Skaters’ moves: Good or Bad idea?
With just a mere eight months until the Olympic Winter Games, the figure skating world has been blasted with a flurry of coaching changes amongst some of the sport’s top contenders to make the U.S. Olympic team.
The news of these coaching changes has been slightly shocking, as it’s unusual for a skater to decide to change coaches so close to such an important season. Generally, we skaters like comfort and routine. We skate the same sessions every day, sitting in the same bench in the locker room or chair in the lobby to lace up our skates. We practice a routine over and over again to make it feel like second nature. And, the final thing we do before our name is called to take center ice and begin our program during a competition, is to skate back to the boards for a last minute pep talk and a few words of encouragement from our coach.
The skater/coach relationship is one that is vital to the mental edge and results a skater achieves. Because the coach a skater decides to train with can play such a large role in the outcome of their season, when a coaching change is announced for a top competitor the skating world lights up with predictions of how this new match up is going to play out.
Here are my predictions for how the newest formed batch of skater/coach unions will affect some of the top American skaters this season, ranked from best pairing to worst:
1. Mirai Nagasu to Frank Carroll
Mirai Nagasu, who became the 2008 U.S. national champion at only 14, is coming off of a tough competitive season. Nagged by an ankle injury and a growth spurt, she was unable to repeat her national title last year and fell to 5th place amongst the U.S. ladies.
Although touted by her previous coach and some in the media as a somewhat petulant teenager, I don’t get that impression of Nagasu. I think much of her trouble at nationals last year was due to a lack of a sound and reliable jump technique.
PROS: Better jump technique resulting in improved consistency. Carroll will bring a calming influence, which will help to quell Nagasu’s nerves under pressure.
CONS: Carroll has his hands full coaching 2009 world champion Evan Lysacek. Will he be able to devote enough time to Nagasu?
BOTTOM LINE: With undivided attention from Carroll and a lot of hard work, Nagasu has the tools to become one of the strongest skaters the U.S. has seen since Michelle Kwan. Great pick.
2. Keauna McLaughlin & Rockne Brubaker to John Nicks
Last year’s U.S. pairs champions, by the skin of their teeth, McLaughlin and Brubaker have made a wise decision in choosing John Nicks as their new coach. Mr. Nicks, as he is know to those in the skating world, has coached champion pairs skaters since the 1970s.
PROS: Mr. Nicks will play up McLaughlin’s stage presence and enthusiasm, making this pair more exciting and eye-catching. Leaving Colorado Springs and the overcrowding of pairs teams to train with a coach who is able to give this duo greater undivided attention is another added bonus to their move.
CONS: McLaughlin’s inconsistency has hindered this team in the past, and it’s unknown if Mr. Nicks will be able to fix this. Being able to consistently land side-by-side triple jumps is key for the top pairs teams, and McLaughlin has her work cut out for her in this department.
BOTTOM LINE: Strong choice. Be on the lookout for cleaner lines and a more mature style from McLaughlin and Brubaker this season.
3. Jeremy Abbott to Yuka Sato
Jeremy Abbott had some brilliant moments last season, including winning his first Grand Prix Final and U.S. titles. However, he, like Mirai Nagasu, has had trouble staying consistent both in practice and throughout the two phases of a competition. Unlike Nagasu, Abbott possess a great jump technique, and his inconsistency is more due in part to his lack of focus and confidence in his abilities. Sato, a former world champion herself, is relatively unknown as a coach.
PROS: It appears Abbott and Sato have a friendship off the ice and respect one another, which is key for the skater/coach relationship. Sato is very calm, and her attitude will help Abbott relax when it comes time to compete.
CONS: This is a substantial move for Abbott who had been with his previous coach, Tom Zakrajsek, for over a decade. There will probably be an adjustment period, which hopefully won’t deter Abbott’s confidence too much as the season approaches. Sato is also unproven as a coach, making it slightly difficult to evaluate her coaching style.
BOTTOM LINE: Hopefully Abbott will channel Sato’s cool demeanor. The pressure’s on Jeremy to prove last year’s results weren’t a fluke.
4. Sasha Cohen to Rafael Arutunian
It’s slightly shocking that after all the speculation, 2006 Olympic silver medalist, Sasha Cohen, has solidified her comeback into the competitive arena. If she’s able to do well this season it will be great for the sport, as Cohen is not only a very exciting competitor, but the past few seasons the U.S. ladies have been in dire need of a “star” and Cohen has proven herself to fit that title and all it encompasses–the good and the bad. Arutunian, who previously coached one of Cohen’s main competitors, Michelle Kwan, is a fine choice for Cohen, but really, I don’t think it matters who she decides to take from, as it seems most of the time Sasha Cohen is her own coach regardless of who is standing by the boards while she competes.
