What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

May. 25 2010 - 9:15 am | 203 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

Gulf spill now pretext for climate bill obstruction

US Senators Joe Lieberman (L), I-CT, and Linds...

Image by AFP/Getty Images via @daylife

In the worsening midst of the worst oil disaster in U.S. history, Sen. Lindsey Graham said last night that the climate bill he helped author does not allow enough new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, and that’s why he won’t support it.

The South Carolina Republican told Reuters last night that the bill’s other two sponsors, Democrat John Kerry and Independent Joe Lieberman, had “greatly compromised” the bill’s original plans to expand offshore oil drilling in the eastern Gulf.

“You’ll never get my vote,” he said, without more allowances for fossil fuel extraction.

Graham was once described as the bill’s lone Republican vote, but that label dissolved throughout the first half of the year as he withdrew support for the bill three times between the announcement of his sponsorship and the release of the bill May 12.

His intermittent support was nonetheless more Republican support than a prior climate bill had enjoyed. It passed the Environment and Public Works Committee over a Republican boycott but did not have enough support to reach the Senate floor.

It was in return for the support of Graham, Lieberman, and conservative Democrats that President Obama made his portentous decision in late March to allow an expansion of offshore oil drilling. The Deepwater Horizon accident occurred three weeks later, on April 20.

The Kerry-Lieberman bill also includes concessions to the nuclear and coal industries that Kerry traded for enough conservative votes to pass the Senate.

The climate bill would create a carbon trading market designed to shift the U.S. economy off of fossil fuels and onto renewable energy sources. The bill would strive to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions 17 percent by 2020–the meager promise Obama offered the world in Copenhagen–and up to 83 percent by 2050.


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    It’s all a big fat f…ing joke…

    sad

    sad

    sad

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Environmental reporting recruited me 25 years ago—on my first day as a reporter for my college newspaper, when I discovered my college was discarding radioactive waste in the regular city trash. Since then I've written hard news for dailies, including the Arizona Republic, and slanty news for alternative weeklies, including Newcity. I've written a column for New Times, stories on the Web for Forecast Earth, essays for PEN International and other magazines. I lived in an idyllic California village nestled among volcanoes and vineyards until my batteries were full of sunshine, and then I returned to my origins on the South Side of Chicago, where hope persists with no illusions about the struggle ahead. I cross the asphalt jungle by bicycle and el, mostly to get to the University of Chicago, where I teach journalism. But what matters more than any of this is a lifelong love for the natural world. We are all born with it, I believe, but some turn away.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 217
    Contributor Since: April 2009
    Location:Chicago, South Side

    What I'm Up To

    Posts from Copenhagen:

    COP-15