What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

May. 15 2010 - 4:50 pm | 254 views | 0 recommendations | 3 comments

Chicago Cubs lineup past its expiration date

PITTSBURGH - APRIL 07: Derrek Lee #25 of the C...

Getting across home plate has been a big problem for Derrek Lee, tagged out here, and his teammates lately (Image via Getty Images).

I’m sitting in the Wrigley Field pressbox, fortunate to have the windows closed on a cool afternoon. Right before me, Derrek Lee has just struck out leading off the bottom of the eighth against the Pittsburgh Pirates as the Cubs try to make up a one-run deficit.

Life is tough these days if you follow the Cubs. The whole atmosphere has the scent of a 90-loss season, or worse, in the making. Heads should roll, but whose? Lou Piniella’s managerial contract runs out after this season. Other contracts, like Carlos Zambrano’s and Alfonso Soriano’s, have years to go. Everything just doesn’t feel right.

Especially the interminable slumps of Lee and Aramis Ramirez. Through all the typical chaos and nonsense associated with the Cubs, they’ve been as close to steady as possible. Yet the abject failure of the lineup to produce is traced back to them, and the typical streakiness of Alfonso Soriano. And you can only conclude that their tenure as a run-producing unit has come to an end.

That’s not unusual. It’s the cycle of baseball, like the four seasons. Groups of hitters are acquired and placed in the batting order. They produce for awhile, depending on circumstances. And then their “freshness” date expires, much like old food. The combination of Lee, Ramirez and Soriano are now stale.

The Cubs actually are fortunate they got enough out of them. Ramirez, one of the best clutch hitters in modern Cubs times, and Lee have been middle-of-the-lineup Chicago staples together since 2004. Soriano joined them as leadoff man in 2007 before being dropped down in the order two years later. The majority of such combos probably don’t enjoy such a long run.

Going back, the famed Sixties threesome of Billy Williams, Ron Santo and Ernie Banks had the longest run in franchise annals — basically 1961 to 1970 before Banks’ bad knees and old age finally claimed him. But Santo and Williams only had two more effective seasons as Cubs hitters before they went bad. Nothing can be forever in baseball.

The most powerful top-to-bottom Cubs lineup in memory was the 1984 NL East champions. Six players had 80 or more RBIs. Remember the Daily Double of Bobby Dernier and Ryne Sandberg, followed by Gary Matthews, Keith Moreland, Leon “Bull” Durham, Ron Cey and Jody Davis? They proved to be one-year wonders who led the NL in runs scored, but couldn’t put the Padres away in three playoff games in San Diego. That order was largely injured and/or less effective in 1985. They were a year older and not productive in 1986 and then they broke apart.

The Cubs won the NL East in 1989 with a lot of home-grown kids. Sandberg was the only holdover from ‘84. Andre Dawson had come aboard two years earlier, winning the NL’s MVP award after signing a blank contract during the collusion era. But Dawson had a sub-par year due to knee surgery in ‘89. His dip in production was made up for partially by rookie of the year Jerome Walton, runner-up Dwight Smith, golden-boy Mark Grace and Shawon Dunston, all products of the Dallas Green’s temporarily-revived farm system. Joe Girardi and Rick Wrona were rookie catchers also home-grown, but they did not hit much.

Young and enthusiastic, and productive. The ‘89 Cubs also led the NL in runs scored. But by 1991, Walton’s great break-in season was just a blip on a mediocre career, Smith was on the bench, Grace had settled in as a high-average hitter with only a hint of power and Dunston advanced no further in his abilities. That lineup spoiled quickly.

Nine years later, the Cubs tried to capture lightning in a bottle two years in a row by re-signing 40-year-old Gary Gaetti to play third base after he gave the Cubs a late-season boost to the 1998 NL wild card. But the Gaetti deal was symbolic of yet another lineup that had a one-year shelf life. That productive ‘98 batting order devolved into two successive years of 95 or more losses. Gaetti was retired by the time a new century rolled around.

Lee-Ramirez-Soriano was constructed to win quickly in 2007-08. They got the job half done, winning the NL Central, but also getting swept six in a row in two Division Series against the Diamondbacks and Dodgers. Once a veteran lineup fails that miserably in the playoffs, the chances of a future breakthrough are not great.

