What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Mar. 30 2010 - 12:48 am | 2,658 views | 0 recommendations | 31 comments

The Hutaree Michigan Militia, Lone Wolves, and Alex Jones’ New World Order

Fantastic! Yet another anti-government militia group that posted its military exercises on the Internet and allegedly plotted to kill police officers were indicted on Monday on conspiracy and weapons charges. What makes the Hutaree so unique: they are a Christian-based militia group driven by biblical teachings to take up arms.

Apparently their Jesus is also heavily armed.

As the Michigan-based militia group’s exciting web site states: “We believe that one day, as prophecy says, there will be an Antichrist,” the site says. “All Christians must know this and prepare, just as Christ commanded. . . . Jesus wanted us to be ready to defend ourselves using the sword and stay alive using equipment.”

But what really stands out is the Hutaree: they are yet another  anti-goverment extremists who fear the New World Order as often stressed on #1 conspiracy nut Alex Jones’ website/radio show.  Just like Jones’ philosophy, the militia group felt a need to stockpile weapons  in fear that the government will take away their guns. (Well, in this case they did take away their guns in fear of domestic terrorism.)

The Southern Poverty Law Center, in its recent report, has noted an “explosion of new extremist groups and activism” fueled by “broad-based populist anger at political, demographic and economic changes in America.” SLP defines such groups as those that “engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing, or advocate or adhere to extreme anti-government doctrines.”

Strange how that sounds vaguely like the rantings of  the paranoid, conspiracy theorist, talk show host, Alex Jones. This isn’t the only time  in recent memory that a lone wolf, with strong anti-goverment feelings, has acted at. Last month embittered pilot Joseph Andrew Stack flew his plane into the side of the IRS building in Austin Texas. His rambling manifesto sounded like a puffy-faced Alex Jones broadcast. Then there was also the shooting in Pittsburg of a rabid Alex Jones fan who was afraid that the government was going to take away his guns. And let’s not forget the Holocaust Museum shooting by a rifle-wielding white supremacist

Sure, Alex Jones wouldn’t condone these acts of violence,  but  does his role of being the voice of the lone wolf voiceless add fuel to the fire? Does it also help when Sarah Palin tells a crowd of angry Tea Party Patriots that they must “reload” when bricks are being thrown through the windows of Democratic party headquarters?

When you think of the Hutaree and the the sweeping conservative right’s anger over such things as the  health care bill and the Obama White House, think of the rhetoric of Alex Jones and how it influences all those lone wolves. And remember the words of beloved Sarah Palin:

“The crossfire is intense, so penetrate through enemy territory by bombing through the press, and use your strong weapons — your Big Guns — to drive to the hole. Shoot with accuracy; aim high and remember it takes blood, sweat and tears to win.


Active Conversation
10 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 31 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    I HATE THE GOVERNMENT!!!! But I will take that free legal representation said government provides. How bout the crackers’ mugshots? I bet the guy bottom right with the mullet is the minister of information. Thank god for Youtube and born-again honkey jihadists. This is actually really healthy. Call it the growing pains of a young democracy, (Thanks Condi!)
    Sunlight is the best disinfectant. And to think the G.O.P. was on cruise control headed for majorities in the House and Senate until they started playing with retarded Palin fire.

  2. collapse expand

    This is a sick FAILED attempt at smearing Alex Jones. This is the kind of smearing Cass Sunstein advocates in his “Conspiracy Theories” paper.

    SPLC is groundless in claiming Alex Jones’ claims are groundless.
    They have defamed him and http://www.WeAreChange.org Far from hate or violence promoting, these people fight to expose crimes using their inalienable rights described under the 1st Amendment.

    NOTE: how the term “New World Order” is used regularly by establishment media, politicians, and their “Roundtable-group” controllers as the answer to all the crises, but the minute one of us Proles say: “Huh? What’s that New World Order you’re talking about?” they and their well-meaning CrimeStop-practicing victims like this author say you’re making it up.

    We know who is mentally ill here: it’s those who would fear and protect those who have kept them in the dark, kept them in fear of Muslim “terror”, hating their neighbors who are elsewhere in the false Left/Right scamadigm.