PROS: Arutunian is a strong technical coach, and at times Cohen’s technique wavers slightly, so he’ll be able to get her back on track quickly. Arutunian will give Cohen the space she needs to work on her own, and I see this pairing as more of a mentor/guidance-like relationship as opposed to a really hands-on coaching relationship.
CONS: Cohen herself. It’s unknown if she will be open to listen to Arutunian’s coaching, and if she has it in her to make another Olympic team.
BOTTOM LINE: The telling factor for how Cohen’s season is going to pan out will be her performances at her first Grand Prix of the season, Trophee Eric Bompard in October. If she skates poorly here, or is not received well by the judges, I don’t see her sticking the season out.
5. Rena Inoue & John Baldwin to Jenni Meno/Todd Sand
Inoue and Baldwin, at 32 and 35, are veterans of the pairs world and members of the 2006 Olympic team. They are best known for becoming the first pairs team to land a throw triple axel in competition. Meno and Sand, three-time U.S. pairs champions and two-time Olympic team members themselves, are in the same boat as Yuka Sato as they are not known for coaching top-level competitors.
PROS: Meno and Sand have been in a similar position to that of Inoue and Baldwin during their competitive career, and can offer their new students advice and relate to being the veterans in the pairs world. I think at this point in their career, like Cohen, Inoue and Baldwin’s coaching choice is not as important as some of the younger competitors, as they have become their own coaches.
CONS: Inoue and Baldwin’s heart doesn’t seem to be in training and competitive skating anymore. Baldwin has been unable to consistently land his triple toe loop for the past few years, and he is out of shape. No matter what Meno and Sand do, I don’t see them fixing this team’s lackadaisical work ethic and giving Baldwin the 180-degree turnaround he needs.
BOTTOM LINE: No matter what magic Meno and Sand are able to accomplish, this team’s prime has past. It’s time for Inoue and Baldwin to hang it up.
6. Caroline Zhang to Charlene Wong
Caroline Zhang is the reigning U.S. ladies bronze medalist and a very consistent competitor, something which has been essential to her placements thus far in her career. However, Zhang has very poor jump technique resulting in under-rotations and is often hurt by the judges on her technical mark. Wong was the previous coach of one of Zhang’s closest competitors, Mirai Nagasu.
PROS: Zhang won’t have to relocate, as Wong coaches in the L.A. area.
CONS: I don’t think Wong is a very good technical coach, and this is going to really hurt Zhang as she grows and is unable to rely on the faulty technique she has now. I don’t see Wong cleaning up Zhang’s under-rotations, and the judges are going to continue to mark her down despite the fact that she has many lovely qualities to her skating.
BOTTOM LINE: Here’s the thing: I think Caroline Zhang could become national champion this year–had she not chosen Charlene Wong to coach her. What Zhang needs is a strong technical coach who is able to not only discipline her, but also clean up her basics in terms of her jump take-offs and under-rotations. Unfortunately, without fully rotated jumps and a better lutz and flip technique, I predict Zhang will left off the U.S. Olympic team.
So there you have my predictions, but I want to hear your voice. Let’s get chatting about this, so leave me a comment with your thoughts on these coaching changes.
The one thing that we know for certain: Throwing in these new coaching match ups is sure to add some fire to the ice–and I can wait to see how it all plays out!
Related articles by Zemanta
- U.S. pairs champions Keauna McLaughlin, Rockne Brubaker switch coaches (sports.espn.go.com)

Post Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment
T/S Members
Log in with your True/Slant account.














Overall I agree with all your comments. Regarding Caroline’s move to Charlene Wong; It would not surprise me that this is a temporary move. She should not start working on her jump takeoff techniques during the Olympic season. If she intends to eventually work on corrections in this area she will likely deal with that next summer.
Great blog! Kudos for your brutally honest views. Your background as a former senior level competitor and familiarity with the contemporary skating scene provides your writing with credibility +.
Pete Murray
Editor, Blazing Blades @ http://www.blazingblades.com
Thanks for your comment! Your speculation on Caroline’s move being temporary is interesting; do you think she’ll be shopping around for a new coach next season?
Although I agree that there isn’t too much time until the season begins, I think had Caroline switched to a stronger technical coach a vast improvement could have been made in a short amount of time. She is still young and eager to learn, and I think it’s important to change any bad habits a skater has developed as quickly as possible.
