What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Apr. 24 2009 - 9:52 am | 10 views | 0 recommendations | 1 comment

Watching the Dawn

Change for America: A Progressive Blueprint fo...

Image by Center for American Progress Action Fund via Flickr

As I’ve written about before, the Republicans are setting up to possibly block the nomination of Dawn Johnsen, Obama’s nominee to the Office of Legal Counsel. Brian Beutler over at Talking Points Memo rounds up the latest chatter on the conservative wires on the GOP’s possible filibuster:

Yesterday, The Washington Times–one of the country’s leading conservative newspapers–published an op-ed calling her a “radical” and urging Republicans (and, comically, Democrats) to filibuster the President’s choice to head the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.

Also yesterday, McClatchy quoted Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) saying she faces a tough road ahead. “I think she’s in real trouble,” Voinovich said. “From what I’m picking up from consensus, she’s got a problem.”

And Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List, has sent word out to her members to call their senators and urge them to filibuster Johnsen’s confirmation. Some of those callers will enjoy friendly hearings. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) has already vowed to block the nomination of David Hamilton, who Obama selected to fill a vacancy on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Filibustering Johnsen will be a valuable point of leverage for the GOP — a way to get some attention to issues that are getting trampled by the majority. As I mentioned in my last piece, she’s a firecracker, who didn’t hesitate to get out in front on anti-Bush train.

On the other hand, Sen. Arlen Specter — the ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committee might be too toothless to really fight this. There was similar talk earlier this year that Specter would stage a battle over Attorney General Eric Holder’s nomination, which ended up going pretty smoothly. But if it’s any indication, for all the ruckus over Holder’s potential controversy, he was voted out of committee in a 17-2 vote — not so for Johnsen, who comes to the Senate floor with a vote split strictly along partisan lines in committee.


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    What’s another partisan, more or less?

    It’s got to be better than the empty seat currently filling the position.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    While working at Talking Points Memo Muckraker during the 2008 Election, I covered the Justice Department politicization, voting rights law and the insanity of Alaska politics. I loved the beat which was somewhere between the wonky side of politics and the law. The realization was enough to send me off to law school in D.C. -- which seems to be a perfect combination of both.

    Though I've covered everything from birth control to blenders in my few years in journalism, this blog will be a compilation of stories related to the Supreme Court, federal courts, and the law generally. With an occasional story about Sarah Palin or Ted Stevens thrown in for good measure.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 111
    Contributor Since: March 2009
    Location:Brooklyn