  3. collapse expand

    Harmon, you are either from the Beasty Boys or you are a government operative. Your words are meant to incite hate for Christians and Alex Jones.. you mentioned his name 8 times… hahaha… of man… You are adding fuel to the fire with disinformation.

    here are a few corrections to your disinformation
    1) Alex Jones is right 95% of the time. Maybe you should visit infowars and see for yourself. Perhaps your head is in the sand and you don’t believe the NWO is real. it’s commonly know that it exists now Harmon, if that is your real name.
    2) Alex is for a peaceful return to traditional American values and is against the bailouts, H1N1 scams, global warming scams and forced health care which is unconstitutional
    3) The Pittsburgh shooter had NOTHING to do with Alex (again) but was upset that he had bad luck with dating women.
    4) The Pentagon shooter was a black liberal
    So why are you obviously trying to make Alex look bad Mr. Operative? This is the first post I have read of yours and it is over-flowing with false info and propaganda…

    You link peaceful activists with violent acts to spring the trap for an era of thought crime laws and politically-correct repression. You are on the wrong side of history creepy dude. Alex Jones is an American hero and the conspiracy theories you mentioned from Alex are backed up with documentation. Do your own research he says. I don’t hear you saying that operative…

    And by the way, most independents and a large number of liberals are having buyers remorse for electing Obama since the socialist health care take-over, car industry take over and banking industry take over. nothing happening here says HARMON LEON THE INFILTRATOR, except Christians and Alex Jones!!! please… where is your disdain for the Muslim TERRORIST that killed our soldiers in Texas this year LEON?

  4. collapse expand

    well beelzebud, let’s hear you quote one thing you devil lovin’ hack!

  5. collapse expand

    another lie, you just don’t know what you are talking about or you are pulling the line for the other side. Why do you hate this country so much that you would intentionally blast someone that stands up for our constitutional rights on a daily basis? If there is one thing I’ve learned in life it is that you can’t argue with stupid so I think I’ll end this blog with this question genius. Where is your outrage at the muslim melitia here in the states that have already killed 23 of our soldiers on our own soil? Where is your outrage against the La Raza militia? Where is your outrage against the Blank Panthers that threatened voters in the last presidential election. You even hate your own race don’t you?

  6. collapse expand

    Federal authorities on Monday charged nine Hutaree militia members in connection with the alleged plot. The group says on its Web site that Hutaree means “Christian warrior” and proclaims on its home page, “Preparing for the end time battles to keep the testimony of Jesus Christ alive.”
    But members of the group are outside the mainstream, a member of another militia group said Tuesday.
    “This is a group that I would classify as neither a militia or a Christian group,” said Michael Lackomar, a member of the Southeast Michigan Volunteer Militia. “They’re more of a private army or a terrorist organization or really just a criminal organization.”

  7. collapse expand

    New World Order Quotes

    Quotes from world leaders who reveal in their words as well as their actions what they have planned for us. Out of their own mouths they admit their goal is a one world government known as the NWO.

    “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” – Brock Adams, Director UN Health Organization

    “We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” – Arthur Schlesinger Jr., ‘The CFR Journal Foreign Affairs’, August 1975.
    “A world government can intervene militarily in the internal affairs of any nation when it disapproves of their activities.” – Kofi Annan, U.N. Secretary General

    “Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”

    Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

    “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

    Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

    “We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

    David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

    “The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.”

    Myron Fagan

    “No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.”

    David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

    “In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press….They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.

    “An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”

    U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

    “The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.”

    George Herbert Walker Bush

    “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

    Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

    “We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.”

    Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950

    “The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”

    Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

    “The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments’ plans. ”

    British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876

    “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

    Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)

    “What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil.”

    Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920

    “The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen….At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.”

    New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922

    “From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

    Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.

    “We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.”

    Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.

    “The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semioccult power which….pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I.”

    British military historian MajorGeneral J.F.C. Fuller, l941

    “For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.

    “The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

    “The depression was the calculated ’shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.”

    Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

    “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

    A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933

    “The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.”

    Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

    “Fifty men have run America, and that’s a high figure.”

    Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

    “Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government – a bureaucratic elite.”

    Senator William Jenner, 1954

    “The case for government by elites is irrefutable”

    Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?

    “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system ,they will rule the future.”

    U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

    “The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.”

    Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

    “The Council on Foreign Relations is “the establishment.” Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.”

    Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

    “The directors of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation.”

    The Christian Science Monitor, September 1, l961

    “The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.”

    CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs.

    “The planning of UN can be traced to the ’secret steering committee’ established by Secretary [of State Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department’s Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department’s postwar planning.”

    Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, writing in their study of the CFR, “Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy.” (Monthly Review Press, 1977).

    “The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.”

    Harpers, July l958

    “The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.”

    Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

    “The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.”

    M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

    “If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.”

    Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)

    “… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”

    H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)

    “The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.”

    Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

    “In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.’”

    Excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in The New York Times (October 1940)

    “If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order.”

    The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.

    “New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor”

    Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)

    “Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis.”

    Text of article in The Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)

    “The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God.”

    American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)

    “There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper.”

    Norman Thomas, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)

    “He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order.”

    Excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)

    “Alchemy for a New World Order”

    Article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)

    “The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.’”

    Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” — The New York Times (February 1962)

    “The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”

    Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)

    “He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order.’”

    Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)

    “If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

    Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

    “The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species.”

    Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,” in the book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)

    “My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.”

    Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

    “At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt’s time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order.”

    Part of article in The New York Times (November 1975)

    “A New World Order”

    Title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)

    “Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.”

    Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

    “We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms.”

    Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)

    “We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period.”

    Richard Gephardt, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

    “If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long.”

    President George Bush (January 1991)

    “But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council.”

    Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in The New York Times (January 1991)

    “I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court.”

    George McGovern, in The New York Times (February 1991)

    “… it’s Bush’s baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler ‘new order’ root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier.”

    William Safire, in The New York Times (February 1991)

    “How I Learned to Love the New World Order”

    Article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992)

    “How to Achieve The New World Order”

    Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

    “The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.”

    Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)

    “New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State”

    Title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)

    “The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all.”

    Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

    The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order.”

    President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in The New York Times (April 1995)

  8. collapse expand

    This guy is a shill. This is by far the crappiest bologna article I have seen here. By allowing such ridiculous material here, this site will lose all credibility. Material should be allowed from real researchers and not from people who are just paid by the SPLC or ADL to produce nonsense. This clown should be at a rag mag, not here.

  9. collapse expand

    It is quite hilarious to see how this post draws out the racists and anti-semites nutjobs. Alex Jones is a loon. He may actually be right about somethings but even a broken clock is right twice a day. Keep up the good work Harmon–if thats your real name(cue ominous music)

  10. collapse expand

    The creepy guy calling you (Harmon) a creepy guy.

    Too funny… he must have seen the transvestite way to die post first.

  11. collapse expand

    When left-wing icon Naomi Wolf warned that America was heading towards fascism under George W. Bush, characterized by illegal surveillance, arbitrary detention of suspects, and paramilitary martial law, she was lauded, but when she continued to issue the same warning as a result of Obama’s failure to reverse any of those policies, many on the left abandoned support for her.
    However, as Wolf’s recent interview with leftist website Alternet makes plain, liberals may finally be starting to understand that both political parties in Washington are part of the problem, not the solution.
    Alternet writer Justine Sharrock seems to be struggling to come to terms with the fact that Naomi Wolf’s rhetoric now very much echoes that of Alex Jones and many aspects of the Tea Party movement, an uncomfortable quandary for leftist media outlets, many of whom have acted as obedient echo chambers for the corporate media in demonizing grassroots populists as extremists and even domestic terrorists.
    “She speaks their language, referring to the Founding Fathers and American Revolution as models, admitting to a profound sense of fear, warning of tyranny, fascism, Nazism and martial law. When Glenn Beck warns of these things we laugh. When Wolf draws those same connections, we listen. How can both sides be speaking the same language, yet see things so differently?” asks Sharrock.
    The reason, as Wolf outlines, is the fact that Obama has preserved, institutionalized, and even expanded the very same policies that led to the left comparing George W. Bush to Hitler, a comparison which now, when made with Obama, is taboo, racist and an example of “fringe beliefs” according to the establishment media.
    “Bush legalized torture, but Obama is legalizing impunity. He promised to roll stuff back, but he is institutionalizing these things forever. It is terrifying and the left doesn’t seem to recognize it,” responds Wolf, adding that making comparisons between Obama and historical dictators should not be off limits when he is following similar tyrannical policies.