I’m not sure she has it in mind like as a pre-planned action, but possible. How she does during the coming season, and if she makes Olympic team or not will be a deciding factor. If your hunch plays out and she doesn’t get to the Olympics, I can see her moving on. One thing about Caroline, she is determined and driven inside to succeed. BTW Caroline had the most triples ratified of all U.S. ladies last season. Her technique is sooo not good, but so far she is making it work for her. Her determination may make who she is coached by, a moot point. I agree totally with you that she likely will not make the Olympics this go round… especially if Kwan returns. If that happens… the whole picture changes for all U.S. ladies. LOL
In response to another comment. See in context »Can you imagine if Michelle returns? That would be great! I fear that she won’t come back, though, because I think she would have made some sort of an announcement by now.
In response to another comment. See in context »From the Article – Michelle vs. Sasha in Lake Placid? Time will tell – by Candus Thomson on her blog at The Baltimore Sun, this tidbit of information:
Although she has until midnight, Sept., 1, to tell U.S Figure Skating officials if she’s in comeback mode, they have asked her to tell them before the end of July, so that they can prepare for the expected tidal wave of fan and media interest.
This provides Michelle with more than five more weeks yet to train and decide. She says she has all her triples back and if this is the case, it really all comes down to deciding she can achieve level 4’s in her spins and footwork. We know she will with her spiral sequences (best change edge spiral skater ever). I put odds on her return at 80 – 20 she returns to competition. Her motivation is not the Olympics but a 10th national title and a possible 6th World Title.
The Baltimore Sun article is @ http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/thetoydepartment/2009/06/michelle_vs_sasha_in_lake_plac.html
In response to another comment. See in context »Jennifer,
I am a huge fan af figure skating and enjoyed your article. I am curious – Are there any skaters that you think should have made a change and didn’t going into the olympic year?
Thanks for your comment, Susan. I actually can’t think of any skaters who I feel need this type of a change right now. I think probably following the results of this season coming up, there will be many more coaching changes. At this time, though, I think it’s probably best for most skaters to stick with their current coach, as this year is such an important one and the change may negatively affect some skaters.
In response to another comment. See in context »As a fellow competitor, were you shocked when Michelle Kwan left Frank Carroll four months before the 2002 Olympic Games?
Also- do you think Callaghan will ever be able to restore Kimmie Meissner’s confidence and consistency? With the sudden onslaught of puberty, her faulty jump technique seemed to finally fail her overnight.
Also, what role do you think Ken Congemi will play in Mirai’s training? Do Frank and Ken focus on different aspects of their training? Caroline Kostner has joined their training group for the summer and may stay with them for the competitive season. It is unclear whether or not Bebe Liang is still training, but she has been assigned to a Grand Prix event.
Do you think the coaching arrangement between Alissa Czisny and Brian Boitano/ Linda Leaver will ultimately help her at all? If she has been working on retuning her technique, what good would only spending a few days with someone every few months do for her skating? After her performance at Worlds, I expected Czisny to make a decision to work with Linda Leaver full time. Do you think her performance at Worlds ruined her chances to make the Olympic Team (politically)?
Interesting comment. To answer your first question: I was a little bit surprised, like most, when Michelle left Frank. I think it’s always shocking when such a competitive skater leaves their coach so soon to the Olympics, and I wonder if the results in Salt Lake would have turned out differently had Michelle stayed with Frank?
I hope Mr. Callaghan will be able to restore Kimmie’s confidence and consistency. I think it’s hard for skaters when they grow and their timing changes. Hopefully she has settled into the new technique that Mr. Callaghan was working on with her last season, and her consistency will be back up to where it was in 2006. I think Kimmie’s biggest obstacle is her confidence and trusting that she can do these jumps. Confidence is key for so many of these skaters, and hopefully she will be able to find hers this season.
As for Ken, I don’t know if he is going to be working with Mirai? If he does, I think he will play a positive role in her training because he is a very strong technical coach and a great motivator. While working with Ken and Frank I noticed they both focused on technique and run-throughs, and they complimented each other very well as a coaching team. Frank is a little more calm, and Ken possesses a great motivational quality to his coaching.
I watched Alissa at Worlds, and while her short program wasn’t good at all, I felt she redeemed herself pretty well in the long. I think if she is able to skate well in the Grand Prix series this fall and produce some strong performances at nationals, I don’t think how she skated last year should place a large role in whether she will or will be named to the team. I think the Brian/Linda thing can only help her, as it’s important to have support and Brian seems to offer her a lot of good advice. That being said, it’s ultimately up to Alissa as to whether or not she can skate well and handle the pressure this season. If she successfully defends her national title it will be a pleasant shock.
In response to another comment. See in context »