<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Questions for Linda Greenhouse on Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/2009/05/03/three-questions-for-linda-greenhouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/2009/05/03/three-questions-for-linda-greenhouse/</link>
	<description>Blogging Justice, the Supreme Court and players inbetween</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 05:38:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justice John Paul Stevens to retire from Supreme Court bench; Get ready for the fire this time - Michael Roston - Newsbroke - True/Slant</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/2009/05/03/three-questions-for-linda-greenhouse/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Justice John Paul Stevens to retire from Supreme Court bench; Get ready for the fire this time - Michael Roston - Newsbroke - True/Slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/?p=137#comment-209</guid>
		<description>[...] Solicitor General Elena Kagan, who has never served as a judge, could serve as a judge, and also Kate Klonick&#8217;s interview with ex-NY Times Supreme Court correspondent Linda Greenhouse which looks at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Solicitor General Elena Kagan, who has never served as a judge, could serve as a judge, and also Kate Klonick&#8217;s interview with ex-NY Times Supreme Court correspondent Linda Greenhouse which looks at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deskates</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/2009/05/03/three-questions-for-linda-greenhouse/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>deskates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 02:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/?p=137#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Kate, in your interview Linda Greenhouse says:

&quot;In this day and age you can’t have a Supreme Court of eight guys and one 76 year-old woman.&quot;
Why not?

And she says:

&quot;Many [democrats] think, &#039;We need our Scalia&#039; — which is to say a staunch ideological justice, but for the progressive side...&quot;

So, that puts Scalia on...the CONSTITUTIONAL side!  And that is why he is such a great Supreme Court justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate, in your interview Linda Greenhouse says:</p>
<p>&#8220;In this day and age you can’t have a Supreme Court of eight guys and one 76 year-old woman.&#8221;<br />
Why not?</p>
<p>And she says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Many [democrats] think, &#8216;We need our Scalia&#8217; — which is to say a staunch ideological justice, but for the progressive side&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>So, that puts Scalia on&#8230;the CONSTITUTIONAL side!  And that is why he is such a great Supreme Court justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrsandyclark</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/2009/05/03/three-questions-for-linda-greenhouse/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>mrsandyclark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 04:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/?p=137#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Kate Klonick,

You didn&#039;t waste one of your three questions for Linda Greenhouse.  (Not that there is any indication you were limited to only three questions.)  I appreciated her insight into early discussion of Justice Souter &quot;the stealth candidate&quot; to putting a politician on the bench.

This leaves my dream of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton intact.  I really didn&#039;t think President Obama would be in a position to be making this choice so early in his term or maybe even in this term.

On the lighter side of it all, I just hope he at least picks a woman that has paid her taxes.

Sandy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate Klonick,</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t waste one of your three questions for Linda Greenhouse.  (Not that there is any indication you were limited to only three questions.)  I appreciated her insight into early discussion of Justice Souter &#8220;the stealth candidate&#8221; to putting a politician on the bench.</p>
<p>This leaves my dream of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton intact.  I really didn&#8217;t think President Obama would be in a position to be making this choice so early in his term or maybe even in this term.</p>
<p>On the lighter side of it all, I just hope he at least picks a woman that has paid her taxes.</p>
<p>Sandy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashmir Hill</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/2009/05/03/three-questions-for-linda-greenhouse/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashmir Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/?p=137#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Kate-- did Greenhouse mean Napolitano as a Supreme Court nominee, or someone LIKE Napolitano?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate&#8211; did Greenhouse mean Napolitano as a Supreme Court nominee, or someone LIKE Napolitano?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Progressive Justice is a Persuasive Justice &#171; Overruled</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/2009/05/03/three-questions-for-linda-greenhouse/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>A Progressive Justice is a Persuasive Justice &#171; Overruled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/kateklonick/?p=137#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] a lot, but I wish she wouldn&#8217;t frame President Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court choice as one between a &#8220;persuasive&#8221; justice and a &#8220;liberal&#8221; justice. Probably the most effective Justice of the last 50 years was William Brennan, who was also among [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lot, but I wish she wouldn&#8217;t frame President Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court choice as one between a &#8220;persuasive&#8221; justice and a &#8220;liberal&#8221; justice. Probably the most effective Justice of the last 50 years was William Brennan, who was also among [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