    “Obama has done things like Hitler did,” states Wolf. “Let me be very careful here. The National Socialists rounded people up and held them without trial, signed legislation that gave torture impunity, and spied on their citizens, just as Obama has. It isn’t a question of what has been done that Hitler did. It’s what does every dictator do, on the left or the right, that is being done here and now. The real fight isn’t left or right but between forces of democracy across the spectrum and the forces of tyranny.”
    And that’s what the left-wing needs to understand if true freedom is ever going to be restored in America. As Wolf touches upon in the interview, the left is brilliant at going up against the tyranny of the state, but only when a Republican is in office. As soon as a Democrat gets in, liberals suddenly prostrate themselves in obedience and join the chorus in attacking any dissenters as radical-right wing extremists who should have their speech taken away, blissfully ignorant of the fact that those very same laws will then be used to silence their free speech when the oval office rotates back to a Republican once again.
    Leftists are so prone to flip-flopping and becoming statists when a Democrat gets in office because they associate their own ego and political power with politicians, a foolish misjudgment in light of the fact that politicians stopped representing anything other than their own crooked interests decades ago. As Wolf emphasizes, “Frankly, liberals are out of the habit of communicating with anyone outside their own in cohort. We have a cultural problem with self-righteousness and elitism….We look down on people we don’t agree with. It doesn’t serve us well.”
    “I was basically saying don’t sit around waiting for the two corrupted established parties to restore the Constitution or the Republic. The founding generation was birthed by the rabble of all walks of life that got fed up and did risky things because they were captivated by the breath of liberty. There is a looming oligarchy and it is up to the people to organize a grassroots movement and push back,” states Wolf, outlining why she shares many of the same principles embraced by the Tea Party, while warning that huge chunks of the movement have obviously been hijacked by Republican operatives.
    Wolf, who admits that her “cultural heritage is FDR and Medicare and federal government solutions,” now expresses her support for the logic behind the states’ rights movement, a grassroots project mainly driven by libertarians and Ron Paul supporters.
    “If you think through the analysis, strengthening state rights is a good corrective of the aggregation of an over-reaching federal power. Take California’s challenge of the Patriot Act or states like Vermont leading the way with addressing the corruption of the voting system. It’s a good example of the Tea Party thinking out of the box on how to address a problem,” states Wolf.
    The interview ends with Wolf warning of the fact that concerns about martial law are now more prescient than ever.
    “I think we have gone very far down that road. I met Muslim immigrants in Brooklyn who were swept up in 9-11 raids, held in abusive conditions, beaten, denied rights. That’s how things started in Germany. Guantanamo was modeled after what Stalin developed for the Gulag. Why are we engaged in psychological denial that it’s not a concentration camp? In terms of martial law, my god. Since the book came out they deployed a brigade in the U.S. and suspended the Posse Comitatus Act. There is no question that it’s something to take seriously. People have a histrionic view of what martial law will look like.”

  12. collapse expand

    SMALZZ- you just say anything and expect it to be reality don’t you? Do you even know what Anti-Semite means? Who discussed Jews here (no one).It was overused by the establishment in the 90’s and only gov operatives use it now to try and divide the people. Inciting racism also is now used by the media and gov from the like of Jimmy Carter, Al Sharpton, etc. to further divide the people. Strangely enough there is no presence of either anywhere on this page. The only hate here is from the blogger who hates his own skin color and Christianity and evidently our constitution as well as he seems to hate Alex Jones with a “paid for” passion and that is what Alex Stands for as a nationalist.

