You can’t have it both ways on Cubs’ megabucks spending
I’ll always give an even higher profile to my good buddy Nick (The Young Hunk) Friedell of ESPNChicago.com. Check out the adjoining link to Nick’s blog, where he throws up a strong caution light to the Cubs’ spending $2.4 million over three years on new hitting coach Rudy Jaramillo.
Nick’s stream of consciousness is part of the usual emotional flow you’ll find around the Cubs these days. Fans and pundits alike are yelling about the team spending too much money, just throwing greenbacks away and conducting a personal stimulus plans for a lucky few players and, in this case, the much-admired Jaramillo.
The only response here: Nick and Co., you can’t have it both ways. You can’t complain about the Cubs not spending market rate on talent and then a few years later, after a couple of deals like Milton Bradley went awry, cry that they’re throwing money away.
I like to give history lessons in this space. Start with the recent past. Remember how the Cubs front office was discovered to be grossly understaffed, ranking 29th of 30 teams? They did not have enough scouts and player development people for a big-market team. That’s pinned on deposed president Andy MacPhail, who in July 2005 told me he preferred to be understaffed; he’d rather be “one man too short than one man too heavy” so that all his employees could be suitably “engaged.” MacPhail’s Tribune Co. overseers were shocked to find he was not spending the money on player payroll and baseball operations they expected. Just recall how you all howled when MacPhail let all the prime free agents each winter sign with other teams.
Next, I’ll wind the clock back almost five decades and then work forward with these nuggets:
–Legend had New York-area scout Ralph Di Lullo watching a young, raw left hander throw harder than anyone he had ever seen. He called the front office at Wrigley Field to ask permission to come up with a good bonus. Di Lullo was denied, and he thus lost the chance to sign Sandy Koufax.
–In 1962, owner P.K. Wrigley was shocked at all the bonus money he had paid out to young players who had flopped. So he banned his scouts from signing any new amateur players! The scouts could write reports and go on day trips, but could not embark on overnight excursions. Eventually Wrigley was talked out of yet another of his foolhardy edicts, but the scouts ended up signing just six players out of high school and college for the remainder of 1962. The effects on the already-weak farm system were catastrophic for years to come. Incidentally, Wrigley sold $100 million in chewing gum in ‘62, a huge number for the time. He was wealthy enough to own five teams.
–In 1963, West Coast-based Cubs scout Gene Handley, one of the game’s best, zeroed in on a prime high-school pitcher named Larry Dierker. He offered Dierker $35,000 to sign, not a dime more. The expansion Houston Colt .45’s (now the Astros) blew in with a $50,000 offer, and Dierker went on to a good career in Texas.
–William Wrigley, P.K. Wrigley’s son, was so much in the hole due to a $40 million inheritance-tax bite in 1981 he ordered the Cubs stripped to an expansion-team talent level. Rick Reuschel was traded to the Yankees for Doug Bird, Mike Griffin and $400,000. Who’d ever think a blue-blooded Wrigley needed 400-grand?
–After purging the Cubs of big spender, farm-system-developer Dallas Green, Tribune Co. bossmen were proud that their 1989 NL East champion Cubs, chock full of rookies and young guys like Greg Maddux, had just an $11 million payroll.
–Anticipating a player’s strike in 1994, Cubs Chairman Stanton Cook ordered GM Larry Himes to dump payroll in the off-season of 1993-94. A number of serviceable veterans were jettisoned. Himes made the ridiculous trade of decent lefty reliever Chuck McElroy to the Reds for a schlub pitcher named Larry Luebbers. Who?
–MacPhail’s early Cubs teams in the mid-1990s hovered in the mid-$30 million payroll range, far below comparable big-market teams. Meanwhile, MacPhail estimated his minor-league and scouting budget was just “middle of the pack.” Only after the embarrassing 0-14 start in 1997 was MacPhail shocked into boosting the payroll to more than $50 million for 1998. The Cubs won 90 games and the wild card as a result.
OK, history class over. We know Cubs GM Jim Hendry had a lousy off-season a year ago. He whiffed badly on Bradley. The Alfonso Soriano contract looks like an albatross now. Hendry overpaid Jason Marquis. He and his scouts apparently have some holes in judging character. Money needs to be invested wisely in a farm system that has produced very few position players.
But a big-market, big-revenue team like the Cubs has the ability to take some gambles and make mistakes with money. Imagine: Hendry now is under fire for throwing money at problems rather than being a supposedly cagey wheeler-dealer like Sox counterpart Kenny Williams. Nothing ventured, nothing gained, using an old cliche.
Holler if you’d like to go back to the old Cubs system of spending $1 when you’ve got $2 in your pocket.

Post Your Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment
T/S Members
Log in with your True/Slant account.













George, not only do I think the Cubs should spend $1 on their payroll, but I think they should move to Peoria and become the AA club for the St. Louis Cardinals.
Been there, done that for the Cubs, having developed Brock, Sutter, Lee Smith and then they have their peak years in St. Louis…Remember when your White Sox were the farm system for baseball in 1960, with Bill Veeck trading away several pennants with Earl Battey, Johnny Callison, Don Mincher, Norm Cash, et. al.? Ooops, too far back in history. Can’t keep giving history lessons without union compensation.
In response to another comment. See in context »Here’s hoping that Tom Ricketts is a big history buff. Rather than history repeating itself where the Cubs management is concerned, I’m hoping the new regime can learn from past mistakes. Sheesh, no wonder some fans like to believe in curses — it’s easier to blame the Cubs’ woes on (fill-in-the-blank) — a goat and/or black cat and/or …, etc. etc. — rather than the facts. Loved the article, George, yet strangely, I’m a little depressed. (By the way, I say $2.)
Well, Jan, I’m sure Tom Ricketts’ memory goes back at least to 1984, when the Cubs had the model offense to win in Wrigley Field. I think he has about $1.65 to spend in this economy. Unless he’s like Jerry Reinsdorf, who has a religious devotion to at least breaking even, Ricketts might spend $1.70 — run a little deficit. Even TribCo. coughed up some extra dough out the piggy bank in 1981-82 to bring a badly-underfunded Cubs operation into the late 20th Century.
In response to another comment. See in context »[...] though, I read in George Castle’s fine blog, Bench Jockey, that MacPhail’s bosses in the Tribune Tower could hardly believe how penurious their own bean [...]