What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

May. 20 2010 - 7:12 pm | 1,748 views | 0 recommendations | 20 comments

Why isn’t the ‘Prince of Persia’ a real Persian?

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time (film)

Image via Wikipedia

It’s impossible to avoid trailers for the film “Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time,” which have even appeared embedded in ABC-TV’s coverage of the NBA playoffs. Those who’ve missed the trailer can watch it below, and when you do, notice the Persian domes and minarets. Notice the Persian-style dress. Notice the other Middle Eastern motifs (including sand dunes) that conjure up images of 1001 Nights. And notice that the prince himself, a man named Dastan (a Persian word meaning “story”) is played by a non-Persian actor, Jake Gyllenhaal. What’s wrong with this picture?

On the one hand, nothing. Why shouldn’t a white American actor portray an ancient Persian prince? After all, the movie itself is based on an original video game created by a white American (Jordan Mechner), and the prince in that video game (see here) has the exact same non-Persian traits as Jake Gyllenhaal. Still, there’s something disjointed about an entertainment franchise built around “Persia” – i.e., the empire that spawned Iran – whose main character is a non-Persian. Wait, you say. Didn’t Alexander the Great (he of European heritage) conquer Persia 2300 years ago? And didn’t he arrange intermarriage between Macedonian soldiers and Persian women? So couldn’t an ancient Persian prince be as fair-skinned as Gyllenhaal? Not really. And he certainly wouldn’t speak with Gyllenhaal’s “Prince of Persia” accent – a king of pseudo American/British construct that complements the full British accent of co-star Gemma Arterton. (In “Prince of Persian,” Aterton is a white actress who portrays a Persian princess named Tamina.)

The clue that should have warned me “Prince of Persia” would be watered down ethnically? It’s a Disney film. And Disney has a history of whitening its Middle East movies – most notably its animated Aladdin franchise, which featured Robin Williams, and an Aladdin character who spoke like he was from Madison, Wisconsin, not Mecca or Baghdad.

Gyllenhaal is a formidable actor (one fan even mistakenly assumes Gyllenhall is Persian), but if Disney and director Mike Newell (who’s from Britain) wanted an actor of Iranian/Persian descent, they had a wide range of options, including Maz Jobrani, Cas Anvar and (from Iran itself) Mohammad Reza Golzar. Golzar has been likened to Brad Pitt for his good looks. In fact, Golzar looks a bit like an Iranian . . . Jake Gyllenhaal. OK. Maybe the choice of Gyllenhaal wasn’t that atrocious. Disney and Newell could have cast Brad Pitt as the Persian prince. That would have been a tragedy of cinematic proportions.


Active Conversation
20 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    Of all the Persian actors working in Hollywood today Jake Gyllenhaal is easily my favorite.

    Pretty sure that’s sarcasm.

  2. collapse expand

    Mr. Curiel,

    When Hollywood wanted to make a movie about Genghis Khan, why did they have John Wayne play the part? There is not enough scotch tape in all of the Los Angeles to make The Duke look Asian. How many Italian American actors made a career out of playing the cruel future corpses of native Americans. How about Charlton Heston’s Mexican police officer in “A Touch of Evil”? There is of course Warner Oland’s infamous “Charlie Chan” series. The great Alec Guinness played “Koichi Asano” in “A Majoirty of One”, “Prince Faisal” in Lawrence of Arabia, and “Yevgraf Zhivago” Dr. Zhivago’s Mongolian half-brother.

    The more things change the more they stay the same.

  3. collapse expand

    They might have chosen Chuck Norris …. if they ANY balls.
    He would have totally rocked the casbah.

  4. collapse expand

    You need a movie star to open a movie, especially one with franchise potential. I’m sure Maz Jobrani had been regularly featured on the cover of US Magazine, the producers would’ve been more than happy to go with him.

    • collapse expand

      I suppose you’re right. If I were a billionaire and financing the franchise, perhaps I would also look for an actor who already had a track record with audiences in the West. Perhaps. But maybe you take a chance on an Iranian lead actor with a Hollywood name as co-star.

      In response to another comment. See in context »
    • collapse expand

      respectively, there’s 2 things i have to ask with this assumption, 1) what’s so wrong with making an exceptionally good story with an unknown cast? lately i’ve been more reluctant to lean towards movies that don’t need a big name actor, 3d effects, and huge marketing because you can count on the producers standing behind the movie for its storyline. all of the ‘extras’ is just laziness. and 2) isn’t their a problem with most of the actors on US magazine being white? more importantly, do you see an actor like Jobrani being on the cover any time soon?

      In response to another comment. See in context »
  5. collapse expand

    The truly sad thing is that Iran puts out some good films. It’s not like there are no actors there (or presumably Iranian-born ones here.)

    This is America, damn it: we like our Iranians played by white Americans pretending to be British.

  6. collapse expand

    They got Ben Kingsley, he’s half indian… that’s basically the same thing right?

