What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

May. 14 2009 - 1:29 am | 424 views | 0 recommendations | 10 comments

What’s the opposite of environmentalist?

I need a single-word antonym for environmentalist. Why? Because there are many occasions when I would use this word, but the word never comes. There’s just this empty thought balloon floating where the word should be. Either we don’t yet possess such a word, or we have one but it’s exceedingly good at eluding me and the people I’ve queried.

The opposite is definitely not “conservative,” so don’t even think about it. There’s nothing more conservative than conservation. By definition.

blockheads2

Image via Wikipedia.

For some reason I’ve always been tempted by “Blockheads,” a reference to the red animated blocks who are always causing trouble for Gumby (who is green after all) and Pokey. But I think some Blockheads might take offense at being called Blockheads.

A colleague of mine suggested “depletist” or “depletionist,” which might function as an opposite to conservationist, but doesn’t work as well when opposed to environmentalist. The problem with depletist, it seems to me, is that it should have its own opposite that means something like filler-upper.

Any suggestions?

UPDATE: John McIntyre has taken up the question at You Don’t Say, and some suggestions have also been arriving through back channels. As you’ll see, the challenge seems to be finding an apt term that isn’t pejorative. Some of the suggestions so far: consumerist, industrialist, pillager (from Karen), squanderist (from Stan), envirodiffident (from Michael Pakenham), homocentrist (from Jim in Austin)…

UPDATE: See many of the suggestions that arrived debated in a followup column: “Are you a wasteroon?


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 10 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Hi, Jeff. John McIntyre mentioned your question in his blog.

    I think the only way to accurately name the opposite of something as specific as “environmentalist” is to put “non-” in front of it.

    Trying to identify *the* opposite of “environmentalist,” or of any similar “-ist” term, is problematic for two main reasons:

    1. The “-ist” term is seldom specific enough, so we don’t know what we are looking for the opposite of.

    In the matter you have raised, an environmentalist can be a person who simply *cares* about environmental matters, a person who *believes in taking action* to protect the environment (eco-protection), a person who *does take action* to protect the environment, or something else.

    The opposites of the types I mentioned are, respectively: someone apathetic about environmental concerns, someone who does not believe in taking action to protect the environment, and someone who does not take action.

    2. If a person is not in a given “-ist” group, it may be because he/she is apathetic, neutral with respect to action, or supportive (to some degree) of interests that conflict with the “-ist” cause.

    In short, environmentalism has multiple non-supporting forces, some of which are actually opposing forces.

    Thanks for asking a though-provoking question. Sorry I couldn’t answer it directly!

    • collapse expand

      Thank you for these thoughts, Dave. You bring up an important point about generality. But I also have trouble finding fitting antonyms for more specific versions of the term, like someone who wants to preserve natural places (a preservationist), or someone who wants to conserve natural resources (a conservationist). What is someone who wants to consume them (a consumist?). It seems to me that “environmentalist” expresses a more general attitude toward the natural world.

      In response to another comment. See in context »
      • collapse expand

        Finding one-word terms that focus on the competing values (rather than a universal antonym) seems much more workable.

        If a person doesn’t care much or do much about the environment, what does he/she care about more, or do instead? That’s probably the kind of “-ist” he/she is.

        Your term “consumist” is apt, but if people consume too much or in an irresponsible way, it’s probably driven by some more specific value — like getting a good deal (“frugalist”), saving time or energy (“convenientist”), or living the ‘good life’ (“luxurist”). Know what I mean?

        Fun topic. Thanks again.

        In response to another comment. See in context »
  2. collapse expand

    The underlying difference, in the least judgmental terms, would be that environmentalists believe in good stewardship and the others have faith that “the Lord will provide”. So I would say that an antonym most likely to find acceptable currency would be in this realm. Maybe “providentialist” or “provisionist.”
    You’d need a different, stronger word for those, like Dick Cheney, who know that we’re on a path to doom and yet don’t care. Maybe “Satanist.”

  3. collapse expand

    Hey Jeff,
    Good to see you’re name in print again! When I first became active in environmentalism James Watt was Reagan’s Secretary of the Interior, and he most certainly represented the opposite of an environmentalist. His whole theory was that the earth was given to us to exploit. Given that, I think “Exploitationist” could be an appropriate moniker.

    I look forward to reading future posts from you!

    Larry Allen
    SLO

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Environmental reporting recruited me 25 years ago—on my first day as a reporter for my college newspaper, when I discovered my college was discarding radioactive waste in the regular city trash. Since then I've written hard news for dailies, including the Arizona Republic, and slanty news for alternative weeklies, including Newcity. I've written a column for New Times, stories on the Web for Forecast Earth, essays for PEN International and other magazines. I lived in an idyllic California village nestled among volcanoes and vineyards until my batteries were full of sunshine, and then I returned to my origins on the South Side of Chicago, where hope persists with no illusions about the struggle ahead. I cross the asphalt jungle by bicycle and el, mostly to get to the University of Chicago, where I teach journalism. But what matters more than any of this is a lifelong love for the natural world. We are all born with it, I believe, but some turn away.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 217
    Contributor Since: April 2009
    Location:Chicago, South Side

    What I'm Up To

    Posts from Copenhagen:

    COP-15