    You don’t sound very smart…

    • collapse expand

      Actually someone did mention the ADL and SPLC. Also you ranted about La Raza and the Blank(sic) Panthers that you claim “threatened” voters in the last election campaign. So basically, you just make shit up or twist the facts so that they fit your own warped racist Neo-Nazi view if the world. It is glaringly clear from that you are a racist since you repeatedly accuse Harmon of hating “his own skin color”. You are Alex Jones are nationalists all right–National Socialists. You probably fall asleep at night masturbating to “The Triumph Of The Will”.

      You need to seek professional help for your delusions.

      In response to another comment. See in context »
  13. collapse expand

    Conspiracy theorist is a pejorative term that seeks to take away the right of others to express opinions that don’t fit into the reality of the norm.

    I would bet that Mr. Harmon wears a fanny pack and recoils from conflict in his ever day life, thus all the inflammatory comments to compensate.

    Alex Jones has issues, but I am a little uncomfortable with the attempt to suppress speech.

    Usually the cats throwing out the pejoratives trying to cow everyone else into submission are the secret racists. I would beat Mr. Goofy Disguise will tell you what kind of latte he drinks and about his black friends. I bet he is quick to talk about someone “Jewing him down.”

    We know your type. We are sorry that everyone doesn’t think like you. They had a pretty good plan in Germany during the 40’s to get everyone on the same page. That is really what we are looking at here isn’t it?

  14. collapse expand

    smalzz, I was going to let this go but you are to stupid not to comment on. You don’t seem to know the difference between Nationalist and socialist. For those of you that don’t know. Nationalist is one who cares about our rights as citizens and the constitution and socialists are those who take from the producing citizens and give to the non-producing citizens like smalzz and Harmon by means of Obamacare, nationalized banking, nationalized auto industry, etc… Nationalist Socialist is an oxymoron just like smalzz and Harmon. Never heard of “The Triumph Of The Will” before your mention and it seems it’s a propaganda Nazi book. Why are you so familiar with it and why is it such a good book to masturbate to in your opinion? I prefer thinking about my wife but whatever floats your boat. I will never understand the socialist/communists mind like yours. How does stating Harmon hates the color of his own skin equate to me being a racist? I was actually very happy for the black community finally getting a black president. I just wish it were someone that wasn’t funded by the grand socialist Gorge Soros! I didn’t want someone who bows down to Muslim leaders and apologizes to no end for what America has done on a continual basis. How about project21.

  15. collapse expand

    Project 21 is an initiative of The National Center for Public Policy Research to promote the views of African-Americans whose entrepreneurial spirit, dedication to family and commitment to individual responsibility has not traditionally been echoed by the nation’s civil rights establishment.

    Project 21 participants have been interviewed by hundreds of media outlets, including the O’Reilly Factor, Hannity and Colmes, the CNN Morning News, Black Entertainment Television’s Lead Story, America’s Black Forum, the McLaughlin Group, C-SPAN’s Morning Journal and the Rush Limbaugh, Michael Reagan, Sean Hannity, G. Gordon Liddy and Larry King shows, as well as in newspapers such as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Washington Times and many others.

    Project 21 participants live all over the U.S. and have a variety of careers. What they have in common is a desire to make America a better place for African-Americans, and all Americans, to live and work. Project 21 members do this in a variety of ways in their own communities, and, through Project 21, by writing opinion editorials for newspapers, participating in public policy discussions on radio and television, by participating in policy panels, by giving speeches before student, business and community groups, and by advising policymakers at the national, state and local levels.

  16. collapse expand

    Pretty sure youtheoperative is just a troll. Someone that dumb wouldn’t know which side of the monitor to look at.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I am the author of six books including, The American Dream, Republican Like Me, and National Lampoon's Road Trip USA.

    My writing has appeared in such places as Esquire, Huffington Post, Penthouse, Salon, and Maxim.

    I've appeared on The Howard Stern Show, Last Call With Carson Daly, as well as the Edinburgh, Melbourne, and Montreal Comedy Festivals.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 78
    Contributor Since: November 2008
    Location:San Francisco