  7. collapse expand

    So I think whats happening here isn’t a particular Disney plot or omission that leads to Donny Darko wielding the sands of time. Instead, I think its reflective of a much more systemic racism in American society. If you imagine you’re the Exec. Producer of this film and you want to do what your job is–make a shit ton of money. So the hard facts is that Jakie is gonna bring in more dollars than someone of the ethnic background the character purportedly is. So if its Jake’s star power that causes this stir, then the question becomes: why aren’t there Middle Easterners (specifically Iranians) that are of Gyllenhaal-caliber? Well, that’s because Hollywood is racist. 95% of major stars are of white heritage and that number is probably even more skewed when you think of those who normally play leading roles. This is probably because in the industry’s lizard-brain they think that America would have a tough time relating to people who aren’t white. Which leaves two sad possibilities: either 1) white America actually won’t see these movies that star non-white actors as leading characters, or 2) Hollywood is incurably conservative because of their profit-lust, unwilling to try something new, doing damage to the national discourse in the process.

    I sort of suspect its number 2. I mean, we can relate to a fucking robot (WALL-E), blue folks (Avatar), Toys (Toy Story), and even, gasp, Indian people (Slumdog Millionaire). In fact, I think white folks will go see movies starring black actors who are cast in leading roles (any Will Smith or Cuba Gooding Jr. movie). The only reason these actors get these roles is because they are cast as raceless, their blackness doesn’t impact their role. But people still go see these movies. So I think Hollywood producers are skiddish of moving outside what they perceive to be the mainstream and join the rest of us in a diverse country. Gyllenhaal and the Prince of Persia is just another data point along this timeline.

    (note: check out Avatar: the last airbender for whitewashing of the highest caliber where they are erasing Asians from the story entirely, or 21, the MIT blackjack movie, where the ringleaders were asian and the group was intermixed but the movie horridly whitewashed)

  8. collapse expand

    Does it mean you really don’t know that ancient Iranians were a white nation?!! I don’t know why Americans are so ignorant of history!!

    Have you watched the movie “King Arthur”? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Arthur_(film) about Arthur, a Roman cavalry officer who leads a military force of Sarmatian auxiliary cavalry in Britain.

    Did you ask “Why should some white American actors portray Sarmatians?” You certainly know that Sarmatians were also an Iranian people who lived in the eastern Europe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarmatians

    Please research, “Dastan” was the name of the father of Rostam, Iran’s national here and it doesn’t relate to the word “Daastan” which means “story”.

  9. collapse expand

    My son used to run with some young Iranians in LA. I think the talent pool is more limited than you think. Most of these mid-twenties men were helping their fathers develop real estate or going to college. I wonder how the “Prince of Persia” is going to go over in Tehran? Tom Medlicott

  10. collapse expand

    Why does it hurt for some that Persians (Iranians) could look white? Come one! Persians (Iranians) ARE white. They might not look “Nordic” but they are definitely Caucasians. Please just google “Iranian people”, visit your local Iranian community of exiled Iranians and see it for yourself!! This movie is one of the FEW Hollywood movies that has EVEN depictured Iranian culture and heritage rightfully. It is in the Sassanian Iran, right before the Islamic conquest of Persia. It is very accurate, especially the customs, looks and JAKE GYLLENHALL. Iranian actor REZA GOLZAR could easily pass as his brother. Mr Curiel, plz google his name and tell me he isn’t white!
    It seems as you people are more annoyed of the fact that the movie is not portraying the ordinary “camel-jockey” or “sand monkey” stereotypes for you to enjoy and laugh at. But the reality is that Iranians are not Arabs and that Iran lies in Central Asia and Eurasia (ancient Iran). Persians can be as blond as a Swede and as dark as a Bangladeshi. So sorry to burst your racist bubbles, but Iranians are mostly Caucasians, meaning white.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    Filmmaker Michael Moore may hate former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who may distrust Mohammed Fadlallah (the former spiritual head of Hezbollah) but all three can agree on one thing: They liked meeting journalist Jonathan Curiel. That’s me. I don’t fawn over people I interview, but I give them room to talk before formulating an opinion (or two). Beyond my journalism (a long reporting stint for the San Francisco Chronicle, plus freelancing for the Wall Street Journal, Christian Science Monitor, Columbia Journalism Review, and others), I’ve taught as a Fulbright Scholar at Punjab University in Lahore, Pakistan; and conducted research at England’s Oxford University, as a Reuters Foundation Fellow. I’m also the author of “Al’ America: Travels Through America’s Arab and Islamic Roots.” If journalists are what they cover, then I’m an omnivore – someone as interested in Picasso and Seinfeld as I am in Washington politics and foreign affairs.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 46
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:San Francisco

    What I'm Up To

    My book

    “Al’ America” (you can get it here) is out in paperback. It’s also being translated into Arabic.

    book cover