalism, this blog will be a compilation of stories related to the Supreme Court, federal courts, and the law generally. With an occasional story about Sarah Palin or Ted Stevens thrown in for good measure.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 111
    Contributor Since: March 2009