What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Aug. 18 2009 - 2:22 pm | 7 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

EPA releases 2008 air pollution data–early

Smokestacks from a wartime production plant, W...

Image via Wikipedia

Every July the EPA collects reports on releases of 650 toxic chemicals from more than 23,000 industrial sites throughout the United States. The agency usually releases the data in a comprehensive report each December, but as part of EPA’s new openness policy the agency released the raw data today.

For Americans this means that starting today, you can visit the website of the EPA’s Toxics Release Inventory, search by state or zip code, and find out what you were inhaling last year. As I write this, the TRI server that lets you search by zip code is either overloaded or down, but Windows users can download data files by state on this page.

The rawness of the data means some may be missing or innacurate, and the EPA plans to update the files again next month and complete its report as usual in December. Meanwhile, here’s the kind of information you can discern:

I live near the Fisk Generating Station, a coal power station operated by Edison International on the South Side of Chicago that predates, and has not yet been required to comply with, the Clean Air Act. According to the EPA data, the Fisk Generating Station releases barium, barium compounds, copper compounds, dioxin, dioxin-like compounds, hydrochloric acid, hydrogen fluoride, lead compounds, manganese compounds, mercury compounds, sulfuric acid and vanadium compounds into the environment.

I can click on each of those categories to find out how much. For example, in 2007, Fisk released 6,900 pounds of carcinogenic barium compounds and 0.36 grams of highly poisonous dioxin out of its smokestack and into the air in my neighborhood.

“EPA’s job is to ensure an open and transparent flow of information between Americans and their government, and today’s unprecedented step represents the agency’s commitment to doing just that,” EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, said in a press release. “While we are still analyzing this information, we hope this raw data will be reviewed and used responsibly by stakeholders and the public to help them make informed decisions.”


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    I’m so glad this information is out there, but I’m not so glad that only the big guys (Greenpeace, WWF, Sierra, etc.) are the only ones that regularly use it to make some pressure.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Environmental reporting recruited me 25 years ago—on my first day as a reporter for my college newspaper, when I discovered my college was discarding radioactive waste in the regular city trash. Since then I've written hard news for dailies, including the Arizona Republic, and slanty news for alternative weeklies, including Newcity. I've written a column for New Times, stories on the Web for Forecast Earth, essays for PEN International and other magazines. I lived in an idyllic California village nestled among volcanoes and vineyards until my batteries were full of sunshine, and then I returned to my origins on the South Side of Chicago, where hope persists with no illusions about the struggle ahead. I cross the asphalt jungle by bicycle and el, mostly to get to the University of Chicago, where I teach journalism. But what matters more than any of this is a lifelong love for the natural world. We are all born with it, I believe, but some turn away.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 217
    Contributor Since: April 2009
    Location:Chicago, South Side

    What I'm Up To

    Posts from Copenhagen:

    COP-15