It’s an hour or so later after I penned the first word here. The Cubs have lost 4-3, stranding the tying run on third with just one out in the ninth. Ramirez has said the players have to get it done between the white lines. They’ve always said that. But often it’s just not possible. You know how hard it is to bite into stale bread? That’s how hard it is to win with a lineup that just doesn’t work anymore.

The cryin’ shame is young, invigorating blood from the farm system, so long deferred in its arrival, is knocking on the door. But the Cubs can’t clear out the pantry to re-stock fast enough. The first couple of years of the Ricketts family ownership will indeed be challenging.


Comments

3 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Very true. Though lately, there are some signs that perhaps Aramis and Lee may be starting to hit the ball again, they will probably be shells of their former selves.

    At least we are not the brewers. I think half of the drunks in that city are probably experiencing some sort of PTSD everytime they hear “Hell’s Bells” on the radio.

    I feel that this year, though it is young, everyone is being a little stupid. Should the Cubs have gotten some relief pitchers? Yes. (We have previously discussed the Rickett’s situation) Should we have brought in another bat or two, perhaps, though I am not sure that such an incredible falloff from our leaders could be foreseen. (I figured Fukodome would do nothing, stupid me)

    It seems that many teams in baseball have made horrible decisions. Vasquez in NY. Sizemore in Cle. Hoffman in Mil. Bradley in Sea. Ha.

    What troubles me more is that I also see the MLB making major mistakes as well. For all the things Selig has done right, he has gotten some major things wrong. Why are teams like the Yankees and the Redsox or the Brewers and the Cubs playing a series as one team’s home opener? It is a remarkeably stupid decision. Such rivalry games will sell out and have large tv audiences no matter when they are played. Opening day series will sell out and have large tv audiences whenever they are played.

    By making such scheduling decisions, MLB is taking money away from the owners. In many circumstances, such as perhaps ours is, that money could be spent on talent.

    At 5.5 out, and with signs of life in May, I am not ready to call for heads on a platter, or to throw in the towel, but the issue of scheduling, from a business standpoint, should absolutly be addressed. How can you increase revenue so much, but neglect this one simply thing? MLB is taking money out of the pockets of teams. Money that could be used to address the issues of our cubs, which so far this season, are many.

    • collapse expand

      The bigger problem above scheduling is attendance when the weather is not perfect and teams aren’t winning. I think the economy has taken the sailes out of the MLB schooner. Notice all the empty seats that were sold at Wrigley for the Rockies series? Or how ’bout seats that weren’t purchased in the first place? The Great Recession has changed consumer buying habits and this affects baseball for sure.

      In response to another comment. See in context »
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I've turned an avocation into a vocation. I paid just $1 -- can you believe that? -- to sit in the cheap seats of Chicago's ballparks in the 1970s. You learn a lot about sports by watching hundreds, even thousands, of games -- you don't necessarily need to "strap it on" as athletes insist.

    For the last three decades I've covered baseball and other sports in multi-media fashion -- for newspapers, magazines, radio, TV and on-line -- from my Chicago base. My sum total of experiences, relationships and perspectives will be featured in "Bench Jockey" while I continue my old-media work, including my venerable 16-season-old "Diamond Gems" syndicated baseball radio show. I've authored 10 baseball books since 1998 with No. 11, an oral history of 1970's baseball, due out at the end of the 2010 season.

    What you read comes from a media junkie. Back in eighth grade, I read four daily newspapers while watching Huntley-Brinkley and Cronkite. I'm also a dog "parent" of a golden retriever and basset hound. They're angels even when they're devils. My 16-year-old African grey parrot talks just like me -- yikes! I'm proud that my daughter, Laura, 25, is a recent Dean's List graduate in interior architecture from Columbia College Chicago.

    .

    See my profile »
    Followers: 22
    Contributor Since: July 2009
    Location:Chicago suburbs

    What I'm Up To

    Getting my Cubs’ news

    Chicago Cubs

    Two top Chicago Cubs fan sites I follow:

    Bleed Cubbie Blue

    Just One Bad Century