What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Jun. 15 2010 - 2:12 pm | 129 views | 0 recommendations | 1 comment

Will November be a Democratic ‘bloodbath’?

Jon Chait looks at a new NPR poll focused on battleground states and districts, and concludes that November will be a “bloodbath” for Democrats. Here’s what the poll has to say about the upcoming election:

The results are a wake-up call for Democrats whose loses in the House could well exceed 30 seats. In the named-congressional ballot in the 60 Democratic districts, Democrats trail their Republican opponent, 42 to 47 percent, with only a third saying they want to vote to reelect their member. In the top tier of 30 most competitive seats, the Democratic candidate trails by 9 points (39 to 48 percent) and by 2 points in the next tier of 30 seats (45 to 47 percent). On the other hand, the Republican candidates are running well ahead in their most competitive seats ( 53 to 37 percent). As we saw in the special election in PA-12, Democrats will have to battle on a seat-by-seat basis — that has shifted these kinds of numbers this year.

The effort by individual campaigns will have to push against walls that seem very hard to move at this point. We tested Democratic and Republican arguments on the economy, health care, financial reform and the big picture for the 2010 election. The results consistently favored the Republicans and closely resembled the vote breakdown. Democrats are hurt by a combined lack of enthusiasm and an anti-incumbent tone.

If true, this would signal a complete bloodbath for Democrats across the country. But my hunch is that we should take this poll with a grain of salt. For starters, this poll is a single slice in time, there are no trend lines and we have no idea what these districts looked like at any time during the last six months. It’s entirely possible that these results have been constant and Republicans have always been more enthused than Democrats (which generally, is true). In which case, the picture isn’t nearly as terrible as Chait thinks, since as recently as last month, Democrats were projected to survive midterms with their majority intact.

Moreover, and as the Center for Politics’ Isaac Woods pointed out on Twitter, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (the polling firm) is relying on an odd methodology, choosing supposedly “battleground” districts as opposed to taking a national poll or polling a single district. It’s silly to pull together random districts — each of which may be “in play” for vastly different reasons — and generalize from there a broad conclusion about the electoral landscape.

Granted, I don’t think Democrats should sit on their laurels; things aren’t catastrophic, but they aren’t in good shape either. But they should also try to avoid overreaction. The siren call of Beltway approval has pulled many Democrats into opposing further stimulus and supporting measures for fiscal austerity, which is boneheaded. Right now, their survival depends most on employment numbers; the smart thing to do — politically and economically — is to pump more stimulus into the economy. More jobs means less discontent, and less discontent benefits President Obama and vulnerable congressional Democrats.


Comments

1 Total Comment
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Your “hunch” is to take this with a grain of salt? To not overreact to one poll? OK, then start looking at other polls and you’ll find that voters are generally angry and that they are losing patience with the Democrats and that blaming Bush won’t work for much longer.

    I think Democrats are in denial about how poorly their efforts are being judged by the public — because Democrats are so certain they are correct in their views, forgetting that most people don’t care so much about your views as about your results. And the economy still sucks, gas prices are still high, we are still at war, baby boomer entitlements are still going to bankrupt the country, college costs are still skyrocketing, mortgages are still underwater, banks are still cutting back on making loans … Democrats underestimated how bad the economy would get, and have not been able to get ahead of the curve, and now the honeymoon is over.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I am a blogger and occasional freelance writer. Usually, you'll find me here, but I occasionally contribute to PostBourgie.com, as well as Spencer Ackerman's blog (when he's away). At my old Wordpress digs, I blogged about progressive politics, public policy, nerdy things and food, and here at True/Slant, I intend to do the same. I'm all about the social media, so feel free to follow me on Twitter: jbouie, or friend me on Facebook (though I might make you wait awhile). And if you'd rather avoid social media, you can always email me at jamelle DOT bouie AT gmail DOT com.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 37
    Contributor Since: February 2010
    Location:Charlottesville, Virginia